Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: eligible transaction Sorted by: recent Court: orissa Page 1 of about 100 results (0.027 seconds)

Indian Charge Chrome Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Sales Tax Officer and ors.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : (2008)11VST844(Orissa)

..... for both the parties, the essential issue to be resolved in the present case is:whether the 'deciding criterion' for determination of the quantum/ extent of exemption in terms of 1989 ipr is to be limited only to the transaction of sale of goods by an assessee under the orissa sales tax act and/ or whether the quantum of exported goods ought not to be taken into consideration while stipulating the quantum/extent of exemption19. ..... he further submits that although the main prayer is for issuing amended eligibility certificate by the director of industries, the petitioner actually seeks exemption for transactions which the petitioner has not admitted to be ost transactions in its returns filed before the assessing authorities and therefore, exemption in respect thereof ..... or 'goods the petitioner is licensed to manufacture or has manufactured' or 'sales of any product covered by assessee's industrial licence' or 'the goods that can be produced against installed capacity', but exemption of 'tax liability' in respect of admitted transactions, under the act, on sales of goods from out of the actual production, against installed capacity or licensed capacity. ..... submit that the petitioner in its applications submitted from time to time admitting the transactions of sales to be made referred to the letter of permission or the quantity permitted to be sold within the dta does not, at all in law, supply any connection to the issue of the certificate of eligibility to exemption under the s.r.o. .....

Lingaraj Pipes Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Sales Tax Officer and ors.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : (2007)9VST95(Orissa)

..... the incentives available to new industries in order to fulfil its objectives (vide part ii, page 19), claimed that the petitioner-company duly fulfilled all the objectives and therefore, it was issued with a certificate of eligibility both in form e(96) (annexure 3) as well as certificate of eligibility on sales tax concession on purchase of raw materials, machinery, spare parts, packing materials and finished products under ipr, 1996 (new units) in form ii (annexure 4) issued by the director of industries, orissa ..... we are dealing with the periods of 1999 to 2000, 2000 to 2001 and 2001 to 2002 during which the petitioner-company carried out its transaction, the certificate of eligibility granted by the industries department remained valid. ..... the general manager, district industries center, bhubaneswar issued form ii to the petitioner-company vide annexure 2 declaring therein that the petitioner is eligible for exemption of sales tax on machinery, spare parts, raw materials, packing materials and finished products for a period of five years with effect from january 8, 2000 to january 7, 2005 under ipr 1996 for a period ..... certified by the director of industries on march 29, 2001 to be a 'priority industry' within the meaning of paragraph 2.7 of the ipr 1996 and the director of industries has issued necessary certificate in form e(96) declaring the petitioner-company to be eligible for all the sales tax incentives available under the ipr 1996 under the category of 'priority industry'. .....

Parikhit Meher Vs. Manasingh Dharua and ors.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : AIR1981Ori196; 52(1981)CLT217

..... at the time when the transfer took place, the unamended provision was in force and the maximum penalty eligible for the transaction was rs. ..... 200/- as had been provided under section 23 (2) of the orissa land reforms act at the time the transactions took place. 5. ..... patnaik for the petitioner makes a statement that the relief in the writ application shall be confined to the question of eligibility of penalty and its quantum. .....

Krushna Chandra Vs. Commr. of Endowments and ors.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : AIR1976Ori52

..... the learned counsel for the defendants was also not able to show us any text or law that veka ceremony and ceremony for adoption of a chela must be performed one after another in course of the same transaction, in order that the adopted chela can become eligible to be nominated as a successor of the adopter-mahant. ..... if veka ceremony is an essential ritual to permanently effect transference of the plaintiff from worldly life into spiritual life for all time to come and thereby perfect his initial initiation as a chela and confer on him eligibility to succeed to the trusteeship, it can be performed at any time before the adopter-mahant died and succession opened. ..... it contains the statements of the last deceased mahant regarding transactions by which the plaintiff's claimed right was created. ..... adoption of a chela or nomination of a successor being past transactions would be nullified, even though the obligation of intimation provided in section 39, as indicated above, was impossible of performance. ..... by these two transactions it is contended that the plaintiff has returned to his purbashram and forfeited his right as a duly adopted and nominated chela. ..... is expressed in the language which is fairly capable of either interpretation, it ought to be construed as prospective only and that there is a presumption against a retrospective operation if, when so operated, it would prejudicially affect the vested rights or the legality of past transactions. .....

Gobinda Chandra Sahoo Vs. Orissa State Financial Corporation and Other ...

Court : Orissa

..... on 31.3.2007 along with non-refundable processing charge of rs.10,000/- and initial deposit of rs.3,16,850/- but the same was not accepted by the corporation though the petitioner was even made to wait till closure of the transaction hours on the plea of pressure of work on the last date of the financial year. ..... according to the petitioner, though he was eligible to be considered under the ots scheme, 2007, his case was not taken into consideration under the said scheme. .....

Saurav Maharana Vs. Council for the Indian School Certificate Examinat ...

Court : Orissa

Reported in : 2007(II)OLR595

..... petitioner cannot claim equity with them.since the council was not aware of the fact that kamaldeep singh, kaushik prakash, bikram topno, santosh kumar nayak and suraj eka were not eligible for promotion from class-xi to class-xii they were allowed to fill up forms to appear in the final i.sc.examination. ..... examination, the council is estopped from questioning his eligibility for promotion from class xi to class xii and appearing in ..... this stage, it is estopped from questioning his eligibility for promotion and his competency in appearing annual i.sc. ..... party no, 4 for onward transaction of the same to the council to appear in annual i.s.c.examination, 2007 which was scheduled to be held in the month ..... of clause (a) of the proviso to rule 31 is statutory and goes to the root and operates to take away the eligibility or right or title of the petitioner to appear in the b.sc. ..... cannot be ordered without regard to the eligibility of the candidates.in the decision haripada das ..... submitted that chapter l(iv)(7) of the guidelines for affiliation to the council ('guidelines' in short) stipulates that the eligibility of candidates for admission to the i.sc. ..... the petitioner was not eligible to be promoted to class xii in terms of the examination regulations and affiliation guidelines of the council since he passed only in three subjects in class xi ..... according to the petitioner, he being eligible to get promotion from class xi to class xii has rightly been promoted and as such annexure-12 deserves to .....

Maa Chandi Stone Crushing Vs. the Chief Engineer (Con) - I, East Coast ...

Court : Orissa

Reported in : AIR2005Ori83; 99(2005)CLT457

..... has cautioned that intervention by the court in contractual matters may lead to considerable delay in execution of a project and consequential escalation of cost and therefore unless there is a substantial amount of public interest or the transaction is entered into mala fide, the court should not intervene under article 226 of the constitution in disputes between two rival tenderers ..... . for all these reasons, even if we take a view different than that of the tender committee and hold that the petitioner satisfied the eligibility criteria as prescribed in clause 6.1 of the tender notice for the work in question, we cannot not interfere in the award of the contract in ..... reason, the tender committee in its meeting held on 18.11.2003 took a view that the petitioner did not fulfil the stipulated eligibility criteria laid down in clause 6.1 of the tender notice quoted above because it had not satisfactorily completed supply of minimum 20, ..... he argued that the rejection of the tender of the petitioner on the ground that the petitioner had not satisfied the eligibility criteria in clause 6.1 of the agreement was therefore arbitrary and illegal and violative of the right of the petitioner under article 14 ..... these documents had been furnished by the petitioner along with his tender and these documents would show that the petitioner satisfied the eligibility criteria in clause 6.1 of the tender notice dated 1.9.2003 that a tenderer must have satisfactorily completed supply of minimum of 20,000 .....

M/S. Bengal Tools Limited Vs. Mahanadi Coalfields Limited and Others

Court : Orissa

..... sarangi ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------decided on : 25.09.2014 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -2- amitava roy, c.j.appalled by the perceived wrongful invocation of the price fall clause contained in the terms and conditions governing the transaction of the belt conveyors to the opp. ..... party-mcl inviting sealed bids from the eligible suppliers for supply of trunk belt and pony conveyors, etc. .....

M/S.Arss Infrastructure Projects Ltd. and Another Vs. Rail Vikas Nigam ...

Court : Orissa

..... the rvnl further submits that based on experience gained in finalization of various tenders the disqualification clauses and so also the eligibility criteria have changed from time to time and it has currently evolved to the form provided in the tender in question. ..... therefore, unless the court is satisfied that there is a substantial amount of public interest, or the transaction is entered into mala fide, the court should not intervene under article 226 in disputes between two rival tenders.12 ..... (1991) 1 scc 492.this court reiterated the principle governing the process of judicial review and held that the writ court would not be justified in interfering with commercial transactions in which the state is one of the parties to the same except where there is substantial public interest involved and in cases where the transaction is made mala fide. ..... manu/sc/0055/2000 : (2002) 2 scc 617.this court held that award of contract was essential in commercial transactions which commercial decision. ..... ) reliable and trustworthy in the light of its conduct in the context of the transaction in question. ..... mere difference in the prices offered by the two tenders may or may not be whether any public decisive in deciding interest is involved in intervening in such a commercial transaction. ..... again at paragraph-23 of the same judgment, the supreme court has held that the 2nd respondent came to the conclusion that the petitioner is not reliable and trustworthy in the context of a commercial transaction. .....

M/S. Arss Infrastructure Projects Ltd. and Another Vs. Rail Vikas Niga ...

Court : Orissa

..... the rvnl further submits that based on experience gained in finalization of various tenders the disqualification clauses and so also the eligibility criteria have changed from time to time and it has currently evolved to the form provided in the tender in question. ..... therefore, unless the court is satisfied that there is a substantial amount of public interest, or the transaction is entered into mala fide, the court should not intervene under article 226 in disputes between two rival tenders.12 ..... (1991) 1 scc 492.this court reiterated the principle governing the process of judicial review and held that the writ court would not be justified in interfering with commercial transactions in which the state is one of the parties to the same except where there is substantial public interest involved and in cases where the transaction is made mala fide. ..... manu/sc/0055/2000 : (2002) 2 scc 617.this court held that award of contract was essential in commercial transactions which commercial decision. ..... ) reliable and trustworthy in the light of its conduct in the context of the transaction in question. ..... mere difference in the prices offered by the two tenders may or may not be whether any public decisive in deciding interest is involved in intervening in such a commercial transaction. ..... again at paragraph-23 of the same judgment, the supreme court has held that the 2nd respondent came to the conclusion that the petitioner is not reliable and trustworthy in the context of a commercial transaction. .....