Deterrence - Judgment Search Results

Bachan Singh S/O Saudagar Singh Vs. State of Punjab

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: (1982)3SCC24; 19831SCR145;

..... possessing an extenuating impact has equally clearly highlighted that in india under present conditions deterrence through death penalty may not be a time barred punishment in some frightful areas ..... point worth stressing even if punishment by execution or imprisonment does not have any deterrent effect surely it must exert some incapacitative effect on punished offenders by reducing or .....

Furman Vs. Georgia

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the state s sole end in punishing our jurisprudence has always accepted deterrence in general deterrence of individual recidivism isolation of dangerous persons and rehabilitation as proper ..... therefore unconstitutional there are six purposes conceivably served by capital punishment retribution deterrence prevention of repetitive criminal acts encouragement of guilty pleas and confessions eugenics .....

Bachan Singh Vs. State of Punjab

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: (1982)3SCC24; [1983]1SCR145a

..... possessing an extenuating impact has equally clearly highlighted that in india under present conditions deterrence through death penalty may not be a time barred punishment in some frightful areas ..... point worth stressing even if punishment by execution or imprisonment does not have any deterrent effect surely it must exert some incapacitative effect on punished offenders by reducing or .....

United States Vs. Leon

Court: US Supreme Court

..... as a judicially created remedy designed to safeguard fourth amendment rights generally through its deterrent effect rather than a personal constitutional right of the party aggrieved united states v ..... circumstances the incentive system created by the exclusionary rule will have the hoped for deterrent effect but in situations where police officers reasonably but mistakenly believe that their planned .....

State Vs. Vikas Yadav and Anr.

Court: Delhi

..... or ignore the mitigating circumstances 53 the supreme court observed that principles of deterrence and retribution are the cornerstones of sentencing in 1994 2 scc220 dhananjoy chatterjee ..... account a combination of different factors while exercising discretion in sentencing that is proportionality deterrence rehabilitation etc see ramashraya chakravarti v state of madhya pradesh 1976 1 scc281 .....

Pennsylvania Bd. of Probation and Parole Vs. Scott

Court: US Supreme Court

..... because the rule is prudential rather than constitutionally mandated it applies only where its deterrence benefits outweigh the substantial social costs inherent in precluding consideration of reliable 358 ..... flexible administrative nature of parole revocation proceedings the rule would provide only minimal deterrence benefits in this context because application of the rule in the criminal trial .....

Friends of Earth, Inc. Vs. Laidlaw Environmental Services (Toc), Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... stated that the lesser penalty was appropriate taking into account the judgment s total deterrent effect in reaching this determination the court considered that laidlaw will be required to ..... particular plaintiffs indeed neither the district court s final opinion which contains the adequate deterrence statement nor its earlier opinion dealing with the preliminary question whether south carolina s .....

Vishal Yadav Vs. State Govt. of Up

Court: Delhi

..... or ignore the mitigating circumstances 53 the supreme court observed that principles of deterrence and retribution are the cornerstones of sentencing in 1994 2 scc220 dhananjoy chatterjee ..... account a combination of different factors while exercising discretion in sentencing that is proportionality deterrence rehabilitation etc see ramashraya chakravarti v state of madhya pradesh 1976 1 scc281 .....

Vikas Yadav Vs. State of Up

Court: Delhi

..... or ignore the mitigating circumstances 53 the supreme court observed that principles of deterrence and retribution are the cornerstones of sentencing in 1994 2 scc220 dhananjoy chatterjee ..... account a combination of different factors while exercising discretion in sentencing that is proportionality deterrence rehabilitation etc see ramashraya chakravarti v state of madhya pradesh 1976 1 scc281 .....

United States Vs. Janis

Court: US Supreme Court

..... rule is a judicially created remedy designed to safeguard fourth amendment rights generally through its deterrent effect rather than a personal constitutional right of the party aggrieved united states v ..... mentioned therein the comment discusses the design difficulties present and involved in studying the deterrent effect of the exclusionary rule in general although a proponent of the rule the .....