Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: either Court: uttaranchal Page 8 of about 1,360 results (0.009 seconds)

Ram Saran Nautiyal Vs. State of Uttaranchal and ors.

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : 2006CriLJ1713

..... relates to the investigation into non-cognizable offences whereas section 202 only enables a magistrate to have the assistance of an investigation conducted either by the police or by any other person, for the limited purpose of deciding whether or not there is sufficient ground for proceeding with the complaint. ..... it is permissible for any superior officer of police to take over the investigation from such officer in charge of the police station either suo motu or on the direction of the superior officer or even that of the government. .....

Roshan Lal Vs. State of Uttaranchal and ors.

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : 2005CriLJ2031

..... he also submitted that the record reveal that the learned sessions judge has not passed any order of remand as envisaged by the provision of section 309 of the 'code' and there being no valid remand in either of the above two provisions of the 'code' the detention of the petitioner has altogether been illegal resulting which by a writ in the nature of habeas corpus the respondents are liable to be directed to forthwith release the petitioner ..... 2402/2004 under sections 302, 307, 452 and 504, ipc has been alleged to be illegal for want of valid remand either under section 209 or 309 of the code of criminal procedure (for short 'code').2. .....

Naresh, and ors. Vs. the State of Uttaranchal.

Court : Uttaranchal

..... and if the offence is punishable with imprisonment for life, or with imprisonment which may extend to ten years, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, and shall also be liable to fine; if punishable with less than ten years' imprisonment.and if the offence is punishable with imprisonment for any term not ..... , or with that intention gives any information respecting the offence which he knows or believes to be false; if a capital offence.shall, if the offence which he knows or believes to have been committed is punishable with death, be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine;if punishable with imprisonment for life. .....

Manoj and ors. Vs. State of Uttaranchal and anr.

Court : Uttaranchal

..... to the magistrate under section 173(2)(i) is placed before him several situations arise: the report may conclude that an offence appears to have been committed by a particular person or persons and in such a case, the magistrate may either (1) accept the report and take cognizance of the offence and issue process, or (2) may disagree with the report and drop the proceedings, or (3) may direct further investigation under section 156(3) and require the ..... the magistrate may either (1) he may accept the report and drop the proceedings; or (2) he may disagree with the report and take the view that there is sufficient ground for further proceeding, take cognizance of the offence and issue .....

Rashtriya Inter College Vs. State of Uttaranchal and ors.

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : 2003(1)AWC845(UHC)

..... in-action on the part of the inspector either deliberate or otherwise may frustrate the object of the provision itself.'7. .....

Darshan Singh Rawat Vs. State of Uttaranchal and anr.

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : (2004)1UPLBEC30

..... , which is quoted below :--'an order of transfer of an employee is a part of the service conditions and such order of transfer is not required to be interfered with lightly by a court of law in exercise of its discretionary jurisdiction unless the court finds that either the order is mala fide or that the service rules prohibit such transfer or that the authorities, who issued the order, had not the competence to pass the order.'6. .....

Govind Ram Vs. State of Uttaranchal

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : 2003CriLJ4189

..... on 8-7-1998 and there could also be difference of about 7 or 8 hours in the duration of the death on either side. .....

Pratap Singh Vs. State of Uttaranchal

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : 2001CriLJ3154

..... there is no oral evidence either to back his this bald assertion. .....

Jasvinder Singh and anr. Vs. State of Uttaranchal

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : 2005CriLJ3384

..... therefore, either on the basis of delay in sending the f.i.r. .....

State of U.P., thro' E.E., Irrigation Research Institute Vs. Presiding ...

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : [2005(104)FLR193]; (2005)IILLJ66UC

..... only when the workman worked with hammer, sickle or pen, but must necessarily comprehend all those days during which he was in the employment of the employer and for which he had been paid wages either under express or implied contract of service or by compulsion of statute, standing orders etc. .....