Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: electricity amendment act 2007 section 8 amendment of section 43 Court: kerala Page 7 of about 1,294 results (0.133 seconds)

S.V. Purushothaman Vs. State of Kerala and ors.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : AIR1983Ker118

..... had been mentioned in that petition which, according to the petitioner, represented 'only a few instances of corruption practices by sri r. balakrishna pillai when he was acting as minister for electricity'. he staled that he was prepared to substantiate the allegations contained in the petition. he was 'confident that on a perusal of the records a prima facie case ..... requested that the writ petition may be posted to 11-10-1982. that request was granted. on 11-10-1982 it was submitted that the original petition was being amended and that the hearing may be adjourned to 13-10-1982. this was also granted. c. m. p. no. 22382 of 1982 was filed by the petitioner seeking ..... incorporation of two additional prayers. that was allowed by the order passed on the same day arguments on the original petition as amended were heard on that day.10. the prayers in the original petition before the amendment were the following:--'(i) to quash ext. p-3 reference order by the issue of a writ in the nature of certiorari .....

A.M. Mani Vs. Kerala State Electricity Board Represented by Its Secret ...

Court : Kerala

Reported in : (1967)IILLJ831Ker

..... 's proceedings ext. p-14, having been directed to or at least substantially influenced by the said directive, is also illegal. section 78a of the act introduced by the amending act 101 of 1956 reads as follows:'78a (1) in the discharge of its functions, the board shall be guided by such directions on questions of policy ..... -l g. p. dated 3rd april 19157. generally referred to as the 'guarantee g. p.' 2. under section 79(c) of the electricity supply act, 1948, (referred to hereafter as the act) the board was entitled to make rules to provide inter alia for the salaries and other conditions of service of its officers and servants. no ..... time for similar officers in the public works department and other departments.'10. clause 2 only guarantees continued employment in the same manner as government servants under the electricity department. the second part of clause 6 extends the benefits of increased emoluments which may be sanctioned for government officers 'from time to time'. the difference .....

Narayanan Sankaran Mooss Vs. State of Kerala and anr.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : AIR1965Ker253

..... been supported by mr. g. r. menon, learned counsel appearing for the 2nd respondent state electricity board--this will be a convenient stage to refer to the material provisions contained in sections 4 and 5 of the act. section 4 of the act deals with revocation or amendment of licenses. section 4(1) is as follows :'4. (1) the state government may, ..... if in its opinion the public interest so requires and after consulting the state electricity board, revoke a license, in any of the following cases, namely ..... one of the clauses (a) to (e) of section 4(1). in this connection it may be stated that sub-section (3) of section 4 was introduced by amendment act 32 of 1959. but it must also be stated that clauses (d) and (e) of section 4(1), which provide two additional grounds for taking action by way of .....

Kerala State Electricity Workers Federation Vs. Kerala State Electrici ...

Court : Kerala

Reported in : (1983)IILLJ30Ker

..... included in the definition of 'industrial dispute' in section 2(k) of the act because without that no dispute could be raised in respect of a dismissed, discharged or retrenched workman till the amendment of section 2(s) defining 'workman' by the amending act 36 of 1956. the supreme court has held that workmen can raise a dispute ..... rule 86 of the kerala government servants conduct rules adopted by the board by virtue of the powers vested in it under section 79c of the electricity supply act. the learned counsel contended that rule 86 prohibits a strike by the petitioners engineers and that the validity of that rule is not challenged in these ..... be said that there is no substance in the above contention of the learned counsel. considering the responsibility that the assistant engineers in charge of electrical sub-stations and electrical sections, they stand as a class distinct from the other assistant engineers who also joined the strike. so the suspension of these assistant engineers wihout .....

Pepsico India Holdings Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Kerala and ors.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : 2008(1)KLJ218

..... in the panchayat as one of its mandatory duties to safeguard public interest. it is stated that the panchayat raj act was enacted by the state legislature consequent on the constitution (seventy third amendment) act, 1992 for securing a greater measure of participation of the people in planned development and under article 243g the legislature ..... 20-04-2004 to show cause why steps shall not be taken to cancel ext. p1 order granting permission to the petitioner to install 2000 hp electric motor on the ground that the petitioner has beep indiscriminately extracting huge quantity of ground water thereby drying up a number of wells in and near the ..... the petitioner without the directions from the single window clearance state board constituted under the development act, 1999. petitioner has also filed i.a. no. 3089 of 2007 seeking a declaration that the provisions of the kerala panchayat raj act, 1994 are not applicable to the kanjikode unit of the petitioner and that the second respondent .....

S. Sajikumar and Others Vs. Kerala State Electricity Board, represente ...

Court : Kerala

..... the suitability of candidates for promotion within the same service. admittedly, the promotion to the post of junior assistant/cashier is either from the post of electrical worker or from the post of office attendants. hence there would be a distinction in service, as the former falls in the technical wing and the ..... respect to the principles to be followed in making appointments to such services. this power extends to recruitment proposed to service and posts under the electricity board and in making promotions and transfers from one service to another and on the suitability of candidates for such appointments, promotions or transfer. ..... that it is not the reasonableness of the prescription which arises for consideration, but whether the said amendment could have been made without consultation with the kerala public service commission. the kerala public service commission (additional functions) act, 1963; by section 3, mandates consultation with the psc inter-alia on all matters relating to .....

M/S.W.Electro Chemicals Vs. Kerala State Electricity Board

Court : Kerala

..... additional 7th respondent that the alleged concept of 'power allocation' is a misnomer in so far as the position is concerned after commencement of the electricity act, 2003. under the said enactment, no power allocation is envisaged or necessary, anybody will be getting power supply subject to availability and satisfaction ..... .1639 of2014......................................................................... dated this the 22nd may, 2015 judgment p.r. ramachandra menon, j: the denial on the part of the the respondent electricity board in giving power connection to the petitioner's industrial unit despite satisfying all the requirements under the relevant provisions based on the application submitted years ..... that it was open for the appellant to have challenged ext.r4(a) by way of appropriate proceedings, which admittedly was not done by amending the writ petition.12. during the course of hearing, the appellant pointed out that the accrued rights cannot be taken away, placing reliance on .....

Ajith Kumar.D Vs. CochIn Port Trust Rep.by Secretary and ors

Court : Kerala

..... experience was available in the post of junior engineer grade i and grade ii, then, promotions could be made from the category of junior engineer (electrical). the petitioner's promotion was made immediately after the amendment was brought into force, i.e, on 4.12.2000. the petitioner's claim is that at that point of time when the petitioner was ..... -in-chief v. m.a rajani & another (jt1997(4) sc212.9. the petitioner slept over his rights and made a representation only in the year 2007, i.e, by ext.p6 dated 27.6.2007. even then, the petitioner did not approach this court to get his grievance redressed. later to ext.p6, the respondents 3 and 4 were again promoted ..... dated2211.10 to the chairman cochin port trust ext.p11: photocopy of the reply under r.t.i. act bearing no.secy/rti/akd/2005/s dated2112.2010 ext.p12: photocopy of the probation declaration order of4h respondent as a.e.(electrical) bearing no.a4/probation/mechi/98/s.dated2711.03 ext.p13: photocopy of the order of the1t respondent .....

State of Kerala Vs. P.Haridasan

Court : Kerala

..... in government service qualifies for pension. the provisions of the ksr are adopted by the kseb, invoking its power to make regulations under section 79(c) of the electricity (supply) act, 1948. so the division bench held that, wherever the 'government' is used in the rules, the same has to be understood as kseb. if that be ..... family pension and dcrg. further, all conditions for the grant of these benefits applicable to government servants as laid down in part iii of the ksr, as amended from time to time, shall mutatis mutandis apply to the teachers of the private colleges affiliated to the university.10. chapter ii of part iii ksr deals with ..... , an aided college affiliated to the university of kerala, has filed the said writ petition seeking a writ of certiorari to quash ext.p6 letter dated 7/4/2007 of the director of collegiate education, thiruvananthapuram, the 3rd respondent herein, addressed to the deputy director of collegiate education, kollam, the 4th respondent herein, by which his .....

Kerala State Electricity Board Vs. Illippadical Parvathi Amma

Court : Kerala

Reported in : AIR1974Ker202

..... our attention to amarnath v. union of india, (air 1957 all 206) where it was held that article 181 applies also to applications under the arbitration. act, and that after the amendments effected in 1940 to articles 158 and 178. the view that article 181 applies only to applications under the code of civil procedure, is no longer tenable. ..... , a sum of rs. 1708-55 was paid on 30-4-68 as compensation for the damages caused, under section 10(d) of the indian telegraph act, 1885 read with section 51 of the indian electricity act. the respondent applied on 11-6-71 to the district judge, claiming enhanced compensation. this was under section 16(3) of the telegraph ..... the civil procedure code to a court. this is referred to. although the point was not decided by the privy council in hansraj gupta v. official liquidator dehra dun mussoorie electric tramway co. (air 1933 pc 63). the reason for this view was that all the applications provided under the third division of the first schedule of the 1908 .....