Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: delhi rent control act 1958 repealed section 56 power to make rules Court: karnataka dharwad Page 1 of about 22 results (0.106 seconds)

Sep 21 2022 (HC)

Ghodawat Industries India Private Limited Vs. Union Of India

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... 1. union of india, rep. by under secretary to the government of india, ministry of finance, department of revenue, room no.46, north block, new delhi-110001.2. the commissioner of central tax (earlier known as the commissioner of central excise), bengaluru i commissionerate, pb no.5400, queens road, bengaluru-560001.3 ..... or may become due or any forfeiture or punishment incurred or inflicted in respect of any offence or violation committed against the provisions of the amended act or repealed acts; or (e) affect any investigation, inquiry, verification (including scrutiny and audit), assessment proceedings, adjudication and any other legal proceedings or recovery of ..... writ direction, order quashing the notification no.3 of2019 dated0607.2019, issued by the first respondent, purporting to exercise power under section5a) of central excise act,1944, levying central excise on tobacco and tobacco products a copy of the said notification is produced herewith as annexure-a & etc., in w.p. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 21 2022 (HC)

Ghodawat Packers Llp Vs. Union Of India

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... 1. union of india, rep. by under secretary to the government of india, ministry of finance, department of revenue, room no.46, north block, new delhi-110001.2. the commissioner of central tax (earlier known as the commissioner of central excise), bengaluru i commissionerate, pb no.5400, queens road, bengaluru-560001.3 ..... or may become due or any forfeiture or punishment incurred or inflicted in respect of any offence or violation committed against the provisions of the amended act or repealed acts; or (e) affect any investigation, inquiry, verification (including scrutiny and audit), assessment proceedings, adjudication and any other legal proceedings or recovery of ..... writ direction, order quashing the notification no.3 of2019 dated0607.2019, issued by the first respondent, purporting to exercise power under section5a) of central excise act,1944, levying central excise on tobacco and tobacco products a copy of the said notification is produced herewith as annexure-a & etc., in w.p. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 21 2022 (HC)

Ghodawat Foods International Private Limited Vs. Union Of India

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... 1. union of india, rep. by under secretary to the government of india, ministry of finance, department of revenue, room no.46, north block, new delhi-110001.2. the commissioner of central tax (earlier known as the commissioner of central excise), bengaluru i commissionerate, pb no.5400, queens road, bengaluru-560001.3 ..... or may become due or any forfeiture or punishment incurred or inflicted in respect of any offence or violation committed against the provisions of the amended act or repealed acts; or (e) affect any investigation, inquiry, verification (including scrutiny and audit), assessment proceedings, adjudication and any other legal proceedings or recovery of ..... writ direction, order quashing the notification no.3 of2019 dated0607.2019, issued by the first respondent, purporting to exercise power under section5a) of central excise act,1944, levying central excise on tobacco and tobacco products a copy of the said notification is produced herewith as annexure-a & etc., in w.p. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 21 2022 (HC)

M/s.h.i. Tamboli @ Sons Vs. Union Of India

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... 1. union of india, rep. by under secretary to the government of india, ministry of finance, department of revenue, room no.46, north block, new delhi-110001.2. the commissioner of central tax (earlier known as the commissioner of central excise), bengaluru i commissionerate, pb no.5400, queens road, bengaluru-560001.3 ..... or may become due or any forfeiture or punishment incurred or inflicted in respect of any offence or violation committed against the provisions of the amended act or repealed acts; or (e) affect any investigation, inquiry, verification (including scrutiny and audit), assessment proceedings, adjudication and any other legal proceedings or recovery of ..... writ direction, order quashing the notification no.3 of2019 dated0607.2019, issued by the first respondent, purporting to exercise power under section5a) of central excise act,1944, levying central excise on tobacco and tobacco products a copy of the said notification is produced herewith as annexure-a & etc., in w.p. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 21 2022 (HC)

M/s.balajee Pouches Vs. Union Of India

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... 1. union of india, rep. by under secretary to the government of india, ministry of finance, department of revenue, room no.46, north block, new delhi-110001.2. the commissioner of central tax (earlier known as the commissioner of central excise), bengaluru i commissionerate, pb no.5400, queens road, bengaluru-560001.3 ..... or may become due or any forfeiture or punishment incurred or inflicted in respect of any offence or violation committed against the provisions of the amended act or repealed acts; or (e) affect any investigation, inquiry, verification (including scrutiny and audit), assessment proceedings, adjudication and any other legal proceedings or recovery of ..... writ direction, order quashing the notification no.3 of2019 dated0607.2019, issued by the first respondent, purporting to exercise power under section5a) of central excise act,1944, levying central excise on tobacco and tobacco products a copy of the said notification is produced herewith as annexure-a & etc., in w.p. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 21 2022 (HC)

M/s. Rajnandini Foods Pvt. Ltd., Vs. Union Of India

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... 1. union of india, rep. by under secretary to the government of india, ministry of finance, department of revenue, room no.46, north block, new delhi-110001.2. the commissioner of central tax (earlier known as the commissioner of central excise), bengaluru i commissionerate, pb no.5400, queens road, bengaluru-560001.3 ..... or may become due or any forfeiture or punishment incurred or inflicted in respect of any offence or violation committed against the provisions of the amended act or repealed acts; or (e) affect any investigation, inquiry, verification (including scrutiny and audit), assessment proceedings, adjudication and any other legal proceedings or recovery of ..... writ direction, order quashing the notification no.3 of2019 dated0607.2019, issued by the first respondent, purporting to exercise power under section5a) of central excise act,1944, levying central excise on tobacco and tobacco products a copy of the said notification is produced herewith as annexure-a & etc., in w.p. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 26 2019 (HC)

Ganesh Miskin @ Ganesh @ Ganu Bain Vs. The State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... purposes of habeas corpus proceedings. jail or prison but rather in 10. a perusal of the dictionaries thus discloses that the concept that is created is the controlling of a persons liberty in the course of a criminal investigation, or curtailing in a substantial or significant manner a persons freedom of action. our attention has ..... 439 cr.p.c. therefore, this case does not provide us any assistance whatsoever. in another case, central bureau of investigation, special investigation cell- i, new delhi v. anupam j.kulkarni manu/sc/0335/19 1992 crilj2768their lordships observed in paragraph 11 as follows :"in one occurrence it might so happen that the accused might have ..... for the reason mentioned in clause (b). so also it is beneficial to note the provisions of sections 3 and 6 of the prisoners (attendance in courts) act, 1955 (prisoners act for short), which reads thus: : crl.p. no.100871 of20193. power of courts, to require appearance of prisoners to give evidence or answer a charge.- .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 07 2017 (HC)

Shri Shivanand Tippayy Naik Vs. The Divisional Manager

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... accident and not subsequently renewed within the statutory period of thirty days would not fulfill the requirement of duly licensed under section 149(2)(a)(ii) of the act. the full bench also observed that, it cannot be said that validity of driving licence continues to exists unless it is shown that the licensee had been ..... of road traffic accident and was not renewed within the statutory period would fulfill the requirement of duly licensed under section 149(2)(a)(ii) of the motor vehicles act, 1988?. . the larger bench after referring to several cases of the hon ble supreme court including the judgment in the case of national insurance co.ltd., vs. ..... one year 13 days, during which period the driving licence was not got renewed, the alleged incident has occurred on 20.09.2001. since the same being an act of non-renewal of driving licence, it cannot be considered as a disqualification of the driver from holding or obtaining driving licence. the appellant has further contended that .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 17 2015 (HC)

Maha Ganapati Shankara Devasthana, Sirsi and Others Vs. State of Karna ...

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... receipt of any monthly or annual grant from public revenue or any amount under the karnataka certain inams (abolition) act, 1977. ? section 24: controlling authorities: 1) the commissioner shall be the chief controlling authority in respect of all matters connected with notified institutions and he shall perform such duties and exercise such powers ..... for good and sufficient cause, suspend an executive officer or initiate disciplinary proceedings against him for any misconduct in accordance with the karnataka civil services (classification, control and appeal rules) 1957. section 48: application of the provisions of chapters vi and vii in certain cases:-notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (8) ..... mahendralal jaini vs. the state of u.p. and others, air 1963 sc 1019, (v) p.l. mehra vs. d.r. khanna and others, air 1971 delhi page 1, (vi) m/s sree chamundi mopeds limited vs. church of south india trust association, madras, air 1992 sc 1439 (vii) rudragowda vs. angadi chikanna, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 21 2012 (HC)

Ashok Vs. Pandurang and Others

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... judge made in his revisional jurisdiction under section 50(2) of the act. theapex court having noticed the rent control enactments of different states including kerala state concluded that the high court has got the ..... that we too are bound by the decision taken by this court in krishnajis case {ilr (1978)2 kant 1585)} (fb) was rendered under the karnataka rent control (amendment) act, 1975 and has held the field for over a decade. no justification has been pointed out by the high court why that should be discarded. it is ..... commissioner under section 136(3) of the act. in the case of shyamaraju hegde vs. venkatesha, air 1987 sc 2323 the question for consideration was as to whether a revision application is maintainable under section 115 of code of civil procedure read with section 50(1) of the karnataka rent control act, 1961 against the order of a district .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //