Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: electricity amendment act 2007 section 8 amendment of section 43 Court: madhya pradesh Page 6 of about 733 results (0.144 seconds)

Bhopal Sugar Industries Limited and anr. Vs. Sumitra Bai Battan and or ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : (1976)ILLJ452MP

..... harrows, seed drills. spray machines, dusting machines, etc., which are all driven by mechanical power and also by electricity. according to them irrigation also is being done by electrically driven pump. the petitioner neither by an amendment nor otherwise controverted these allegations in the return.7. from what has been stated above, there could be no dispute ..... the agricultural operations contrivances driven by steam or other mechanical power or by electricity are used,10. to take clause xxix of schedule ii of the act to mean that if tractor or other contrivances driven by steam or mechanical power or by electricity, are used at any stage of the farming, then all the ..... of which issue no. 1 which is as follows was treated as a preliminary issue;(1) whether battan was workman within the meaning of workmen's compensation act.after recording the evidence, as was led by the parties, the commissioner by the impugned order held that the deceased was a ' workman' and accordingly decided .....

Parbhudas Kishoredas Tobacco Products Ltd. and ors. Vs. Union of India ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : (2009)20VST853(MP)

..... is receiving the services cannot be made responsible for filing the return and paying the tax and such a position is certainly not contemplated or covered by the act. after amending the definition of 'assessee' there has been a change in relation to service provided by a clearing and forwarding agent, every person who engages a clearing and ..... the case of state of t.n. v. arooran sugar ltd. : air1997sc1815 . in the aforesaid case the apex court referred to the decision rendered in the case of west ramnad electric distribution co. ltd. v. state of madras : [1963]2scr747 , udai ram sharma v. union of india air 1968 sc 1138, hindustan gum & chemicals ltd. v. state of ..... . all the intervention applications are dismissed except those which were allowed earlier.14. at this juncture, it is thought apposite to reproduce sections 116 and 117:116 amendment of act 32 of 1994.--during the period commencing on and from the july 16, 1997 and ending with the october 16, 1998, the provisions of chapter v of .....

Commissioner of Sales Tax Vs. Sheocharan Radheshyam Sharma

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 1973MPLJ341; [1973]31STC480(MP)

..... him in the manufacture or processing of goods for sale or in mining or in the generation or distribution of electricity or any other form of power.5. it is to be noted that manufacture or processing in the amended provision is in respect of goods for sale. thus, the manufacture processing of goods is coupled with the ..... words had also been struck out in the registration certificates. clause (b) of sub-section (3) of section 8 of the central sales tax act, 1956, as it originally stood prior to the amendment, dated 1st october, 1958, was as follows :(b) in any other case, are goods of the class or classes specified in the certificate of ..... imposing the penalty will, we hope, take into consideration our observations that the striking out of the relevant phrase by the respondent was probably an inadvertent and unintentional act for which a severe penalty need not be imposed. with these observations we return the reference to the board of revenue for taking the consequential action. we further .....

Radhakishan Vs. Mohanlal and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1989MP240; 1989MPLJ199

..... provision of the c.p.c., 1908. if in view of the provisions of the civil p.c. 1908 as amended by the amendment act, 1976, the legislature considers it appropriate to provide for refund of court-fee paid on memorandum of appeal in cases of ..... remanded under rule 23a, which is distinct and different from rule 23 of order 41, c.p.c. the civil p. c. amendment act, 1976 has provided for a separate rule 23a to cover cases of remand other than those covered by rule 23. section 351 of ..... under the provisions of order 41, rule 23 of the code.6. by section 87(xi) of the code of civil procedure (amendment) act, 1976 (act no. 104 of 1976), a new rule 23a providing for remand in other cases has been added in the civil p. c., ..... amended by act of 1976. the applicant, therefore, cannot be held entitled to refund of court-fees, the instant case being a case of remand under order 41. rule 23a of the c.p.c. the above view taken by me is supported by a division bench decision of this court in kiran electricals .....

Oriental Insurance Company Vs. Balwant Singh and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 2000(1)MPHT253

..... construction suggested by the counsel for the applicant. it appears that the motor accidents claims tribunal can itself take cognizance of an accident. under section 158(6) of amendment act there is duty on the officer incharge of the police to give information received at the police station or to submit completed report of investigation within 30 days to ..... to be the ratio of air 1977 sc 282 in the case of the kerala state electricity board, trivandrum v. t.p. kunhaliumma. as already stated, 'the act' would be a special law within the meaning of section 29(2) of the limitation act, 1963 and would not cease to be the special law by omission of section 166(3 ..... in 1996 sc 2155.12. faced with the circumstance the learned counsel for the applicant invoked the application of article 137 of limitation act, 1963 on the foundation of the ruling reported in the case of the kerala state electricity board, trivandrum v. t.p. kunhatiumma, reported in air 1977 sc 282 (three judge bench), (2) in the case .....

General Manager, S.E.C.L. and anr. Vs. Gajanan Wadnekar

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 2006ACJ927; [2005(104)FLR618]; 2005(1)MPHT42; 2004(4)MPLJ340

..... 8 scc 254, the question which arose for determination was whether amendment of section 4 of the act made by the act 30 of 1995 with effect from 15-9-1995, enhancing the amount of compensation would be attracted ..... as compensation. it is note-worthy that the accident took place on 12-9-1995 and section 4 of the act has been amended with effect from 15-9-1995. this has been done by act no. 30 of 1995. by this amendment, figure of 'one thousand rupees' has been substituted by 'two thousand rupees' in explanation ii to section 4 of ..... the act. this amended provision would not apply to the case of the respondent as it has not been given retrospective effect. it is well settled that compensation is required to be determined on the basis of the law prevailing on the dale of accident.4. in kerala state electricity board v. valsala k., (1999) .....

Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Balwant Singh and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 2001ACJ246

..... construction suggested by the counsel for the applicant. it appears that the motor accidents claims tribunal can itself take cognizance of an accident. under section 158(6) of amendment act there is duty on the officer incharge of the police station to give information received at the police station or to submit completed report of investigation within 30 days ..... 1996 acj 1013 (sc).12. faced with the circumstance, the learned counsel for the applicant invoked the application of article 137 of limitation act, 1963, on the foundation of the ruling reported in the case of kerala state electricity board v. t.p. kunhaliumma, air 1977 sc 282 (three judges bench); (2) in the case of 5. rajan v. ..... without more. this appears to be the ratio in the case of kerala state electricity board v. t.p. kunhaliumma, air 1977 sc 282. as already stated, the act would be a special law within the meaning of section 29(2) of the limitation act, 1963, and would not cease to be the special law by omission of section .....

Ram Karan and anr. Vs. Vijayanand and Virjanand and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : (1995)IILLJ171MP

..... the happening of the accident and no cast iron rule can be laid down in regard to what is meant by 'as soon as practicable'.6. again in madhva pradesh electricity board v. manto bai (1990-i-llj-25), it was held that the insurance company cannot escape the liability. same is the view expressed by this court in om ..... any case, it is submitted by the learned counsel appearing for the insurance company that his clinets have been complying with the directions given by the commissioner under the act with promptness and as such the company should not be burdened with liability to pay the penalty.4. so far as the question of non-giving of notice to the ..... insurance company thus cannot escape the liability. it is liable to pay the penalty created under the act. however, the fact that the claimants were not consistent in their stand and the fact that the original claim filed on septemeber 25, 1987 was amended on december 26, 1992 is factor to be taken note of. the further fact that insurance company .....

Rajaram. Vs. Mukesh Kumar and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh Jabalpur

..... the respondents by the appellants in the written statement the ground of disclaimer of title the nuisance enumerated under section 12(1)(c) of the act for eviction was also taken in the plaint by way of amendment.5. in view of the pleadings of the parties, after framing the issues the evidence was recorded, on appreciation of the same, the trial ..... court decreed the suit in favour of the respondents on the grounds enumerated under section 12(1)(a),(c),(e) and (o) of the act. however, such suit was dismissed with respect of rs.918/- relating to electricity .....

Mst. Manmati and ors. Vs. Mohan and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1969MP7; 1969MPLJ125

..... agreement is admitted or proved to relate to the entire subject-matter of the suit but not otherwise. in the context of section 34 of the arbitration act, the supreme court held in gaya electric supply co. ltd. v. state of bihar, air 1953 sc 182 that the legal proceeding which is sought to be stayed must be in respect of ..... the reliefs expressly mentioned in sections 32 and 33 is not directly claimed in the suit, still the suit would be barred if it in any way involves enforcement, or amendment or modification, or setting aside of an award.6. having given my earnest attention to the arguments advanced on behalf of the applicant, i am of the view that ..... sought in the suit is one of partition and separate possession. none of the reliefs evisaged in section 32 of the act has been prayed for in the suit. the suit as instituted does not in any way involve enforcement or amendment or modification or setting aside of an award, and therefore shyamsingh's case, referred to above, does not help .....