Court : International Court of Justice ICJ
..... as for the area in the north disputed by the parties as a relevant area, as explained above (see paragraph 101) the court has taken the view that the section of the ukrainian coast situated to the north of the line running from point s to cape tarkhankut is a relevant coast for the purpose of the delimitation exercise. ..... romania argues that the principles recognized by the parties in the 1997 additional agreement are applicable both to the diplomatic negotiations between the two states and for the purposes of any eventual settlement of the dispute by the court. ..... wording almost identical to that in the 1949 proc s-verbaux relating to the line beyond point 1439, set out at the end of paragraph 58 above, was included in a 1954 act, signed by authorized officers of the two countries, relating to the boundary mark no. ..... a major problem with the romanian thesis is the lack of any support in the 1948-1949 processes and the resulting agreement for a point to the east of serpents island. ..... le probl me majeur pos par la th se roumaine est que le processus de 1948-1949 et laccord auquel il a abouti ne vont pas dans le sens dun point situ lest de l le des serpents. ..... notes that the proc s-verbaux of 1949 resulted from the work of the joint soviet-romanian border commission implementing the protocol to specify the line of the state boundary between the peoples republic of romania and the union of soviet socialist republics, signed in moscow on 4 february 1948 (hereinafter the 1948 protocol?). .....
Tag this Judgment!