Court : Orissa
Decided on : Aug-21-1981
Reported in : AIR1982Ori20; 52(1981)CLT402
..... favour. it is not disputed that by a general order of the registrar all deputy registrars have been authorised to exercise the power of supersession under section 32 of the act (vide annexure d). it appears from government notification dated 13th nov., 1980 (annexure c) that shri b. p. guru, the deputy registrar ..... reasons for the same.7. in the case of state of mysore v. shivabasappa shivappa, air 1963 sc 375 it was laid down that domestic tribunals are not courts and that they are therefore not bound to follow the procedure prescribed for trial of actions in courts. nor are they bound by ..... notice. 5. the next contention is that the order of supersession is vitiated as no opportunity of personal hearing was given to the petitioner. section 32(1) of the act provides as follows :'32. supersession of committee and power to disqualify officers of the society :-- (1) if, in the opinion of the ..... and it was not felt necessary to give a personal hearing to the petitioner.4. the first contention is that initiation of action under section 32 of the act without complying with the requirements of subsection (4) thereof is bad in law and consequently the order of supersession is vitiated. reliance is ..... contravened must be judged not by any preconceived notion on what they may be but in the light of the provisions of the relevant act. this principle was reaffirmed in air 1958 sc 398, (nagendra nath bora v. commr. of hills division).9. mr. r. mohanty, the learned counsel for the petitioner .....
Tag this Judgment!