Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: either Court: chennai Page 8 of about 128,218 results (0.038 seconds)

Feb 28 2008 (HC)

Manikandan and ors. Vs. the Chairman, Tamil Nadu Uniformed Services Re ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2008)2MLJ1203; 2009(3)SLJ259(NULL); 2008(5)AIRKarR61

..... still be considered as disqualified for selection to the police service of the state and that the same cannot be termed as illegal or unjustified; and(b) that the failure of a person to disclose in the application form, either his involvement in a criminal case or the pendency of a criminal case against him, would entitle the appointing authority to reject his application on the ground of concealment of a material fact, irrespective of the ultimate outcome of ..... that the commission shall be consulted where such consultation is necessary, before any orders are made in any case under this rule.therefore, the focus of the government, as an employer, either at the time of recruitment or during the course of employment, has always been on the conduct rather than on the ultimate outcome including conviction. ..... we also hold that the non selection of the writ petitioners or the rejection of their candidatures, by the respondents, either on the basis of their involvement in criminal case or on the basis of the suppression of their involvement, is perfectly valid and justified.in answer to the reference made to the full bench, we hold- (a) that by virtue of explanation 1 to ..... that the imposition of a punishment and the denial of promotion did not amount to double jeopardy and (ii) that the conviction by a criminal court and the disciplinary proceedings initiated either on the basis of conduct which led to the conviction or on pure questions of misconduct, did not amount to double jeopardy.29. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 25 2001 (HC)

Chennai Customs House Agent Licence Owners, Assn. Vs. C.C., Chennai

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 2002(140)ELT27(Mad)

..... ' association, if any, registered will have a right to make a representation or to be consulted by the commissioner of customs when the rates are sought to be fixed by the commissioner and it has no other role to play, nor it has any other scope either under the customs house agents licensing regulation, 1984 or under the customs act or the rules framed thereunder.21. ..... it is also to be pointed out that the very customs house agents' licensing regulations, 1984 provides for an appeal being preferred either under sub-regulation (4) or (5) of regulation 10 when a licence applied for is declined or for a revision or suo motn exercise of power. ..... it may be that the petitioner-association might have been formed by the erstwhile members of the second respondent-association either out of personal difference or out of their being disgruntled or deprivation of their dominance. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 15 2007 (HC)

Chennai Container Terminal Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Rep. by ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR2007Mad325; 2007(3)ARBLR510(Madras); 2007(4)CTC284

..... 169 of 2006 for setting aside the order dated 09.01.2007 contending inter alia that uoi cannot seek to set aside the award as it is not a party to either the arbitration agreement or the proceedings before the arbitral tribunal. ..... article 1 of the agreement defines the 'party' to mean either the licensor or the licensee as the context may require or admit and 'parties' mean both licensor and licensee'. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 01 2009 (HC)

Allied Blenders and Distillers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Intellectual Property App ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR2009Mad196

..... same is the provision in the rule 53 under the present trade marks rules, 2002, which permits the registrar to give leave to either of the parties to lead any evidence upon such terms as to costs or otherwise as he may think fit. 21. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 21 2006 (HC)

The General Secretary, Icf Labour Union/ir Vs. Government of India Rep ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [2006(111)FLR974]; (2006)IIILLJ673Mad; (2006)4MLJ16

..... irrigation karamchari sangh case : (1985)illj519sc , there may be exceptional cases in which the state government may, on a proper examination of the demand, come to a conclusion that the demands are either perverse or frivolous and do not merit a reference. ..... there may be exceptional cases in which the state government may, on a proper examination of the demand, come to a conclusion that the demands are either perverse or frivolous and do not merit a reference. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 19 2005 (HC)

N.S. Arumugam Vs. Trishul Traders

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [2006]132CompCas434(Mad); (2006)2MLJ41

..... unless and until the defendant either by direct evidence or by circumstantial evidence acceptable to the court proves that the negotiable instrument was not supported by consideration, the burden on the defendants is not shifted. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 11 2002 (HC)

Yokogawa Blue Star Ltd. Vs. Soffia Software Ltd. (Formerly Soffia Info ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [2004]119CompCas929(Mad); [2004]55SCL340(Mad)

..... either party may change the address to which notices are to be sent by notifying the other party in writing. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 05 2002 (HC)

In Re: V. Arunachalam

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2002)2MLJ407

..... under clause (c) of section 263, the court can revoke a grant where it has been obtained fraudulently and mala fide in either of the two ways, viz by making a directly false suggestion, or by surreptitious and clandestine conduct, in concealing from the court something material to the case which it should have known to be a false allegation9. ..... smt latika bala dassi already referred to that the court refusal to grant annulment in cases where there is no likelihood of proof being offered that the will admitted to probate was either not genuine or had not been validly executed.16. ..... the respondent is a professional land grabber and in no way related either to the applicants or to vasudevan or thilortha alias santha bai. ..... as i was going through the documents filed on either side what struck me was that the respondent's (petitioner in o.p. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 31 2002 (HC)

Tamil Nadu Brick and Tile Mfrs. Industrial Service Co-operative Societ ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [2003]129TAXMAN343(Mad)

..... section 80p(2)(c) provides that in the case of a co-operative society engaged in activities other than those specified in clause (a) or clause (b) (either independently of, or in addition to, all or any of the activities so specified), so much of its profits and gains attributable to such activities as does not exceed (i) where such co-operative society is a consumers co-operative society, forty thousand rupees; and (ii) in any ..... we heard the arguments of the learned counsel on either side and perused the materials on record.8. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 16 2012 (HC)

M.Shenbhaga Kani. Vs. the Commissioner, Corporation of Chennai, and or ...

Court : Chennai

..... it is submitted that inspite of legal notice, issued by petitioner, no steps have been taken either by respondent nos.5 & 6 to stop the tiffin centre, nor respondent nos.1 to 3 have initiated any action.8. .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //