Court : Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) Nos.8748/2010 and 511/2011 % 1. February 13, 2013 W.P.(C) No.8748/2010 MEENU THAKUR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Manav Kumar, Advocate. versus SOMERVILLE SCHOOL AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Varun Mudgal, proxy counsel for respondent Nos.1 and 2. Mr. Pankaj Batra, Advocate for respondent No.3.2. W.P.(C) No.511/2011 MR. S. SANKALP Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Manav Kumar, Advocate. versus SOMERVILLE SCHOOL AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Varun Mudgal, proxy counsel for respondent Nos.1 and 2. Ms. Anjana Gossain, Advocate for respondent No.3. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) W.P.(C) No.8748/2010 1. By this writ petition, the petitioner/teacher who worked as a Dance Teacher in the respondent No.1-school from 1.4.2003 till her resignation on 31.7.2007 seeks payment of the arrears of salary in terms of the report of the Sixth Pay Commission. I may...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.12132/2009 & conn. 14th February, 2013 % + W.P.(C) 12132/2009 T.P.SINGH ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Raj Kumar Sherawat, Advocate. versus GURU HARKRISHAN PUBLIC SCHOOL AND ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Raj Kamal and Mr. A.Faraz Khan, Adv. for R-1 & 2. Ms. Latika Dutta, Advocate for R-3. + W.P.(C) 8778/2011 G.S.VIRK AND ORS ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Raj Kumar Sherawat, Advocate versus SCHOOL MANAGEMENT OF GURU HARKRISHAN PUBLIC SCHOOL AND ORS ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Raj Kamal and Mr. A. Faraz Khan, Advocates for R-1. Mr. Shariq Mohd., Adv. for R-2. AND + W.P.(C) 8188/2011 ANITA RANI ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Raj Kumar Sherawat, Advocate. versus DELHI SIKH GURUDWARA MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Manpreet Kaur, Advocate for R-1,2 and 3. Mr. V.C.Jha and Ms. Sonia Sharma, Advocate for R-4. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? Yes VALMIKI J.MEH...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:26. 06.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN and THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI Writ Petition (MD) Nos.11350 of 2012 and Writ Petition (MD) Nos.3318 of 2013 1.K.V.Jeyaraj ... Petitioner in W.P(MD)No.11350 of 2012 2.I.Ismail ... Petitioner in W.P(MD)No.3318 of 2013 Vs. 1.The Chancellor of Universities, Raj Bhavan, Guindy, Chennai 600 022. 2.State of Tamil Nadu, Rep by the Principal Secretary, Department of Higher Education, Secretariat, Chennai 9. 3.University Grants Commission, Rep by its Chairman, Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi 110 002. 4.Kalyani Mathivanan, Vice Chancellor, Madurai Kamaraj University, Palkalai Nagar, Madurai 21. 5.Madurai Kamaraj University, Rep by the Registrar, Palkalai Nagar, Madurai 625 021. 6.S.S.Chandran Babu (R-6 impleaded as per order dated 17.02.2014 in M.P(MD)No.1 of 2013) 7.The Madurai Kamaraj University, Rep by the Registrar, Palkalai Nagar, Madurai 625 021. 8.Kalyani Mathiva...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.5789 OF2022(Arising out of S.L.P. (Civil) No.1118 of 2022) ST. MARYS EDUCATION SOCIETY & ANR. APPELLANTS VERSUS RAJENDRA PRASAD BHARGAVA & ORS. ......RESPONDENTS JUDGMENT J.B. PARDIWALA, J.:1. Leave granted.2. This appeal is at the instance of a private unaided minority educational institution and its disciplinary committee, (respondents before the High Court) and is directed against the judgment and order dated 15.12.2021 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Bench Indore in the Writ Appeal No.485 of 2017 by which the Division Bench set aside the judgment and order passed by a learned single 1 Judge of the High Court and held that a writ petition filed by an employee of a private unaided minority educational institution seeking to challenge his termination from service is maintainable in law.3. In the present appeal, two pivotal issues fall for consideration of this Court: (...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE15H DAY OF MARCH, 2022 PRESENT THE HONBLE MR. RITU RAJ AWASTHI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNA S. DIXIT AND THE HONBLE MS. JUSTICE J.M. KHAZI WRIT PETITION No.2347/2022 (GM-RES) C/w WRIT PETITION No.2146/2022 (GM-RES), WRIT PETITION No.2880/2022 (GM-RES), WRIT PETITION No.3038/2022 (GM-RES), WRIT PETITION No.3424/2022 (GM-RES-PIL), WRIT PETITION No.4309/2022 (GM-RES), WRIT PETITION No.4338/2022 (GM-RES-PIL) IN W.P. NO.2347 OF2022BETWEEN:1. . SMT RESHAM, D/O K FARUK, AGED ABOUT17YEARS, THROUGH NEXT FRIEND SRI MUBARAK, S/O F FARUK, AGED ABOUT21YEARS, BOTH RESIDING AT NO.9-138, PERAMPALI ROAD, SANTHEKATTE, SANTHOSH NAGARA, MANIPAL ROAD, KUNJIBETTU POST, UDUPI, KARNATAKA-576105. PETITIONER (BY PROF. RAVIVARMA KUMAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR SHRI ABHISHEK JANARDHAN, SHRI ARNAV. A. BAGALWADI & SHRI SHATHABISH SHIVANNA, ADVOCATES) 2 AND:1. . STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF PRIMAR...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE15H DAY OF MARCH, 2022 PRESENT THE HONBLE MR. RITU RAJ AWASTHI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNA S. DIXIT AND THE HONBLE MS. JUSTICE J.M. KHAZI WRIT PETITION No.2347/2022 (GM-RES) C/w WRIT PETITION No.2146/2022 (GM-RES), WRIT PETITION No.2880/2022 (GM-RES), WRIT PETITION No.3038/2022 (GM-RES), WRIT PETITION No.3424/2022 (GM-RES-PIL), WRIT PETITION No.4309/2022 (GM-RES), WRIT PETITION No.4338/2022 (GM-RES-PIL) IN W.P. NO.2347 OF2022BETWEEN:1. . SMT RESHAM, D/O K FARUK, AGED ABOUT17YEARS, THROUGH NEXT FRIEND SRI MUBARAK, S/O F FARUK, AGED ABOUT21YEARS, BOTH RESIDING AT NO.9-138, PERAMPALI ROAD, SANTHEKATTE, SANTHOSH NAGARA, MANIPAL ROAD, KUNJIBETTU POST, UDUPI, KARNATAKA-576105. PETITIONER (BY PROF. RAVIVARMA KUMAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR SHRI ABHISHEK JANARDHAN, SHRI ARNAV. A. BAGALWADI & SHRI SHATHABISH SHIVANNA, ADVOCATES) 2 AND:1. . STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF PRIMAR...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALAAT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN FRIDAY, THE30H DAY OF JANUARY201510TH MAGHA, 1936 WA.No. 1105 of 2013 () IN WP(C).28039/2011 -------------------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 28039/2011 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED1207-2013 APPELLANT/PETITIONER: ------------------------------------ B.JAYARAJAN S/O.BHARATHARAJAN, MANAGER, S.N.V.GIRLS HIGH SCHOOL PARAVOOR, KOLLAM-691301. BY ADV. SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS: ----------------------------------------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.2. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER KOLLAM DISTRICT-691001.3. SRI.J.S.SHALI SEWING TEACHER, S.N.V.GIRLS HIGH SCHOOL, PARAVOOR KOLLAM DISTRICT-691301.4. SMT.N.T.JISHA VISHAKAM, P.O.KOTTAPPURAM, PARAVOOR KOLLAM DISTRICT-691301. R1 & R2 BY SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.VIJ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.V.ASHA MONDAY, THE10H DAY OF AUGUST201519TH SRAVANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 4360 of 2013 (T) --------------------------- PETITIONER(S): -------------- 1. M.K.MOHANKUMAR, HIGH SCHOOL ASSISTANT CHAMAKAD VELAPPAN MUTHUVELAN HIGH SCHOOL, VANDAZHI PALAKKAD DISTRICT.2. D.SANTHOSH KUMAR UPPER PRIMARY SCHOOL ASSISTANT CHAMAKAD VELAPPAN MUTHUVELAN HIGH SCHOOL, VANDAZHI PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. DR.GEORGE ABRAHAM RESPONDENT(S): -------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.2. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-678 001.3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION PALAKKAD-678 001.4. THE DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER PALAKKAD-678 001.5. MANAGER CHAMAKAD VELAPPAN MUTHUVELAN HIGH SCHOOL, VANDAZHI PALAKKAD-678 706. R5 BY ADV. SRI.JACOB SEBASTIAN R BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI RAFEEK.V.K THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BE...
Tag this Judgment!Court : US Supreme Court
Bennett v. New Jersey - 470 U.S. 632 (1985) U.S. Supreme Court Bennett v. New Jersey, 470 U.S. 632 (1985) Bennett v. New Jersey No. 83-2064 Argued January 8, 1985 Decided March 19, 1985 470 U.S. 632 CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT Syllabus In earlier proceedings in this litigation, this Court, reversing the Court of Appeals' judgment, held that the Federal Government may recover misused funds from States that provided assurances that federal grants would be spent only on eligible programs under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, which provided for grants to support compensatory education for disadvantaged children in low-income areas. Bell v. New Jersey, 461 U. S. 773 . However, the Court expressly declined to address the issue whether substantive provisions of the 1978 Amendments to the Act apply retroactively for determining if Title I funds were misused in earlier years. On remand, New Jersey argued th...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Patna
J.N. Bhatt, C.J.1. By this Letters Patent. Appeal under Clause X of the Letters Patent, the appellant “Arajkiya Khwaja Shahid Hussain Primary Teacher Training College” (in short, the college) has assailed the judgment of the learned single Judge rendered in CWJC No. 5539 of 2004, passed on 16-3-2005., whereby the writ petition filed by the appellant-College for the direction for declaration of result of the examination of the students of the College for the Sessions, 1987-89, 1988-90 to 1992-94 came to be rejected on the grounds that; (1) the petition suffers from the delay, laches and negligence and acquiescence, (2) there was no explanation offered for a period since 1988 till 1997, as to why earlier legal redressal was not sought, (3) upon inquiry the College did not fulfil the requisite requirements even on the date of the inspection and, therefore, the affiliation was cancelled and revoked by the respondents-authorities from the date as it was granted temporary affili...
Tag this Judgment!