Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: dowry prohibition act 1961 section 3 penalty for giving or taking dowry Sorted by: recent Page 6 of about 2,160 results (0.171 seconds)

Dec 20 2023 (HC)

Sri Mallayya Koravanavar Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... sanctioning prosecution of the accused had not been produced as required under section 19(1). 23.3. sub-section (3), in our opinion, postulates a prohibition against a higher court reversing an order passed by the special judge on the ground of any defect, omission or irregularity in the order of sanction. it ..... 13/2014 the matter is under lokayukta police investigation. station 81. apart from the above, after conducting investigation under the provisions of the karnataka lokayukta act, 1984, certain reports have been submitted to the government for initiating disciplinary action against the erring public servants. in some cases, the government has entrusted ..... report from the comptroller and auditor general of india who had published a report with regard to several lapses in implementation of the scheme under the act in several districts including gadag district. gadag district was where the petitioner was one of those allegedly responsible for irregularities in preparation of bills and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 13 2023 (HC)

Mohammed Yaseen Naikwadi S/o Abdulla Naikwadi Vs. Smt Aneesa Mohammed ...

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... -section (1), the magistrate may also frame charges under section 498a of the indian penal code (45 of 1860) or any other provision of that code or the dowry prohibition act, 1961 (28 of 1961), as the case may be, if the facts disclose the commission of an offence under those provisions.14. in the present case, provisions of section 31 of the ..... on being prima facie satisfied that domestic violence has taken place or is likely to take place, pass a protection order in favour of the aggrieved person and prohibit the respondent from (a) committing any act of domestic violence; - 7 - nc:2023. khc-d:14623 crl.p no.102231 of 2023 (b) aiding or abetting in the commission of ..... d.v. act was pressed into service before the trial court essentially on ground that of arrears of the maintenance was not paid and therefore it paved for penal .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 11 2023 (HC)

Sri H Rajanna Vs. The Commissioner

Court : Karnataka

..... and acceded to by following due principles of law in an equitable manner in the interest of citizens.15. answer to point no.2: if there is no such prohibition in what manner those construction be put up?. 15.1. sri.vikram huilgol, learned additional advocate general has filed a detailed statement and on - 20 - nc ..... as commercial properties are concerned, the state would be required to consider and make it clear by issuance of appropriate guidelines to enable the concerned authorities to act in terms thereof even in respect of commercial premises. 15.3. insofar as the petitioners and/or the respondents in the present matters who have already put ..... of mandamus directing respondents no.1 to4by considering the representation of the petitioner dated2312.2019 vide annexure-k1 and k2 to take action under section462of karnataka municipal corporation act to demolish the illegal constructions built in door no.317, bearing no.3/a, ward no.195, old bank colony, konanakunte, bangalore-560062 and etc. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 11 2023 (HC)

Sri. Ravi S Vs. The Chief Commissioner

Court : Karnataka

..... and acceded to by following due principles of law in an equitable manner in the interest of citizens.15. answer to point no.2: if there is no such prohibition in what manner those construction be put up?. 15.1. sri.vikram huilgol, learned additional advocate general has filed a detailed statement and on - 20 - nc ..... as commercial properties are concerned, the state would be required to consider and make it clear by issuance of appropriate guidelines to enable the concerned authorities to act in terms thereof even in respect of commercial premises. 15.3. insofar as the petitioners and/or the respondents in the present matters who have already put ..... of mandamus directing respondents no.1 to4by considering the representation of the petitioner dated2312.2019 vide annexure-k1 and k2 to take action under section462of karnataka municipal corporation act to demolish the illegal constructions built in door no.317, bearing no.3/a, ward no.195, old bank colony, konanakunte, bangalore-560062 and etc. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 11 2023 (HC)

Mr K Vijaya Vs. The Chief Commissioner

Court : Karnataka

..... and acceded to by following due principles of law in an equitable manner in the interest of citizens.15. answer to point no.2: if there is no such prohibition in what manner those construction be put up?. 15.1. sri.vikram huilgol, learned additional advocate general has filed a detailed statement and on - 20 - nc ..... as commercial properties are concerned, the state would be required to consider and make it clear by issuance of appropriate guidelines to enable the concerned authorities to act in terms thereof even in respect of commercial premises. 15.3. insofar as the petitioners and/or the respondents in the present matters who have already put ..... of mandamus directing respondents no.1 to4by considering the representation of the petitioner dated2312.2019 vide annexure-k1 and k2 to take action under section462of karnataka municipal corporation act to demolish the illegal constructions built in door no.317, bearing no.3/a, ward no.195, old bank colony, konanakunte, bangalore-560062 and etc. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 11 2023 (HC)

Sri Nagaraj Vs. The Commissioner

Court : Karnataka

..... and acceded to by following due principles of law in an equitable manner in the interest of citizens.15. answer to point no.2: if there is no such prohibition in what manner those construction be put up?. 15.1. sri.vikram huilgol, learned additional advocate general has filed a detailed statement and on - 20 - nc ..... as commercial properties are concerned, the state would be required to consider and make it clear by issuance of appropriate guidelines to enable the concerned authorities to act in terms thereof even in respect of commercial premises. 15.3. insofar as the petitioners and/or the respondents in the present matters who have already put ..... of mandamus directing respondents no.1 to4by considering the representation of the petitioner dated2312.2019 vide annexure-k1 and k2 to take action under section462of karnataka municipal corporation act to demolish the illegal constructions built in door no.317, bearing no.3/a, ward no.195, old bank colony, konanakunte, bangalore-560062 and etc. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 11 2023 (HC)

Sri.k.c. Jagannatha Reddy Vs. The Commissioner

Court : Karnataka

..... and acceded to by following due principles of law in an equitable manner in the interest of citizens.15. answer to point no.2: if there is no such prohibition in what manner those construction be put up?. 15.1. sri.vikram huilgol, learned additional advocate general has filed a detailed statement and on - 20 - nc ..... as commercial properties are concerned, the state would be required to consider and make it clear by issuance of appropriate guidelines to enable the concerned authorities to act in terms thereof even in respect of commercial premises. 15.3. insofar as the petitioners and/or the respondents in the present matters who have already put ..... of mandamus directing respondents no.1 to4by considering the representation of the petitioner dated2312.2019 vide annexure-k1 and k2 to take action under section462of karnataka municipal corporation act to demolish the illegal constructions built in door no.317, bearing no.3/a, ward no.195, old bank colony, konanakunte, bangalore-560062 and etc. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 11 2023 (HC)

Kum. Kusuma Vs. The Commissioner

Court : Karnataka

..... and acceded to by following due principles of law in an equitable manner in the interest of citizens.15. answer to point no.2: if there is no such prohibition in what manner those construction be put up?. 15.1. sri.vikram huilgol, learned additional advocate general has filed a detailed statement and on - 20 - nc ..... as commercial properties are concerned, the state would be required to consider and make it clear by issuance of appropriate guidelines to enable the concerned authorities to act in terms thereof even in respect of commercial premises. 15.3. insofar as the petitioners and/or the respondents in the present matters who have already put ..... of mandamus directing respondents no.1 to4by considering the representation of the petitioner dated2312.2019 vide annexure-k1 and k2 to take action under section462of karnataka municipal corporation act to demolish the illegal constructions built in door no.317, bearing no.3/a, ward no.195, old bank colony, konanakunte, bangalore-560062 and etc. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 30 2023 (SC)

Mahalakshmi Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... police station halasurgate women, district bangalore city, karnataka for the offence punishable under sections 498a and 506 of the indian penal code, 18602 and sections 3 and 4 of the dowry prohibition act, 1961. after investigation, a charge sheet dated 20.07.2017 was filed. 1 for short fir 2 for short ipc 2 thereupon, the appellants, along with accused no.1 sarvan kumar .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 20 2023 (SC)

Dr. Balram Singh Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... amendments. in that ensuring full economic freedom and true emancipation were two enactments, the employment of manual scavengers and construction of dry latrines (prohibition) act, 1993 (hereinafter act 1993 ) and the prohibition of employment as manual scavengers and their rehabilitation act, 2013 (hereinafter act 2013 ).3. the present petition is filed under article 32 of the constitution of india, seeking directions to respondents (union of india ..... section 3, national commission karamcharis for safai karamcharis act, 1993; given statutory functions under section 31, 2013 act.2. state commission for safai section 32, 2013 act karamcharis 3. central monitoring committee section 29, prohibition act, 2013 4. state monitoring committee section 26, prohibition act, 2013 5. vigilance committees section 24, prohibition act, 2013 6. state level survey committee rule 11, prohibition rules, 2013 7. district level survey committee rule .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //