Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: delimitation amendment act 2003 section 4 amendment of section 8 Court: kerala Page 6 of about 6,923 results (0.304 seconds)

Jul 21 2008 (HC)

Santhosh Madhavan @ Amrutha Chaithanya Vs. C.i. of Police and anr.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : 2008CriLJ4246; 2008(2)KarLJ826; 2008(3)KLT558

..... cases may be irreparable.37. may be, taking all these facts into consideration. in the state of andhra pradesh, the offence under section 354 ipc was amended as per ipc '(andhra pradesh amendment) act, 1991, act no. 6 of 1991, section 2', which came into force on april 1, 1991 vide goms no. 165, dt. 25-3-1992) and ..... extent. this can be done at the state level itself. hence, i take this opportunity to alert the lawmaking authority in the state to consider whether suitable amendments can be brought in, to section 354 ipc for protecting the child/woman from sexual assaults other than which are covered by section 375 ipc. this may be ..... the petitioner and those crimes are under investigation. all these crimes were brought to light only after a complaint was filed by a non-resident indian lady in 2003 regarding cheating committed by the petitioner. because of petitioner's strong influence, petitioner was evading arrest warrant issued by interpol and despite the publication is considered by .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 03 2005 (HC)

Sanjeev Vs. Karanakodam Sri Venkitachalapathy Devaswom

Court : Kerala

Reported in : AIR2005Ker302; 2005(3)KLT874

..... section 92 of the code of civil procedure. earlier, by order dated 10.12.2002, the district court had allowed the application. defendants filed c.r.p.no. 694 of 2003 before this court. by order dated 15.3.2004, a learned single judge of this court allowed the revision and remanded the case to the trial court. the trial court ..... 92 c.p.c. in fact the above decision was followed by the learned single judge while remanding the case to the sub court in c.r.p.no. 694/2003.8. in this case the first defendant is described as karanakodam sri venkita chalapathy devaswom. the case of the plaintiffs is that the said devaswom is a hindu religious public .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 17 2006 (HC)

Candid Indstries Vs. Commissioner of Commercial Taxes and anr.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : (2007)5VST381(Ker)

..... 10) the department can demand tax at 12.5 per cent only from the date of the gazette notification, dated january 28, 2006. the amended clause (d) of sub-section (1) of section 6 vide amendment act 39 of 2005 was notified by the government in the gazette only with effect from january 28, 2006.4. learned government pleader sri georgekutty ..... appellant is an item falling under item 164(10) 'esters of unsaturated a cyclic monoacids not elsewhere specified' of the third schedule to the kerala value added tax act, 2003 under which tax payable for the sale of the item shall not exceed four per cent. the sales tax officer found no reason to accept the said request which ..... the commissioner has however failed to consider the question as to whether the super glue falls under item 164(10) of the third schedule to the kerala value added tax act, 2003 or not.3. sri v.m. kurian, counsel appearing for the appellant, submitted that the item would fall under item 164(10) of the third schedule. reliance was .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 09 1971 (HC)

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Shri Shaila Industrial and Spiritual Co ...

Court : Kerala

Reported in : [1973]87ITR175(Ker)

..... of registering memoranda of association which, under the clause relating to objects, contain paragraph after paragraph not specifying or delimiting the proposed trade or purpose, but confusing power with purpose and indicating every class of act which the corporation is to have power to do. the practice is not one of recent growth. it was ..... in paragraph 2(b) to 2(f). so understood, there cannot be any difficulty in holding that the memorandum of association as it originally stood before its amendment was for achieving the primary objects of charitable purpose. we must also refer to paragraph 2(p) which enjoins that the shrishaila industrial & spiritual colony charities is ..... being used and utilised only for the common moral, literary, scientific, medical and spiritual well-being of the public in general.' we shall also refer to the amended memorandum which is at page 23, annexure 'a'. the words ' and take any managing agencies' which occurred in the original memorandum in paragraph 2(a) have .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 28 2008 (HC)

Finimole T.P. Vs. Asstt. Commissioner and anr.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : 2008(2)KLJ60; (2009)24VST385(Ker)

..... the assessing authority, after issuing notice to the petitioner, has proceeded to pass a protective assessment order under section 26 of the kerala value added tax act, 2003 ('kvat act' for short), inter alia, directing the petitioner to pay huge tax liability. pursuant to the orders so passed, has also issued exhibit p8 and p9 ..... petitioner has alternate remedy, in the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, we are not inclined to relegate the petitioner to avail the alternate remedy provided under the act.13. the supreme court in the following decisions, lalji haridas v. income tax officer and anr. : [1961]43itr387(sc) , and jagannath hanumanbux v. income tax ..... explained by the apex court in several of its decisions. one leading case is dr. partap singh and anr. v. director of enforcement, foreign exchange regulation act and ors. : 1986crilj824 . in the said decision, the court has observed that:the expression 'reason to believe' is not synonymous with subjective satisfaction of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 19 2007 (HC)

C.M. Ibrahim and ors. Vs. Kulangara Veetil Koya Moideen Kutty and ors.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : 2008(1)KLJ1

..... favour. ext. a 26 is the judgment regarding the mosque in another unit. this judgment shows that the 'a - party' is administering that mosque pursuant to the election held in 2003 and 2006. ext. a 29 is the newspaper report showing that the members of the 'b - party' had asserted that they would grab the mosque. ext. a30 shows that ..... its general secretary. the mosque was constructed with public funds in the year 1999. in the same year knm was registered as a charitable society under the societies registration act, 1860. the administration of the mosque and its properties is carried on as per a registered bye-law. the bye-law envisages a five tier structure consisting of the ..... 145 cr.p.c. is the question of possession, the sub divisional magistrate has gone to the extent of deciding the validity of the elections allegedly conducted in the years 2003 and 2006 as contended by the 'a - party'. when the civil court had already passed an interim order, the s.d.m. should have taken off his hands .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 03 2010 (HC)

Nobbey, and anr. Vs. State of Kerala, and ors.

Court : Kerala

..... has been seized, the same shall be confiscated to government or disposed of, in such a manner as may be prescribed. under sub section 2 of section 1, the amending act shall deemed to have come into force on 30/3/1996 and the remaining provisions shall be deemed to have come into force on 7/12/2009. therefore, section 67 ..... a which was inserted by abkari (amendment) act 3 of 2010 came into force w.e.f. 6/12/2009. in such circumstances, if the offence alleged was committed it can only b under section 67 a. ..... were transporting it in the autorickshaw, were purchased from ksbc shop at karimkunnam. question is what is the offence attracted. 5. this court in sabu v. state of kerala (2003 (2) klt 173) considered an identical question and held that when there is no case for the prosecution that accused were transporting illicity liquor or they have illegally imported liquor .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 05 1976 (HC)

Rt. Rev. Msgr. Mark Netto Vs. Government of Kerala and ors.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : AIR1977Ker58

..... institution to see that girls are not admitted in the school is not improper or illegal.5, faced with this situation and possibly anticipating the courts' decision the petitioner has amended the original petition to include a prayer to strike down rule 12 (iii) of chapter vi, kerala education rules, on the ground that it violates article 30(1) of ..... the kerala education rules as a school where admission to some or all the standards is restricted to girls only. a 'boys' school' is not defined either in the education act or in the rules. therefore, it must be understood in its ordinary sense namely as a school where admission to some or all of the' standards is restricted to boys ..... and so in the absence of any restriction in the order of sanction regarding admission of girls the school is a mixed school for the purpose of the kerala education act and rules and the petitioner is entitled to admit girls also in the school. ext. p-1 is the copy of the original order according sanction to open a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 17 2008 (HC)

Reckitt Benckiser (India) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner, Commercial Taxes and ...

Court : Kerala

Reported in : (2009)12VatReporter54; (2009)22VST459(Ker)

..... , appearing for the respondent.2. the supreme court has specifically directed this court to consider rules of interpretation of the kerala value added tax act, 2003, hereinafter called the 'act' and to decide the matter with reference to the said rules as well. the order under challenge is clarification issued by the commissioner of commercial ..... was on the unamended provision and we are concerned only with validity of the clarification issued by the commissioner under section 94 of the act. therefore the effect of amendment is left open for consideration and adjudication by the assessing officer in the course of assessment as the appellant has not sought clarification for ..... the period after amendment.6. the remaining products of the appellant, which are covered by main clarification order against which this appeal is filed are the products sold .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 23 2007 (HC)

A.M. Prabhakaran and ors. Vs. Chithappa Sulaikabi

Court : Kerala

Reported in : 2008(1)KLJ109; AIR2007NOC1100(SB)

..... order for eviction is liable to be re-opened under the proviso to section 3 of the delhi rent control (amendment) act, 1976, (18 of 1976).(b) any person to whom a licence, as defined by section 52 of the indian easements act, 1881 (5 of 1882) has been granted.explanation ii- if the person, who acquires, by succession, the ..... of the deceased tenant who had been living with him as a member of the family up to the date of his death. but by reason of the amendment effected by act 7/66 to be effective from 20-7-1966, the definition has been expanded to include heir or heirs of the deceased tenant irrespective whether they are living ..... : [2003]2scr259 .when the heirs of a tenant acquire benefit under the act, the same would be subject to such limitation and liability which has been provided under the act.but while including heirs also in the definition of tenant in the act, the legislature has not intended or indicated any limitation or restriction. on the other hand, before the amendment of the .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //