1
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Dec-15-2017
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.243 OF2005RAJIVE RATURI .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS .....RESPONDENT(S) W I T H WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.228 OF2006JUDGMENT A.K. SIKRI, J.The petitioner herein, who is a visually disabled person, is resident of Gurgaon (now Gurugram) and works in Delhi with a human rights organisation. He has filed this petition in public interest on behalf of the disabled persons (though better expression to describe these persons is differently-abled persons) for proper and adequate access to public places. In particular, this petition seeks providing all accessibility requirements to meet the needs of visually disabled persons in respect of safe access to roads and transport facilities. It is stated in the petition that there are sixty to seventy million disabled persons in India and 2 almost 50% thereof suffer from visual disability. The fundamental concern of these visually impair...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Aug-18-2017
1/97 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU DATED THIS THE18H DAY OF AUGUST, 2017 BEFORE THE HON'BLE Dr.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI W.P.No.27575/2017, W.P.No.28172/2017 C/W W.P.No.27988/2017, W.P.No.29609/2017, W.P.No.31513/2017, W.P.No.31515/2017, W.P.No.31517/2017, W.P.No.31518/2017, W.P.No.25895/2017 AND W.P.No.26805/2017 (EXCISE) W.P.No.27575/2017: Between: M/s. High Point Hotels Pvt. Ltd., No.42, 4th Cross, Industrial Layout 5th Block, Koramangala Bengaluru-560 001. By Managing Director Kanchan Lulla W/o Late Harish Lulla Aged about 61 years. (By Mr. K.P. Kumar, Senior Counsel for Mr. G.K. Bhat, Advocate) And:1. The Excise Commissioner in Karnataka 2nd Floor, TTMC, A Block BMTC Building, Shantinagar Bengaluru-560 027. Petitioner Date of Judgment:18. 08-2017 W.P.No.27575/2017 & connected matters M/s. High Point Hotels Pvt. Ltd., and others Vs. The Excise Commissioner in Karnataka and others 2/97 The Deputy Commissioner Bangalore Urban District Bengaluru-560001.2.3. The Deputy Comm...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Mar-24-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction Original Side A.P.No.1038 of 2016 Saraf Agencies PVT.LTD.& Anr. versus Federal Agencies For State Property Management & Anr. For the petitioners:- Mr.Jishnu Saha..Sr.Adv Mr.Ishan Saha Ms.Riti Basu Advocates For the Respondents:- Mr.Ratnanko Banerjee, Sr.Adv.MRS.Ritu Valla Mr.M.Manukrishnan Ms.Prapa Ganguly Advocates Judgement On: - 24th March, 2017 I.P.MUKERJI, J. In this application, under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, an interim arbitral award made on 14th October, 2016 is challenged. It was made and published by a panel of three very distinguished Judges of our country, Justice S.C.Agrawal, Justice D.P.Wadhwa and Justice S.B.Sinha. The claimants /petitioners were directed to pay a sum of Rs.135,16,92,947.73 to the account of TPPL within one month from the date of the award, failing which they would have to pay interest @ 24% p.a.from the date of the interim award till the date of payment. ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Aug-30-2017
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON:20. 07.2017 PRONOUNCED ON:30. 08.2017 % + W.P.(C) 1103/2016 MAHENDRA ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioners ........ Petitioners ........ Petitioners ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) 1104/2016 DHARMVEER AND ORS W.P.(C) 1112/2016 HARICHAND AND ORS W.P.(C) 1114/2016 CHANDERMAL AND ORS W.P.(C) 7126/2016 VINOD KUMAR & ORS versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Through: Mr. Hara Prasad Sahu, Advocate with Mr. Shiv Kant Mishra & Mr. Kamlesh K. Mishra, Advocates for the petitioners. Mr.Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms.Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate for L&B/LAC in W.P.(C)1103, 1114 & 7126/2016. Mr. Sharan Thakur & Ms. Natasha Thakur, Advocates for DDA in W.P.(C) 1103, 1104, 1112 & 1114/2016. Mr. Mukesh Sachdeva, Advocate for UOI in W.P.(C) 7126/2016. Ms. Astha Tyagi, Advocate for L&B/LAC in W.P.(C)1104/2016. Ms. Ruchika Rathi, Advocate for L&B/LAC in W.P.(C)1112/2016. W.P.(C)1103/2016 with connected matters Page 1 of 14 CORAM: HON'BL...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Aug-30-2017
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON:20. 07.2017 PRONOUNCED ON:30. 08.2017 % + W.P.(C) 1103/2016 MAHENDRA ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioners ........ Petitioners ........ Petitioners ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) 1104/2016 DHARMVEER AND ORS W.P.(C) 1112/2016 HARICHAND AND ORS W.P.(C) 1114/2016 CHANDERMAL AND ORS W.P.(C) 7126/2016 VINOD KUMAR & ORS versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Through: Mr. Hara Prasad Sahu, Advocate with Mr. Shiv Kant Mishra & Mr. Kamlesh K. Mishra, Advocates for the petitioners. Mr.Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms.Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate for L&B/LAC in W.P.(C)1103, 1114 & 7126/2016. Mr. Sharan Thakur & Ms. Natasha Thakur, Advocates for DDA in W.P.(C) 1103, 1104, 1112 & 1114/2016. Mr. Mukesh Sachdeva, Advocate for UOI in W.P.(C) 7126/2016. Ms. Astha Tyagi, Advocate for L&B/LAC in W.P.(C)1104/2016. Ms. Ruchika Rathi, Advocate for L&B/LAC in W.P.(C)1112/2016. W.P.(C)1103/2016 with connected matters Page 1 of 14 CORAM: HON'BL...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Aug-30-2017
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON:20. 07.2017 PRONOUNCED ON:30. 08.2017 % + W.P.(C) 1103/2016 MAHENDRA ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioners ........ Petitioners ........ Petitioners ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) 1104/2016 DHARMVEER AND ORS W.P.(C) 1112/2016 HARICHAND AND ORS W.P.(C) 1114/2016 CHANDERMAL AND ORS W.P.(C) 7126/2016 VINOD KUMAR & ORS versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Through: Mr. Hara Prasad Sahu, Advocate with Mr. Shiv Kant Mishra & Mr. Kamlesh K. Mishra, Advocates for the petitioners. Mr.Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms.Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate for L&B/LAC in W.P.(C)1103, 1114 & 7126/2016. Mr. Sharan Thakur & Ms. Natasha Thakur, Advocates for DDA in W.P.(C) 1103, 1104, 1112 & 1114/2016. Mr. Mukesh Sachdeva, Advocate for UOI in W.P.(C) 7126/2016. Ms. Astha Tyagi, Advocate for L&B/LAC in W.P.(C)1104/2016. Ms. Ruchika Rathi, Advocate for L&B/LAC in W.P.(C)1112/2016. W.P.(C)1103/2016 with connected matters Page 1 of 14 CORAM: HON'BL...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Aug-30-2017
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON:20. 07.2017 PRONOUNCED ON:30. 08.2017 % + W.P.(C) 1103/2016 MAHENDRA ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioners ........ Petitioners ........ Petitioners ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) 1104/2016 DHARMVEER AND ORS W.P.(C) 1112/2016 HARICHAND AND ORS W.P.(C) 1114/2016 CHANDERMAL AND ORS W.P.(C) 7126/2016 VINOD KUMAR & ORS versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Through: Mr. Hara Prasad Sahu, Advocate with Mr. Shiv Kant Mishra & Mr. Kamlesh K. Mishra, Advocates for the petitioners. Mr.Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms.Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate for L&B/LAC in W.P.(C)1103, 1114 & 7126/2016. Mr. Sharan Thakur & Ms. Natasha Thakur, Advocates for DDA in W.P.(C) 1103, 1104, 1112 & 1114/2016. Mr. Mukesh Sachdeva, Advocate for UOI in W.P.(C) 7126/2016. Ms. Astha Tyagi, Advocate for L&B/LAC in W.P.(C)1104/2016. Ms. Ruchika Rathi, Advocate for L&B/LAC in W.P.(C)1112/2016. W.P.(C)1103/2016 with connected matters Page 1 of 14 CORAM: HON'BL...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Aug-30-2017
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON:20. 07.2017 PRONOUNCED ON:30. 08.2017 % + W.P.(C) 1103/2016 MAHENDRA ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioners ........ Petitioners ........ Petitioners ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) 1104/2016 DHARMVEER AND ORS W.P.(C) 1112/2016 HARICHAND AND ORS W.P.(C) 1114/2016 CHANDERMAL AND ORS W.P.(C) 7126/2016 VINOD KUMAR & ORS versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Through: Mr. Hara Prasad Sahu, Advocate with Mr. Shiv Kant Mishra & Mr. Kamlesh K. Mishra, Advocates for the petitioners. Mr.Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms.Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate for L&B/LAC in W.P.(C)1103, 1114 & 7126/2016. Mr. Sharan Thakur & Ms. Natasha Thakur, Advocates for DDA in W.P.(C) 1103, 1104, 1112 & 1114/2016. Mr. Mukesh Sachdeva, Advocate for UOI in W.P.(C) 7126/2016. Ms. Astha Tyagi, Advocate for L&B/LAC in W.P.(C)1104/2016. Ms. Ruchika Rathi, Advocate for L&B/LAC in W.P.(C)1112/2016. W.P.(C)1103/2016 with connected matters Page 1 of 14 CORAM: HON'BL...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Aug-21-2017
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Reportable CRIMINAL/CIVIL APPELLATE/ORIGINAL JURISIDCTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.67 OF2011Securities and Exchange Board of India Appellant(s) Classic Credit Ltd. versus With Respondent(s) Criminal Appeal Nos. 68 to 73 of 2011 Civil Appeal Nos. 102-103 of 2011 Criminal Appeal No.1096 of 2013 Writ Petition (Crl.) No.67 of 2016 Criminal Appeal No.1450 of 2017 (Arising out of SLP(Crl.) No.3593 of 2011) Civil Appeal No.10729 of 2017 Arising out of SLP(C) No.21394 of 2011 JUDGMENT Jagdish Singh Khehar, CJI.1.2. Leave granted, in all the special leave petitions. Complaints were filed against the private parties herein, for offences punishable under the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 (hereinafter referred to as the SEBI Act). At the time when the complaints were filed under Section 26(2) of the SEBI Act, the concerned accused were to be tried by a Metropolitan Magistrate (or, a 1 Judicial Magistrate of the first class). In this bunch of cases, the ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Jan-19-2017
(Prayer: This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, praying to quash the complaint dated 31.10.2013 lodged by the third respondent (Annexure-A) and the FIR dated 1.11.2013 in Crime No.370/2013 (Annexure-B) before the Mandya West Police, Mandya and the FIR dated 23.12.2014 in Crime No.RC.21(A)/2014 registered by the CBI,ACB, Bangalore (Annexure-C) and the charge sheet bearing No.30/CBI/ACB/BLR/2015 dated 31.12.2015 filed by the CBI, ACM, Bangalore, the second respondent herein (Annexure-D) and proceedings in R.C.No.21(A) /2014/CBI/ACB/BLR pending on the file of the Court of the XLVI Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, and Principal Special Judge for CBI Cases at Bangalore (CCH-47) (Annexure-e).) 1. The facts leading up to this petition are stated to be as follows. The petitioner was said to be working as the Assistant Director of Town and Country Planning, as on the date of the petition. Before that he had served in various capacities, from...
Tag this Judgment!