Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: delimitation amendment act 2003 section 4 amendment of section 8 Sorted by: old Court: kerala Page 2 of about 6,932 results (0.210 seconds)

Mar 08 2004 (HC)

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. A.M. Habeeb

Court : Kerala

Reported in : (2004)188CTR(Ker)100; [2004]268ITR344(Ker); 2004(2)KLT202

..... of the it department is that the provisions of section 52a and schedule ii article 3 item (iii)(c) inserted by the kerala court fees and suits valuation (amendment) act, 2003 w.e.f. 26th oct., 2002, cannot be applied to appeals filed before the high court in respect of the proceedings commenced prior to such insertion. in ..... by the ordinance in the first instance w.e.f. 26th oct., 2002 and later replaced by the amendment act, 2003 on 6th march, 2003.21. section 52a of the court fees act as inserted by the court fees and suits valuation (amendment) act, 2003 has already been extracted in para 11 supra. the said provision has not been specifically made retrospective. however, ..... the state has filed a statement. it is stated therein that section 52a inserted in the kerala court fees and suits valuation act, 1959 by the kerala court fees and suits valuation (amendment) act, 2003 (act 2 of 2003) applies to all appeals covered by the said section w.e.f. 26th oct., 2002. it is also stated that the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 17 2005 (HC)

Chandra Naik Vs. Paivalikke Grama Panchayat

Court : Kerala

Reported in : 2005(2)KLT843

..... the president of the panchayat which is reserved to the scheduled tribe community. he ceased to belong to scheduled tribe as per the notification dated 8.1.2003 of the scheduled castes & scheduled tribes orders (amendment) act, 2002. the 'maratti' community to which the writ petitioner belonged was removed from the list of scheduled tribes. he was an elected member of the panchayat ..... xeroxed the constitutional provision is that the reservation of the presidentship of the panchayat and with respect to the number of the constituencies are concerned, the delimitation which is done as per section 10 of the act is based on the percentage of population of the s.c. and s.t, communities. the purpose, intent and the meal to provide the required .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 09 2005 (HC)

Chief Electoral Officer Vs. Sunny Joseph

Court : Kerala

Reported in : 2005(4)KLT599

..... )klt567 and state of a.p. v. govardhanlal pitti, : [2003]2scr908 . counsel therefore submitted that the notification issued by the delimitation commission can be questioned before this court.7. parliament in the 53rd year of the republic of india has enacted the delimitation act 2002 to provide for the readjustment of the allocation of seats in the house of the people to the states ..... nullity.8. we may in this connection refer to some of the parallel provisions contained in panchayat raj act and municipalities act. after the introduction of part ix in the constitution of india by the 73rd amendment act 1992 and part ixa by the seventy fourth amendment act 1992, the apex court had occasion to consider the jurisdiction of high courts with regard to matters referred .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 23 2005 (HC)

CochIn Port Trust Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Reported in : (2007)8VST184(Ker)

..... to clause (29a) of article 366 of the constitution of india. clause (29a) was inserted by the constitution (forty-sixth amendment) act, 1982.tamil nadu general sales tax act, 1959:6. the definition clauses contained in the tngst act under section 2(g) and 2(d) have already been dealt with by the apex court in madras port trust's case ..... enumerated in list i, list ii and the concurrent list in the seventh schedule. the entries in the lists of the seventh schedule are designed to define and delimit the respective areas of legislative competence of the union and the state legislatures. in the constitution there is separation of legislative powers between parliament and the state legislatures. ..... contract was also questioned. various other contentions were also raised. the tribunal disposed of both t. a. no. 1 of 2000 and t. a. no. 143 of 2003 along with t. a. no. 162 of 2000 upholding various directions given by the appellate authority.4. the question as to whether port trust is a dealer under .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 28 2006 (HC)

Mathai K.V. Vs. State of Co-operative Election Commission and ors.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : 2008(1)KLJ194

..... a co-operative society is concerned, although there is a co-operative election commission appointed under the kerala co-operative societies act, the act and rules do not envisage such a function on the co-operative election commission for delimitation of wards. this is clear from the fact that by ext. r4(c) the election commission themselves directed the director ..... the action of the director board and ext. p4. according to them, despite bye-law 31 (b), hitherto the elections to the director board have been conducted without delimitation of the area of operation of the society into wards, including the last election. in keeping with the practice ext. r4(a) resolution for conducting election and for ..... that 2 members are to be nominated by the deputy registrar. of course in view of amendment of the 2nd proviso to section 28(1) by act 19 of 1987 read with section 31(4) of the act it may be presumed that act 19 of 1987 takes away the power of the government to nominate members even if the bye .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 08 2009 (HC)

Abu Kunhimuhammad V.V. Vs. Returning Officer and ors.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : 2009(2)KLJ569

..... which provides a bar to interference by courts in electoral matters stricto senso, those provisions apply only to the questioning of the validity of any law relating to delimitation of constituencies and elections to the house of parliament, the house or either house of the legislature of a state and panchayats and municipalities, the restrictions by ..... rules enabling the returning officer or the commission to undo the process of election which had commenced. the learned senior counsel further argued that with the amendments to the rules in 1998, there is no secrecy in the election to the president and vice-president and therefore, the fact that another member would ..... decisions of statutory bodies such as on a case of mala fide or arbitrary exercise of power being made out or the statutory body being shown to have acted in breach of law.(4) without interrupting, obstructing or delaying the progress of the election proceedings, judicial intervention is available if assistance of the court has .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 01 2010 (HC)

Chirayinkeezhu A. Babu Vs. Delimitation Commission

Court : Kerala

Reported in : 2010(2)KLJ957

..... 18.1.2008. therefore, it cannot be said that the commission had become functus officio in terms of annexure d, delimitation amendment order, 2008. sub-section (6) of section 10 of the delimitation act, 2002 was amended by fixing 31st july, 2008 as the final date for completion and publication of orders. it is clear that the ..... on behalf of the respondents, various documents have been produced. annexure a is the guidelines prescribed by the delimitation commission for the purpose of completing the whole exercise. annexure b is the photo copy of the delimitation (amendment) ordinances, 2008 and annexure c is the photo copy of the presidential order issued under articles 82 ..... dated 18.2.2008 that after the census commission of india published the relevant figures of the 2001 census on 31.12.2003, the delimitation commission of india commenced the work of delimitation of parliamentary and assembly constituencies from 2004. final orders have been published as on the date of filing of the said .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 06 2015 (HC)

Binu T.S. Vs. The State Co-Operative Election Commission

Court : Kerala

..... 1st january, 2015 to 31st december, 2015 or till the date of conducting election to the committees after duly registering bye-laws in accordance with the provisions of the said amendment act, whichever is earlier." 4 wp(c) nos.4590 & 7121 of 2015 5. it cannot be said that the bye-laws have been 'duly' registered in accordance with the provisions of ..... original main wards will creep into the present 11 wards is unknown. it can safely be concluded that the bye-laws have not been amended to be in accord with the third proviso to section 28 of the act. 3 wp(c) nos.4590 & 7121 of 2015 4. the bank under these circumstances can certainly take refuge under the order of exemption ..... members and one seat for a member belonging to scheduled caste or scheduled tribe as per section 28a(1) of the act. the general body mooted an amendment of the bye-laws to increase the number of wards from 9 to 11. amendment was also mooted to reserve three seats for women members and one seat for a 2 wp(c) nos.4590 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 16 2015 (HC)

Paul Chacko Vs. The Managing Committee of the Kerala State Co-Operativ ...

Court : Kerala

..... , especially with reference to the facts of the matter and the statutory position existing then. once it is admitted that either the act or the rule has suffered a change by way of amendment or otherwise, it is incumbent for the court to take into account only the said regnant rule for determining the rights of the ..... there were to be any obliteration of the said sub-rules, the authorities ought not to have taken the trouble of amending them. indeed, the contention has sufficient force; however, the question is, can an executive act by way of sub-delegation nullify the impact of `primary' delegated legislation? 54. a perusal of exhibit p9 makes it ..... clear that the amendment was only for effecting promotions to the existing employees in the bank. it has further been specifically laid .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 21 2015 (HC)

T.A.Antony @ Jayan Thirunilath Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

..... counsel for the petitioners, the learned government pleader, the learned standing counsel for the kerala state election commission and the learned standing counsel for the kerala state delimitation commission.6. the learned standing counsel for the kerala state election commission, inviting my attention to para 3 w.p.(c) no. 27774 of 2014 ..... 27774 of 2014 ..5.. however, on a perusal of the said decision, it can be seen that the same was pronounced before the commencement of 47th amendment of the constitution. therefore, the same cannot be relied on for the purpose of this case. in the result, the writ petition is disposed of directing ..... strength of panchayaths and municipalities under section 6 of the kerala panchayath raj act/kerala municipality act. it is further submitted that the said exercise is yet to be initiated; and only thereafter, the delimitation commission can commence the task of delimitation of constituencies.7. the learned senior government pleader submitted that in the light .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //