Court : Karnataka
- 1 - R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE29H DAY OF AUGUST, 2024 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.SOMASHEKAR AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE UMESH M ADIGA WRIT PETITION No.27220 OF2023(GM-RES) CONNECTED WITH WRIT PETITION NO.670 OF2024(GM-RES) IN W.P.27220/2023 BETWEEN: SRI. BASANAGOUDA R PATIL (YATNAL) S/O RAMANAGOUDA B PATIL AGED ABOUT59YEARS OCC MLA, VIJAYAPURA CONSTITUENCY R/AT OLD IB, STATION ROAD VIJAYAPURA58610, KARNATAKA. PETITIONER (BY SRI. DALWAI VENKATESH - ADVOCATE) AND:1. STATE OF KARNATAKA THE DEPUTY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT HOME DEPARTMENT (CRIMES, PRISONS & CINEMA) VIKAS SOUDHA, BENGALURU56000.2. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ANTI CORRUPTION BUREAU NO36 BELLARY ROAD GANGANAGAR, BENGALURU56003 REP. BY ITS SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE3 SRI D K SHIVAKUMAR S/O S K KEMPEGOWDA AGE60YEARS, OCC:MLA - 2 - ADD: NO252 18TH CROSS SADSASHIVA NAGAR BENGALURU56008.4. THE ADDL. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE KARNATAKA LOKAYUKTA M S BUILDING, BANGALORE-01. RESPONDENTS (BY S...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE29H DAY OF AUGUST, 2024 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.SOMASHEKAR AND THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA COMMERCIAL APPEAL NO.136 OF2022CONNECTED WITH COMMERCIAL APPEAL NO.171 OF2022IN COMAP NO.136/2022 BETWEEN: NAVAYUGA ENGINEERING COMPANY HAVING ITS OFFICE AT NO.379 ROAD NO.10, JUBILEE HILLS HYDERABAD-500033 REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY MR A S R MURTHY. APPELLANT (BY SRI. DHYAN CHINNAPPA AND SRI. C K NANDA KUMAR SR. COUNSELS FOR SRI. HIDAYATHULLA M H - ADVOCATE) AND:1. . BANGALORE METRO RAIL CORPORATION LIMITED BMTC COMPLEX, 3RD FLOOR K H ROAD, SHANTINAGAR BENGALURU-560027 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR. 2 . SRI L V SREERANGARAJU NO.537, JESHTA 3RD MAIN HOSAKEREHALLI CROSS BANASHANKARI3D STAGE BENGALURU-560085. 2 3 . SRI R RAJAMANI FLAT NO.3, RAMPRIYA AE-172 11TH MAIN ROAD, ANNANAGAR CHENNAI-600040. 4 . SRI T D MANAMOHAN NO.10, KAVERY THARALABALU ENCLAVE NEAR YELAHANKA OLD TOWN TRAFFIC POLICE S...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE29H DAY OF AUGUST, 2024 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.SOMASHEKAR AND THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA COMMERCIAL APPEAL NO.136 OF2022CONNECTED WITH COMMERCIAL APPEAL NO.171 OF2022IN COMAP NO.136/2022 BETWEEN: NAVAYUGA ENGINEERING COMPANY HAVING ITS OFFICE AT NO.379 ROAD NO.10, JUBILEE HILLS HYDERABAD-500033 REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY MR A S R MURTHY. APPELLANT (BY SRI. DHYAN CHINNAPPA AND SRI. C K NANDA KUMAR SR. COUNSELS FOR SRI. HIDAYATHULLA M H - ADVOCATE) AND:1. . BANGALORE METRO RAIL CORPORATION LIMITED BMTC COMPLEX, 3RD FLOOR K H ROAD, SHANTINAGAR BENGALURU-560027 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR. 2 . SRI L V SREERANGARAJU NO.537, JESHTA 3RD MAIN HOSAKEREHALLI CROSS BANASHANKARI3D STAGE BENGALURU-560085. 2 3 . SRI R RAJAMANI FLAT NO.3, RAMPRIYA AE-172 11TH MAIN ROAD, ANNANAGAR CHENNAI-600040. 4 . SRI T D MANAMOHAN NO.10, KAVERY THARALABALU ENCLAVE NEAR YELAHANKA OLD TOWN TRAFFIC POLICE S...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
1 R Reserved on :01. 08.2024 Pronounced on :28. 08.2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE28H DAY OF AUGUST, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION No.4914 OF2024BETWEEN: THE STATE OF KARNATAKA STATE BY SIT CID REPRESENTED BY THE SPECIAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BENGALURU 560 001. ... PETITIONER (BY PROF. SRI RAVI VARMA KUMAR, SPL.PP A/W SRI B.N.JAGADEESHA, SPL.PP) AND: SRI REVANNA H. D., S/O H.D.DEVE GOWDA AGED ABOUT66YEARS MEMBER OF LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY HOLENARSIPURA CONSTITUENCY STATE OF KARNATAKA RESIDING AT CHENNAMBIKA NILAYA CHENNAMBIKA CIRCLE HOLENARSIPURA, HASSAN - 573 211. ... RESPONDENT (BY SRI C.V.NAGESH, SR. ADVOCATE A/W., 2 SRI SOMEGOWDA A. N., ADVOCATE AND SRI MADHAV B.KASHYAP, ADVOCATE) THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION4392) OF CR.P.C., PRAYING TO SET ASIDE AND CANCEL THE IMPUGNED ORDER OF GRANT OF BAIL U/S439OF CR.P.C. DATED1305.2024, TO THE RESPONDENT/ACCUSED NO.1 IN CRL.MISC.NO.4229/2...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
1 R Reserved on :06. 08.2024 Pronounced on :28. 08.2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE28H DAY OF AUGUST, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION No.942 OF2024BETWEEN: STATE OF KARNATAKA BY THE SPECIAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, IN SPL.C. 828/2018, (PAPER TOWN PS-BADRAVATI-CID POLICE VERSUS SANGAMESH AND OTHERS), PENDING ON THE FILE OF CCH82 SPECIAL COURT FOR MPS AND MLAS- BANGALORE, C/O. CID OFFICE, BANGALORE AND ALTERNATIVELY M.S.SHYAMSUNDAR, SPP, A1, LE-CHATEAU, 90, INFANTRY ROAD, BENGALURU 560 001. ... PETITIONER (BY SRI M.S.SHYAM SUNDAR, SPL.PP) AND:1. . SHRI. SANGAMESH S/O. BELLADA KOTRAPPA, AGED ABOUT53YEARS, RESIDING AT PARVATI KRUPA, 2 OSM ROAD, OLD TOWN, BADRAVATHI, SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT, BADRAVATHI 577 201. 2 . SHRI B.K.MOHAN, S/O. BELLADA KOTRAPPA, AGED ABOUT63YEARS, RESIDING AT PARVATI KRUPA, OSM ROAD, OLD TOWN, BADRAVATHI, SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT, BADRAVATHI 577 201. 3 . SHRI GANESH S/O. SANGAMESH, AGED ABOUT37YEARS, ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
2024 INSC634REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). OF2024(Arising out of SLP(Civil) No(s). 13484-13488 of 2019) K. NIRMALA & ORS. .APPELLANT(S) VERSUS CANARA BANK & ANR. .RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). OF2024(Arising out of SLP(Civil) No(s). 19877 of 2019) CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). OF2024(Arising out of SLP(Civil) No(s). 23500-23501 of 2019) CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). OF2024(Arising out of SLP(Civil) No(s). 13453 of 2019) JUDGMENT Mehta, J.1. Heard.2. Leave granted. 13. This batch of appeals, which involves identical questions of fact and law, arises from the judgments delivered by the Division Bench of the High Court of Karnataka, as listed in the table below. Given the similarities, the appeals have been heard together and are being decided collectively. SLP No(s). Writ Date of Concerned Community Appeal Impugned Respondents/ (Scheduled No(s). Judgement Employer Caste/Scheduled Tribe) Special Writ Appeal 24th April, The Canara Kotegara (S...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 9059-9061 OF20222024 INSC659REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 9059-9061 OF2022V.S. PALANIVEL . APPELLANT Versus P. SRIRAM, CS, LIQUIDATOR, ETC. . RESPONDENTS JUDGMENT HIMA KOHLI, J.A. BACKDROP1 The appellant - V.S. Palanivel (shareholder/former Managing Director of M/s Sri Lakshmi Hotel Private Limited) has filed the present appeals against the judgment and order dated 16th September, 2022, passed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, Chennai Bench1 in three Company Appeals2 preferred by him. The details of the said Company Appeals are (i) Company Appeal No.336 of 2021 (subject matter of Civil Appeal No.9059 of 2022) filed against the common judgment dated 17th November, 2021 passed by the National Company Law Tribunal, Chennai Bench3 rejecting an application4 1 In short Tribunal 2 Company Appeal (AT) (CH) (Ins} No.336 of 2021; Company Appeal (AT) (CH) (Ins) No.339 of 2021 and Company Appeal (AT) (CH) (In...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE2024INSC637IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.OF2024(@ SLP (Crl.) No.5416/2024) PREM PRAKASH APPELLANT(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT RESPONDENT(s) JUDGMENT K.V. Viswanathan, J.1. Leave granted.2. The present appeal challenges the judgment dated 22.03.2024 of the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi in B.A. No.9863 of 2023. By the said judgment, the High Court dismissed the bail application of the appellant. The appellant sought for regular bail in connection with ECIR Case No.5 of 2023 in ECIR-RNZO/10/2023 (hereinafter referred to as ECIR Case No.5 of 2023) registered for the offence 1 under Sections 3 and 4 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (hereinafter referred to as PMLA) and pending before the Court of Special Judge, PMLA, Ranchi. Brief Facts 3. The predicate offence on the basis of which ECIR No.5 of 2023 was recorded on 07.03.2023 is an FIR bearing Sadar P.S. Case No.399 of 2022 r...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE2024INSC635IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 7440-7441 OF2012NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL AND ANOTHER .APPELLANT(S) VERSUS MANJU TOMAR AND OTHERS ..RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 7442-7444 OF2012JUDGMENT Mehta, J.1. Heard.2. These appeals filed by New Delhi Municipal Council1 (hereinafter being referred to as NDMC) and Delhi Sikh Gurdwara Management Committee2 (hereinafter being referred to as DSGMC) arise out of a common judgment dated 9th December, 2009 passed by the High Court of Delhi in Letters Patent Appeal 1 Civil Appeal No(s). 7440-7441 of 2012 2 Civil Appeal No(s). 7442-7444 of 2012 1 Nos. 441 and 442 of 2009 and hence, they have been heard and are being decided together. Civil Appeal Nos. 7442-7444 of 2012 3. Facts in a nutshell relevant and essential for disposal of the appeals are noted hereinbelow.4. The appellant-DSGMC was managing and operating a school, namely, Khalsa Boys Primary School (in short school), co...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE2024INSC641IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 9927 OF2024(Arising out of S.L.P.(C) No.17102 of 2021) MHABEMO OVUNG & ORS. Appellant (s) VERSUS M. MOANUNGBA & ORS. Respondent(s) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 9928 OF2024(Arising out of S.L.P.(C) No.1136 OF2022 THE STATE OF NAGALAND & ORS. Appellant (s) VERSUS M. MOANUNGBA & ORS. Respondent(s) JUDGMENT Rajesh Bindal, J.1. Leave granted. Page 1 of 112. The issue under consideration in the present appeals is regarding inter se seniority of the incumbents appointed to the post of Junior Engineer on direct recruitment basis and those whose posts of Sectional Officer, Grade-I, were upgraded to Junior Engineer.3. Final seniority list of Junior Engineers was circulated on 26.03.2018 showing the seniority position of the incumbents manning the posts from two different sources. Aggrieved against the seniority list, Sectional Officers, Grade-I, who were redesignated/upgraded as Junior Engineers chall...
Tag this Judgment!