Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: electricity amendment act 2007 section 8 amendment of section 43 Court: andhra pradesh Page 11 of about 2,525 results (0.239 seconds)

Dec 14 1998 (HC)

Sri Venkateshwara Minerals, Bollaram, Medak Dist. Vs. A.P.S.E.B., Hyde ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1999(3)ALD699; 1999(2)ALT352

..... . it is required to notice that the respondent-board in exercise of the power conferred by section 49 of the electricity (supply) act, 1948 (act 54 of 1948) and all contractual, statutory and other powers made amendment by deleting a paragraph under part 'd' of lt category iii (industrial) and is substituted by the following:'the ..... f49, dated 28-12-1996, all those lt consumers whose cases would fall within the frame work of the amendment arc required to pay the revised tariff. the terms and conditions of supply framed under section 49 of the electricity (supply) act, 1948, themselves, are held to be statutory in character see : m/s. hyderabad vanaspathi lid v. ..... tariffs are applicable for supply of electricity to lt industrial consumers with a contracted load/connected load of 75 hp/55kw and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 21 1995 (HC)

Harayana Steel Industries Rep. by Its Proprietor, Sri Ajay Kumar Bansa ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1995(2)ALT659

..... levied at the point of first sale in the state and in view of the amended provision, tax is levied when the goods enumerated in the entry are purchased by an electric arc furnace unit or an induction furnace unit in the state at the point ..... merit in the writ petition to sustain the challenge regarding the validity of item 2-a of schedule iii of the act inserted by act 4 of 1989.6. it is needless to point out that dismissal of this writ petition does not preclude the petitioner ..... so, the petitioner filed this writ petition challenging the constitutional validity of entry 2-a (i) and (ii) of schedule iii of the act introduced by act 4 of 1989 by bifurcating entry 2 into 2 (i) to (ix) and (xi) to (xvi) thus deleting item 2(x) ..... utilising iron scrap. for the assessment year 1989-90 sales-tax was assessed under the andhra pradesh general sales tax act, 1957 (for short 'the act'). the order of the assessment was revised by the deputy commissioner and that order of revision is the subject matter .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 03 2006 (HC)

S. Prabhavathi Vs. Rohini Kilaru and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2006(5)ALD606; 2006(5)ALT264

..... the same reads as under:144. application for restitution:- (1) where and in so far as a decree or an order (high lighted portions were inserted by central amendment act 66 of 1956) is varied or reversed in any appeal, revision or other proceeding or is set aside or modified in any suit instituted for the purpose, the court ..... p-1 gift deed in favour of his daughter. the inference and conclusion drawn by the courts below, therefore, on prima facie considerations cannot be faulted. further, the electricity bills produced by the plaintiff; exs.p-7 and p-12- are found to be in respect of other property situated at rajarajeswari nagar. thus the plaintiff failed ..... 1999 filed by the mother of the plaintiff against fifteen flat owners was also dismissed by the special court on 28-1-2004 and that the permission for construction, electricity service connection, obtained by the plaintiff relate to the property in rajarajeswari nagar.4. before the trial court, the plaintiff marked exs.p-1 to p-12 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 22 2014 (TRI)

The Executive Officer, Sri Bramaramba Mallikharjuna Devasthanam and An ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

..... . the matter does not come even under the explanation which was introduced on the same day i.e. on 15.3.2003 by way of the amendment by the same amendment act, as it is nobody's case that the goods bought and used by the respondent herein and the services availed by the respondent were exclusively for the ..... of person u/s 2(1)(d) r/w sec. 2(1)(m) of the consumer protection act opined that the supply of electricity to consumer is a service. 17. the honble supreme court in birla technologies ltd. versus neutral glass and allied industries ltd. reported in cdj 2010 sc- ..... the transaction as rightly contended by the learned counsel for the appellants is not a transaction which can be termed as sale of goods. the honble supreme court considered whether electricity is goods or service in karnataka power transmission corporation vs. ashok iron works pvt. ltd reported in (2009) 3 scc 240 - their lordships after considering the definition .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 02 2001 (HC)

Tatineni Tulasi Lavanya Vs. Gogineni Sujatha and Others</B>

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2001(2)ALD110; 2001(2)ALT229

..... and atrani municipal council (supra) in the light of definition of an application contained in section 2(b) of the limitation act, 1963 which indicates the object of the act to include petitions, original or otherwise, under special laws in kerala state electricity board v. t.p. kunhaliumma, : [1977]1scr996 . after referring to the previous history and the interpretation of old article 181 ..... admit of the introduction of principles or the provisions of law contained in the limitation act and held as follows:'...the indian limitation act of 1963 is an act to consolidate and amend thelaw of limitation of suits and other proceedings and for purposes connected therewith. the provisions of this act will apply to all civil proceedings and some special criminal proceedings which can be .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 05 2003 (HC)

Sree Rayalaseema Alkalies and Allied Chemicals Limited Vs. A.P. State ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2003(6)ALD819; 2003(5)ALT323

..... terms of the agreement and terms and conditions of the supply notified by the board from time to time or by any provision of law touching the agreement including the electricity (supply) act, 1948 and the rules framed there under. it specifically enables the board to vary terms and conditions of supply by special or general proceedings. therefore, there is no ..... from the operation of b.p.ms.no.298 dated 30th march, 1988 adding item no. 9 in the list of h.t. category-iii power intensive tariff consumers, the amendment to b.p. ms. no. 671 (commercial) dated 10.6.1987 bringing the petitioner's unit under h.t. category-iii does not suffer from any legal infirmity or ..... power supply was given on 20.1.1987.4. it is further stated that subsequently the corporation issued another proceedings in b.p. ms. no. 298 dated 30.3.1988 amending the earlier b.p. ms. no. 671 and by virtue of which, the caustic soda industry also was included under the power intensive industries under category-iii and since .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 26 2009 (HC)

G.V.S. Rama Krishna and ors. Vs. A.P. Transco Rep. by Its Managing Dir ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR2009AP158; 2009(3)ALT502; 2009LC(AP)517

..... respondents have illegally entered into possession of their land, it is stated that the respondents have followed the procedure contemplated under the provisions of the electricity act, 2003 and a gazette notification was issued on 17-07-2007. since no objections were received pursuant to the said gazette notification, the transco decided to proceed ahead with the scheme. though the plea that initially ..... state government.(3) the provisions of the enactments specified in the schedule, not inconsistent with the provisions of this act, shall apply to the states in which such enactments are applicable.(4) the central government may, as and when considered necessary, by notification, amend the schedule.(5) save as otherwise provided in sub-section (2), the mention of particular matters in that .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 28 2007 (HC)

Future Builders Co-operative Housing Society Vs. S. Malla Reddy and or ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2008(3)ALD231; 2008(2)ALT520

..... earlier written statement, he filed ia. nos. 415 and 416 of 2000 and as final orders in those petitions were passed only on 15.03.2007, first defendant filed this petition seeking amendment of the plaint (sic. written statement) and so it cannot be said that there was any wilful delay on the part of the first defendant ..... contest the applications made by the defendants.16. in view of the ratio in satyadhyan ghosal case (11 supra), arjun singh case (12 supra) and the united provinces electric supply co. ltd case (13 supra) successive applications for the same relief cannot be permitted, and they can even be rejected as an abuse of the process of ..... from interfering with its possession thereon, inter alia alleging that it is a society founded by promoters including the first defendant and is registered under the cooperative societies act and one of its objects is to acquire or purchase land for the benefit of its members and render it fit for habitation. before its registration, its promoter .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 07 2004 (HC)

A.P. State Electricity Board and ors. Vs. Sree Rayalaseema Alkalies an ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2004(6)ALT421

..... : air1996ap212 a division bench of this court held:'therefore we have no hesitation in holding that the government in exercise of the powers in section 78-a of the electricity (supply) act, 1948, have been taking policy decisions as to the entitlement of the power concession to the industries and issuing orders reckoning the date of extension of concessions as the date ..... in b.p.ms.no. 311 dated 6-4-1977 the petitioner-unit is eligible to claim 25% rebate. he further contended that the board has no power to amend the list of 65 ineligible industries appended to g.o.ms.no. 224 dated 9-3-1976 and therefore the board's proceedings b.p.ms.no. 1098 dated 8 ..... be classified under ht category-iii and the bills are issued as per tariff classification under ht category-iii as notified in bpms. no. 671 dated 10-6-1987 as amended in bpms. no. 298 dated 30-3-1988. therefore, the respondent-board prayed to dismiss the writ petition.4. the petitioner filed a detailed reply affidavit stating that the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 10 2012 (TRI)

Bomiidala Sri Raja Vara Prasad Vs. the Superintending Engineer Operati ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

..... that it has no jurisdiction to entertain the complaint. the complaint was dismissed holding that the special tribunal constituted under the provisions of the indian electricity (ap amendment) act,2000 and the electricity act,2003 to decide the disputes relating to assessment. 2. the appellant purchased a house at guntur from its owner on 17.10.2005 and got ..... transferred the electricity service connection number 19880 on 14.03.2007 and prior to the mutation of his name in the records of the respondents, he leased out ..... the matter does not come even under the explanation which was introduced on the same day i.e. on 15.3.2003 by way of the amendment by the same amendment act, as it is nobody's case that the goods bought and used by the respondent herein and the services availed by the respondent were exclusively for .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //