Court : Delhi
Decided on : May-01-2019
* + + + + + + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:07. 03.2019 Pronounced on:01. 05.2019 ST.APPL. 1/2017, C.M. Appl. No.3884-3885/2017 COMMISSIONER OF TRADE & TAXES, DELHI........ Petitioner SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC INDIA PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent versus ST.APPL. 5/2017, C.M. Appl. No.36948/2017, 36950/2017 COMMISSIONER OF TRADE & TAXES, DELHI ........ Petitioner SUPER AGENCIES ST.APPL. 6/2017 COMMISSIONER OF TRADE & TAXES DELHI ........ Petitioner M/S INGRAM MICRO INDIA LTD ..... Respondent ..... Respondent versus versus VAT APPEAL162016, C.M. Appl. No.29580/2016 M/S HANS RAJ OM PAKASH COMMISISONER TRADE & TAXES & ANR. versus ..... Appellant ..... Respondent VAT APPEAL172016 LARSEN & TOUBRO LTD. COMMISSIONER OF TRADE & TAXES versus ..... Appellant ..... Respondent versus VAT APPEAL182016 LARSEN & TOUBRO LTD. COMMISSIONER OF TRADE & TAXES VAT APPEAL192016, C.M. Appl. No.31746/2016 GE INDIA INDUSTRIAL PVT LTD COMMISSIONER OF TRADE AND TAXES DELHI..... Respondent ..... Resp...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Feb-28-2019
$~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:28. h February, 2019 + CS (COMM) 321/2018 SYMPHONY LTD. ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Raghav Sabharwal, Advocate. (M:9818844415) versus THERMO KING INDIA PVT LTD ..... Defendant Through: None. CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) 1. Symphony Ltd. (hereinafter, Plaintiff) has filed the present suit for permanent injunction restraining infringement of its registered designs and for damages. The Plaintiff is a company, which is engaged in the business of manufacturing and selling of consumer home appliances including air coolers. The design for the model Symphony Storm 70i was registered on 14th March, 2011 under Classification 23-04 (Air Cooler) bearing Design Registration No.235189.2. Copies of the the representation sheets and registration certificates for each of the models have been filed on record and have been exhibited as Ex. PW-1/8. The design is registered under the Designs Act, 2000 and is val...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Feb-18-2019
* % + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:18. h February, 2019. CS(COMM) 903/2018 & IA165862018 (u/O XXXIX R-4 CPC) CROCS INC. USA ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Akhil Sibal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. S.K. Bansal, Mr. Ajay Amitabh Suman, Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Mr. Kapil Giri, Mr. Vinay Kumar Shukla, Mohd. Sazeed Rayeen and Mr. Somnath Dey, Advs. Versus AQUALITE INDIA LIMITED AND ANR ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Peeyosh Kalra, Mr. C.A. Brijesh, Mr. Rohan Seth and Mr. Dhruv Grover, Advs. AND CS(COMM) 905/2016 & IA86062016 (u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC) CROCS INC USA ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Akhil Sibal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. S.K. Bansal, Mr. Ajay Amitabh Suman, Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Mr. Kapil Giri, Mr. Vinay Kumar Shukla, Mohd. Sazeed Rayeen and Mr. Somnath Dey, Advs. Versus ACTION SHOES PVT LTD & ANR ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Kapil Wadhwa, Ms. Deepika Pokharia, Ms. Devyani Nath & Ms. Kaveri Jain, Advs. AND CS(COMM) Nos.903/2018, 905/2016, 906/2016, 1415/2016, 569/2017 & 571/2017 Page 1 ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Feb-18-2019
* % + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:18. h February, 2019. CS(COMM) 903/2018 & IA165862018 (u/O XXXIX R-4 CPC) CROCS INC. USA ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Akhil Sibal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. S.K. Bansal, Mr. Ajay Amitabh Suman, Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Mr. Kapil Giri, Mr. Vinay Kumar Shukla, Mohd. Sazeed Rayeen and Mr. Somnath Dey, Advs. Versus AQUALITE INDIA LIMITED AND ANR ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Peeyosh Kalra, Mr. C.A. Brijesh, Mr. Rohan Seth and Mr. Dhruv Grover, Advs. AND CS(COMM) 905/2016 & IA86062016 (u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC) CROCS INC USA ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Akhil Sibal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. S.K. Bansal, Mr. Ajay Amitabh Suman, Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Mr. Kapil Giri, Mr. Vinay Kumar Shukla, Mohd. Sazeed Rayeen and Mr. Somnath Dey, Advs. Versus ACTION SHOES PVT LTD & ANR ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Kapil Wadhwa, Ms. Deepika Pokharia, Ms. Devyani Nath & Ms. Kaveri Jain, Advs. AND CS(COMM) Nos.903/2018, 905/2016, 906/2016, 1415/2016, 569/2017 & 571/2017 Page 1 ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Feb-18-2019
* % + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:18. h February, 2019. CS(COMM) 903/2018 & IA165862018 (u/O XXXIX R-4 CPC) CROCS INC. USA ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Akhil Sibal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. S.K. Bansal, Mr. Ajay Amitabh Suman, Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Mr. Kapil Giri, Mr. Vinay Kumar Shukla, Mohd. Sazeed Rayeen and Mr. Somnath Dey, Advs. Versus AQUALITE INDIA LIMITED AND ANR ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Peeyosh Kalra, Mr. C.A. Brijesh, Mr. Rohan Seth and Mr. Dhruv Grover, Advs. AND CS(COMM) 905/2016 & IA86062016 (u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC) CROCS INC USA ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Akhil Sibal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. S.K. Bansal, Mr. Ajay Amitabh Suman, Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Mr. Kapil Giri, Mr. Vinay Kumar Shukla, Mohd. Sazeed Rayeen and Mr. Somnath Dey, Advs. Versus ACTION SHOES PVT LTD & ANR ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Kapil Wadhwa, Ms. Deepika Pokharia, Ms. Devyani Nath & Ms. Kaveri Jain, Advs. AND CS(COMM) Nos.903/2018, 905/2016, 906/2016, 1415/2016, 569/2017 & 571/2017 Page 1 ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Feb-18-2019
* % + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:18. h February, 2019. CS(COMM) 903/2018 & IA165862018 (u/O XXXIX R-4 CPC) CROCS INC. USA ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Akhil Sibal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. S.K. Bansal, Mr. Ajay Amitabh Suman, Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Mr. Kapil Giri, Mr. Vinay Kumar Shukla, Mohd. Sazeed Rayeen and Mr. Somnath Dey, Advs. Versus AQUALITE INDIA LIMITED AND ANR ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Peeyosh Kalra, Mr. C.A. Brijesh, Mr. Rohan Seth and Mr. Dhruv Grover, Advs. AND CS(COMM) 905/2016 & IA86062016 (u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC) CROCS INC USA ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Akhil Sibal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. S.K. Bansal, Mr. Ajay Amitabh Suman, Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Mr. Kapil Giri, Mr. Vinay Kumar Shukla, Mohd. Sazeed Rayeen and Mr. Somnath Dey, Advs. Versus ACTION SHOES PVT LTD & ANR ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Kapil Wadhwa, Ms. Deepika Pokharia, Ms. Devyani Nath & Ms. Kaveri Jain, Advs. AND CS(COMM) Nos.903/2018, 905/2016, 906/2016, 1415/2016, 569/2017 & 571/2017 Page 1 ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Feb-18-2019
* % + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:18. h February, 2019. CS(COMM) 903/2018 & IA165862018 (u/O XXXIX R-4 CPC) CROCS INC. USA ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Akhil Sibal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. S.K. Bansal, Mr. Ajay Amitabh Suman, Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Mr. Kapil Giri, Mr. Vinay Kumar Shukla, Mohd. Sazeed Rayeen and Mr. Somnath Dey, Advs. Versus AQUALITE INDIA LIMITED AND ANR ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Peeyosh Kalra, Mr. C.A. Brijesh, Mr. Rohan Seth and Mr. Dhruv Grover, Advs. AND CS(COMM) 905/2016 & IA86062016 (u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC) CROCS INC USA ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Akhil Sibal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. S.K. Bansal, Mr. Ajay Amitabh Suman, Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Mr. Kapil Giri, Mr. Vinay Kumar Shukla, Mohd. Sazeed Rayeen and Mr. Somnath Dey, Advs. Versus ACTION SHOES PVT LTD & ANR ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Kapil Wadhwa, Ms. Deepika Pokharia, Ms. Devyani Nath & Ms. Kaveri Jain, Advs. AND CS(COMM) Nos.903/2018, 905/2016, 906/2016, 1415/2016, 569/2017 & 571/2017 Page 1 ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Feb-18-2019
* % + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:18. h February, 2019. CS(COMM) 903/2018 & IA165862018 (u/O XXXIX R-4 CPC) CROCS INC. USA ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Akhil Sibal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. S.K. Bansal, Mr. Ajay Amitabh Suman, Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Mr. Kapil Giri, Mr. Vinay Kumar Shukla, Mohd. Sazeed Rayeen and Mr. Somnath Dey, Advs. Versus AQUALITE INDIA LIMITED AND ANR ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Peeyosh Kalra, Mr. C.A. Brijesh, Mr. Rohan Seth and Mr. Dhruv Grover, Advs. AND CS(COMM) 905/2016 & IA86062016 (u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC) CROCS INC USA ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Akhil Sibal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. S.K. Bansal, Mr. Ajay Amitabh Suman, Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Mr. Kapil Giri, Mr. Vinay Kumar Shukla, Mohd. Sazeed Rayeen and Mr. Somnath Dey, Advs. Versus ACTION SHOES PVT LTD & ANR ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Kapil Wadhwa, Ms. Deepika Pokharia, Ms. Devyani Nath & Ms. Kaveri Jain, Advs. AND CS(COMM) Nos.903/2018, 905/2016, 906/2016, 1415/2016, 569/2017 & 571/2017 Page 1 ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Jul-26-2019
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE26h DAY OF JULY, 2019 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE P.B. BAJANTHRI WRIT PETITION NO.31490 OF2016(S-RES)BETWEEN : SRI.B.S.DALAYATH AGED ABOUT48YEARS S/O.LATE SUBANSAHEB ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER NO.1, WATER SUPPLY AND SANITARY SUB DIVISION (NORTH) 17-18TH CROSS, MALLESHWARAM BANGALORE-560 003 PETITIONER (BY SRI.RAJGOPAL, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI.NISHANTH A.V. (NOC), ADV.) AND:1. BANGALORE WATER SUPPLY & SEWERAGE BOARD, 1ST FLOOR, CAUVERY BHAVAN, K.G.ROAD, BANGALORE-560 009 BY IT CHAIRMAN STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT VIKAS SOUDHA BANGALORE-560 001 T.R.SRINIVASA S/O.LATE T.RAMAPPA AGED ABOUT52YEARS WORKING AS EXECUTIVE ENGINEER S.T.P (V & H) DIVISION BANGALORE WATER SUPPLY AND SEWERAGE BOARD NAYANDANDAHALLI2 3. 2 BANGALORE-560 039... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.B.L.SANJEEV, ADV. FOR R1 & R2 SRI.M.S.BHAGWAT, ADV. FOR R3 & R4) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAY...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Aug-28-2019
* % + W.P.(C) 3451/2015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:05. 04.2019 Judgment delivered on:28. 08.2019 NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ANR. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. R.V. Sinha, Mr. A.S. Singh & Mr. Amit Sinha, Advocates. versus RAJESH SHARMA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Anil Grover and Mr. Mishal Vij, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. CHAWLA JUDGMENT VIPIN SANGHI, J.1. The instant writ petition preferred by North Delhi Municipal Corporation in short 'NrDMC', and, its Commissioner, assailing the judgment dated 07.08.2014 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, in short 'CAT', in O.A. No.4466/2011 raises an important question of law as to who is the competent authority to take disciplinary action(s) and impose penalty(ies) on the municipal officers and other W.P.(C.) No.3451/2015 Page 1 of 71 municipal employees under The Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 in short 'the Act', pos...
Tag this Judgment!