Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: deposit insurance and credit guarantee corporation act 1961 section 31 reserve fund Sorted by: old Court: rajasthan Page 1 of about 60 results (0.142 seconds)

Jul 22 1965 (HC)

S. Ghosh and ors. Vs. Dulia and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1967Raj145; (1969)ILLJ194Raj

..... insurance policy to the life insurance corporation of india established under the life insurance corporation act, 1956, or for the purchase of securities of the government of india or of any state government or for being deposited in any post office savings bank in furtherance of any savings scheme of ..... this behalf by the state government during the continuance of such approval: (j) deductions for payments to co-operative societies approved by the state government or to a scheme of insurance, maintained by the indian post office; and (k) deductions, made with the written authorization of the person employed for payment of any premium on his life .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 11 1968 (HC)

Rajasthan State Electricity Board, Jaipur Vs. Hindustan Brown Boveri L ...

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1969Raj212; 1968()WLN83

ORDERKan Singh, J. 1. This is a revision application by the Rajasthan Stale Electricity Board, hereinafter to be referred as the 'Board', and is directed against an order dated 28-8-68 passed by the Additional District Judge, Jaipur on an application by the respondent Messrs. Hindustan Brown Boveri Limited, hereinafter to be referred as the 'Company' for grant of a temporary injunction in certain proceedings instituted by the Company against the petitioner Board under Section 20 of the Indian Arbitration Act. By his order under challenge the learned Additional District Judge directed the petitioner Board 'to refrain itself from making purchases of the material of the specifications for which order was placed with the Company bv the Board to the extent of 9000 kilometers of All Aluminium Conductors till the matter was disposed of through arbitration.' The relevant facts are briefly these: 2. According to the Company, the Board had invited tenders sometime in the early part of 1965 for t...

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 31 1970 (HC)

Ram Chandra Vs. Sukh Deo and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1970WLN165

..... the parties has placed on the record nor has alleged that there were any rules framed by the former jodhpur railway co-operative credit society ltd., jodhpur from which the amount of rs. 5154/8/- lying in deposit to the credit of sheodeo was withdrawn by smt. lal kanwar. in absence of rules on the subject the nature of transaction has to be ..... counsel for the parties, it may be stated here are either under the provident funds act, 1925 or under the insurance act, 1938 which contain special provisions in this respect. of course the law on the subject of provident funds and insurance and for the matter of that contributions to other societies must in the ultimate analysis rest upon the terms of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 03 1979 (HC)

Deva Ram Vs. State and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1979WLN1

..... has acted malafide, ilk gaily and in utter disregard of the rajasthan minor mineral concession rules, 1959 ('the rules' hereafter) it was therefore, prayed that allotment, renewal, depositing of rent-cum-royalty and all proceedings in respect of quarry no. 377 situate in kali ben area jodhpur in favour of defendant no. 3 may be declared illegal, ..... the plaintiff that without deciding his objections if the allotment has been made to defendant no. 3 or it has been renewed or rent-cum-royalty has been deposited or any other proceeding has been taken by defendant no. 3, they are all without jurisdiction and are acts of favoritism to him. in paras 14 to ..... time of the transfer of shri gupta, mining engineer, jodhpur because of favourtism without any proposed allotment, rent cum royalty in respect of quarry no. 377 was got deposited illegally and without jurisdiction in paras 3, 4, 5 and 6 of the plaint, allegations against shri mahaveer prasad. clerk of the mining department, jodhpur have been .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 06 1982 (HC)

H.S. Chauhan and ors. Vs. Life Insurance Corporation of India and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1982WLN321

..... regardless of their antecedent contracts of employment of industrial settlements or awards. it was elementary that the corporation could not perpetuate incongruous features of service of parent insurers, and statutory power had to be vested to vary, modify or suspersede these contracts, geared to fair, equitable and, as far as possible, uniform ..... the working of the agents according to the rules, etc. carrying out of the instructions given by the superiors, submitting tour reports with relevant statements, depositing or remitting of the money collected by the agents, giving full details to the bank, issue of the receipts in case the amounts are directly ..... (2), the following sub-section shall be inserted namely:(2a) the regulations and other provisions as in force immediately before the commencement of the life insurance corporation (amendment) act, 1981, with respect to the terms and conditions of service of employees and agents of the corporation including those who became employees .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 19 1984 (HC)

Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation and anr. Vs. Smt. Pista Aga ...

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1985(1)WLN415

..... persons intervening sometimes between the victims of the accidents or their legal representatives and the payment machinery.83. their lordships of the gujarat high court in muljibhai v. united india insurance co. ltd. : air1984guj7 confronted with the serious difficulties and realities of this situation, brother a.m. ahemdi, j. speaking for himself and r.c. mankad, j. ..... money.(i) the claims tribunal should, in the case of minors, invariably order the amount of compensation awarded to the minor be invested in long term fixed deposits at least till the date of the minor attaining majority. the expenses incurred by the guardian or next friend may however be allowed to be withdrawn;(ii) in ..... in case of an emergency. to meet with such a contingency, if the amount awarded is substantial, the claims tribunal may invest it more than one fixed deposit so that if need be one such fdr can be liquidated;these guidelines are not exhaustive but are merely illustrative. a copy of this order may be sent .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 19 1984 (HC)

Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation Vs. Pista Aggarwal and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1(1985)ACC466

..... persons intervening sometimes between the victims of the accidents or their legal representatives and the payment machinery.83. their lordships of the gujarat high court in muljibhai v. united india insurance co. ltd. : air1984guj7 confronted with the serious difficulties and realities of this situation, brother a.m. ahamdi j., speaking for himself and r.c. mankal j., ..... money.(i) the claims tribunal should, in the case of minors, invariably order the amount of compensation awarded to the minor be invested in long term fixed deposits at least till the date of the minor attaining majority. the expenses incurred by the guardian or next friend may however be allowed to be withdrawn;(ii) in ..... case of an emergency. to meet with such a contingency, if the amount awarded is substantial, the claims tribunal may invest it in more then one fixed deposit so that if need be one such f.d.r. can be liquidated:these guidelines are not exhaustive but are merely illustrative. a copy of this order may .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 20 1985 (HC)

Murari Lal Vs. Gomati Devi and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 2(1985)ACC158

..... was against them. cross-objections are filed in both the appeals. it is true that the claimants have not taken specific contentions regarding the liability of the insurance company in their cross-objections but it would be an additional ground which can certainly be permitted as a pura question of law as emerging from the aforesaid ..... act of appellant no. 1 and, therefore, responsible for payment of the compensation to the original claimants as awarded by the tribunal. consequently, respondent no. 2, being insurance company, would not be liable to pay the said amount. in that view of the matter, therefore, the order of the tribunal requires to be modified.in the ..... respondent to claim it as matter or right, he having elected to be satisfied the decree passed by the trial court.mr. munshi has cited the case of big insurance co. v. ramnath : air1962mp368 in which it has been held as under:the principle generally applicable is that a decree binds the parties unless, in appropriate proceedings .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 11 1986 (HC)

Darshani Devi and ors. Vs. Sheo Ram and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : [1989]65CompCas353(Raj); 1987(1)WLN332

..... claimants would get interest at the rate of 12% from the date of application till the date of realisation and from the date the amounts have been deposited by the insurance company or owners of the vehicles, the interest would cease on that amount only. so far as this court is concerned, the parties would bear their ..... to the contrary contained in general exception no. 4 but subject otherwise to the terms, exceptions, conditions and limitations of this policy, the company will indemnify the insured against liability at law for compensation (including law costs of any claimant) for death of, or bodily injury to, any person other than a person excluded under ..... india assurance company for the death of munish kumar, because it is only when munish kumar is required to pay compensation, that the question of indemnifying by the insurance company can arise.39. however, so far as other passengers are concerned, namely, sulochana, anjana, nawal kishore and gopi ram, they would certainly be entitled to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 03 1991 (HC)

Oriental Fire and Genl. Ins. Co. Ltd. Vs. Shanta Kanwar and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1992ACJ903

..... a blank the liability of the appellant did not extend beyond the statutory limit.5. in reply, the learned counsel for the respondents contended that the appellant insurance company is liable to pay the entire amount of compensation awarded. it was further contended by the learned counsel for the claimant-respondents that the amount awarded ..... to the contrary contained in section ii-i (c) but subject otherwise to the terms, exceptions, conditions and limitations of this policy the company will indemnify the insured against liability at law for compensation (including law costs of any claimant) for death of or bodily injury to any person than a person excluded under ii-i ..... are also applicable to a claim or series of claims under this endorsement.provided further in the event of the policy being cancelled at the request of the insured no refund of premium paid in respect of this endorsement will be allowed. subject otherwise to the terms, exceptions, conditions and limitations of this policy.the .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //