Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: electricity amendment act 2007 section 21 amendment of section 181 Court: supreme court of india Page 88 of about 5,645 results (0.283 seconds)

Nov 02 1999 (SC)

M/S Gujarat Composite Ltd. and anr. Vs. Ranip Nagarpalika and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2000SC135; (2000)1GLR905; JT1999(9)SC62; 1999(7)SCALE19; (1999)8SCC675; 2000(1)LC92(SC)

..... tabular aluminate with calcium aluminate cement as a binder. these mortars, called grog, are sprayed under pressure to form the linings of the steel industry's basic oxygen furnaces, electric ore furnaces, steel ladles and coke ovens, and for steam boilers, rotary kilns, and many other high temperature applications.6. the case of the respondents initiallywas that 'grog ..... there is some defect in the phraseology used by the legislature, the court cannot aid the legislature's defective phrasing of an act or add and amend or, by construction, make up deficiencies which are left in the act. even where there is a casus omissus, it is for others than the courts to remedy the defect. in p.k. ..... legislature. but it is certainly not the duty of the court to stretch the words used by the legislature to fill in gaps or omissions in the provisions of an act.' reference was also made to nalinakhya bysack v. shyam sunder haldar and ors. : [1953]4scr533 where it was said that 'it was not competent to any .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 13 2008 (SC)

Karnataka State Financial Corporation Vs. N. Narasimahaiah and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2008SC1797; 2008(2)ALLMR(SC)827; [2008]143CompCas176(SC); [2008(3)JCR142(SC)]; JT2008(4)SC183; 2008(4)KarLJ56; (2008)5MLJ713(SC); 2008(4)SCALE473; (2008)5SCC176; 2008(3)CivilLJ896; 2008(3)AIRKarR280; 2008AIRSCW2480

..... ashok lanka v. rishi dixit : air2005sc2821 and j. srinivasa rao v. govt. of a.p. and anr. : 2006(13)scale27 and southern petrochemical industries co. ltd. v. electricity inspector and e.t.i.o. and ors. : air2007sc1984 ] 31. the legislative intent, in our opinion, is manifest. the intention of the parliament in enacting sections 29 and 31 ..... of section 31 also refers to industrial concern and not the surety. the legislative intent, therefore, to our mind, is clear and unambiguous.subsequent amendment - effect28. sub-section (1a) of section 32 of the act lays down a procedure when clause (aa) of sub-section (1) of section 31 thereof is invoked. sub-section (4a) of section 31 ..... attempt on the part of the court while interpreting the provisions of a statute should, therefore, be to pose a question as to why one provision has been amended and the other was not? why one terminology has been used while inserting a statutory provision and a different clause in another? it is well-known that casus .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 28 2009 (SC)

Biecco Lawrie Ltd. and anr. Vs. State of West Bengal and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2010SC142; JT2009(10)SC340; (2009)IVLLJ644SC; (2009)8MLJ451(SC); 2009(10)SCALE334; (2009)10SCC32:2009AIRSCW5779

..... reconsideration?19. while dealing with the domestic inquiry and misbehaviour by an employee at one inquiry and refusal to attend the next inquiry, this court in management of eastern electric & trading co. v. baldev lal : (1975)iillj367sc : (1975) 4 scc 684, observed that the misbehaviour by an employee at one inquiry and refusal to ..... which was not considered by the appellants on account that the respondent was on earlier occasion also charged with similar grounds and was given a chance to amend his conduct. it was alleged by the appellants that the respondent had developed a habit of misconducting himself in an undesirable manner despite opportunities being given ..... natural justice is attracted where there is some right which is likely to be affected by any act of the administration including a legitimate expectation. (see: ashoka smokeless coal india (p) ltd. v. union of india and ors. : (2007)2scc640 : (2007) 2 scc 640. the procedure to be followed is not a matter of secondary importance .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 12 1998 (SC)

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Kerala State Industrial Development Cor ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : (1998)149CTR(SC)493

..... of the various high courts is in line with the view expressed by the kerala high court but the relevant clause (viii) of section 36(1) of the act has also subsequently been amended so as to bring it in line with the view of the patna and kerala high courts. the decision of the karnataka high court does not appear to ..... income has to be computed in accordance with the provisions of sections 30 to 43a except section 36(1)(viii) of the act. in arriving at this decision, the high court relied upon the observations of this court of cambay electric supply industrial co. ltd. v. cit : [1978]113itr84(sc) .3. the view which was taken by the kerala high court ..... in respect of the assessment year 1978-79 :'whether, the tribunal was right in law in holding that the statutory deduction under section 36(1)(viii) of the income tax act, 1961 should be calculated on the total income before deduction of the amount allowable under the section ?'2. the kerala high court came to the conclusion that in computing .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 01 2007 (SC)

Parthiban Blue Metal Etc. Vs. the Member Secy. T.N. Polln. Cont. Bd. a ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2007(2)AWC1062(SC); (SCSuppl)2007(2)CHN7; 2007(2)SCALE424

..... was declared as follows:in the order first read above, in adherence to the supreme court order in c.a. no. 10732/95, the government issued amendment to rule 36(1) of tamil nadu minor mineral concession rules, 1959 to the effect that no quarrying shall be done within a radial distance of 500 ..... were required to remit a sum of rs. 1750/- each towards consent fee under the acts, which was also paid. appellants were granted permission by the commissioner, panchayat union for construction of a shed and installation of 25 hp electric motor to run the units and as per the approved plan the shed was constructed and ..... of running the units. after water (prevention and control of pollution) act, 1974 (in short the water act')] and the air (prevention and control of pollution) act, 1981 (in short the 'air act') came into force appellants applied for consent from the concerned authorities under these acts. considering the applications the district environmental engineer called for some particulars and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 10 2009 (SC)

T.N. Godavarman Thirumalpad Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... modification of this court's order dated 19.4.2004 passed in i.a. no. 966 and 1012. the matter relates to the construction of the lower subansiri hydro electric project by nhpc. the cec has made some recommendations and subject to these recommendations the work has to be completed in the entire area of lower subansiri project which will ..... four weeks. the state shall arrange to have an industrial estate and take urgent steps to this effect and shall also take steps to see that there shall be appropriate amendment to the saw mills rules of 1991. it shall file an affidavit to this effect.7. list on 21.8.2009.i.a. no. 1362-63 in 966 & ..... released in the respective bank accounts of the states/uts immediately for taking up site specific works already approved by the moef while granting prior approval under the forest (conservation) act, 1980. (c) an amount upto 5% of the amount released to the state campa may also be released and utilized by the national campa advisory council, for monitoring .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 08 2010 (SC)

Ashok Kumar Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... `or any time after marriage' and `in connection with the marriage of the said parties' were introduced by amending act 63 of 1984 and act 43 of 1986 with effect from 02.10.1985 and 19.11.1986 respectively. these amendments appear to have been made with the intention to cover all demands at the time, before and even after the ..... malhotra v. k.c. bhandari [(1988) supp. 1 scc 424], held that furnishing of a list of ornaments and other household articles such as refrigerator, furniture and electrical appliances etc., to the parents or guardians of the bride, at the time of settlement of the marriage, prima facie amounts to demand of dowry within the meaning of ..... satisfy the essential ingredients of the offence.20. similarly, reference was also made to the judgment of this court in the case of appasaheb v. state of maharashtra [(2007) 9 scc 721], to substantiate the contention that there was no co-relation between giving or taking of the property with the marriage of the parties and, as such .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 16 2012 (SC)

Pathan HussaIn BashA. Vs. Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution and o ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... time after marriage and in connection with the marriage of the said parties were introduced by the amending act 63 of 1984 and act 43 of 1986 with effect from 2-10- 1985 and 19-11-1986 respectively. these amendments appear to have been made with the intention to cover all demands at the time, before and even after ..... sudan malhotra v. kishore chand bhandari, 1988 supp. scc 424 held that furnishing of a list of ornaments and other household articles such as refrigerator, furniture and electrical appliances, etc. to the parents or guardians of the bride, at the time of settlement of the marriage, prima facie amounts to demand of dowry within the ..... these are the provisions relating to human behaviour and, therefore, cannot be given such a narrower meaning, which would defeat the very purpose of the provisions of the act. of course, these are penal provisions and must receive strict construction. but, even the rule of strict construction requires that the provisions have to be read in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 13 2013 (SC)

Assistant Commercial Taxes Officer Vs. M/S Parekh Enterprises

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... present case. in fact, our view in the case of m/s. guljag industries (supra) finds support from the amendment made in section 78(5) vide act no.7 of 2002 w.e.f. 22.3.2002 by which the expression ".person in-charge of the goods". ..... appeal is no more res integra in view of the judgment of this court in the case of assistant commercial taxes officers vs. bajaj electricals limited, reported in (2009) 1 scc 308.in the said decision, this court has observed: if one reads sub-section (5 ..... goods or a person authorized in writing by such owner or person in-charge of the goods".. it is once again emphasized that act no.7 of 2002 is an exercise in substitution. therefore, the legislature seeks to clarify the expression ".person in-charge of the ..... that the revenue could not have directed the owner of the vehicle to pay the penalty imposed under section 78(5) of the act.4. being aggrieved by the aforesaid finding and the conclusion reached by the high court, the assistant commercial taxes officer, bhiwadi .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 31 2014 (SC)

Occupational Health and Safety Association Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... (pva), cellulose, polyacrylonitrile, glass fibres, graphite are available, the use of which may be explored. . compliance with the provisions of the environment (protection) act and its amendments from time to time applicable for the power plants with respect to emission and discharge, ash utilization and hazardous waste management should be ensured to protect the ambient ..... requiring nearly 440 million tons of coal per year. we have about 130 cftpps in india. the thermal power plants generate about two-third of the electricity consumed in india, while 54.3% of the energy demand is met by coal fired power generation. the nioh in its report in 2011 has ..... act, the air (prevention and control of pollution) act, environmental protection act, etc. are in place, but the lack of proper health delivery system, evaluation of occupational health status of workers, their safety and protection cause serious occupational health hazards.3. the petitioner herein filed i.a. no.1 of 2005 and 2 of 2007 .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //