Court : Chennai
Reported in : [1992]85STC54(Mad)
Mishra, J. 1. The Revenue has appealed against the order of the Tamil Nadu Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal (Additional Bench), Madras, under which the respondent/assessee's appeal has been allowed and the order of the Appellate Assistant Commissioner under which he held that the appeal was barred by limitation, has been set aside. 2. The assessing officer's order dated September 17, 1986, was communicated to the assessee on October 18, 1986. He preferred an appeal before the Appellate Assistant Commissioner as provided under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 on December 18, 1986. Taking notice of an amendment which came into effect from December 17, 1986, a day before the filing of the appeal, the Appellate Assistant Commissioner held that the appeal was barred by limitation. The Tribunal, however, has held that the appeal was not barred by limitation and that the Appellate Assistant Commissioner had committed an error of law in rejecting the appeal on the ground of limitation. I...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :03. 01.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA W.P.No.22849 of 2007 S.Muralidharan .. Petitioner -vs- 1. Government of India rep.by Secretary Ministry of External Affairs New Delhi 2. Government of India rep.by Regional Passport Officer Regional Passport Office 26, Shastri Bhavan Haddows Road Chennai 600 006 3. The Collector of Chennai Rajaji Salai Chennai 600 001 4. Government of India rep.by the Under Secretary I.C.Section Ministry of Home Affairs Lok Nayak Bhavan Khan Market New Delhi (R4 impleaded as per Court order dated 13.2.2009 in M.P.No.1 of 2008 in W.P.No.22849 of 2007) 5. The Chief Immigration Officer No.26, Shastri Bhavan Annex Haddows Road Nungambakkam Chennai 600 034 (R5 impleaded as per order of Court dated 3.1.2014 in M.P.No.2 of 2013 in W.P.No.22849 of 2007) .. Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issue of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records conne...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated: 04.04.2014 Coram THE HONOURABLE Ms.JUSTICE K.B.K.VASUKI Crl.R.C.No.1190 of 2012 and M.P.No.1 of 2012 A.Shankar .Petitioner versus The Deputy Superintendent of Police Cyber Crime Cell, Crime Branch CID Guindy, Chennai 600 032.Respondent Prayer:- Criminal Revision filed under Section 397 r/w 401 Cr.P.C.to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order dated 17.8.2012 made in Crl.M.P.No.157/2012 in SC.No.192/2009 passed by the XV Additional Sessions Judge in-charge of XIX Additional Sessions Judge, Chennai-1 and to quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Vijendran For Respondent : Mr.C.Iyyapparaj, GA(Crl.Side) ORDER This criminal revision is filed against the order made in Crl.MP.157/2012 in SC.No.192/2009, in and under which, the petition filed by the petitioner/accused for altering the charges framed by the respondent in accordance with the provisions of the Information Technology Act, 2008 was dismissed. 2.Few facts, which are relev...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 06.12.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr.R.K.AGRAWAL, THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRABAABU W.A.No.2364 of 2013 and M.P.Nos.1, 2 and 3 of 2013 Medical Council of India, presently under Board of Governors in Supersession of Medical Council of India, Through its Chairman, Pocket 14, Sector-8, Dwarka, Phase-1, New Delhi.Appellant ..vs.1.The Registrar/Returning Officer, Tamil Nadu Dr.M.G.R.Medical University, Rep. By its Registrar, No.69, Anna Salai, Guindy, Chennai 600 032. 2.Tamil Nadu Dr.M.G.R.Medical University, Rep. By its Registrar, No.69, Anna Salai, Guindy, Chennai 600 032. 3.Dr.L.P.Thangavelu 4.The Secretary to Government of India, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Nirman Bhawan, New Delhi 110 115...Respondents Prayer:Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order passed by the learned Single Judge in M.P.No.7 of 2013 in W.P.No.23914 of 2013 dated 19.11.2013. For Appellant : Mr.V.P.Ram...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for records of 2nd respondent comprised in order dated 22.04.2016 bearing reference No FRRO Chennai Ref No.16840 quash the same as arbitrary, illegal, unconstitutional and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to register the petitioner as OCI and issue appropriate certificate without insisting upon custody order of guardianship in the hands of his mother from court of law.) 1. By consent, the Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal. 2. The deponent of the affidavit, is mother of the minor, namely, A.Aniswar. The deponent would state that she is an Indian Citizen holding an Indian Passport No.NN0276593. The marriage between the deponent and one Asok Kumar was solemnized as per the Hindu Rights and Customs on 28.08.1998 at Trichy and the husband of the deponent is a Malaysian Citizen, holding Malaysian Passport. After the marriage, for a brief peri...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
Reported in : (2003)2MLJ785
ORDERV. Kanakaraj, J.1. These two revisions are filed against the order dated 28.08.1996 in R.C.A. No. 3 of 1993 and 2 of 1993 on the file of the Appellate Authority (Subordinate Judge, Krishnagiri), against the orders passed in R.C.O.P. No. 11 of 1990 and 9 of 1990 on the file of the Rent Controller (District Munsif, Hosur).2. The averments in R.C.O.P. No. 9 of 1990 are that the petitioner is a tenant of a shop belonging to the respondent herein on a monthly rent of Rs. 300/-; that the respondent having received the rent promptly up to July 1998, issued receipts therefor; that thereafter, the respondent did not receive the rent at all; that he did not issue receipt for the payments made for three months; that the respondent did not respond to the petitioner's request to name the bank in which he could deposit the rent; that the petitioner had paid Rs. 5,000/- as advance; that on 18.4.1990, the respondent sent a notice to the petitioner to which the petitioner sent a reply on 16.5.1990...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
Reported in : AIR1952Mad650; (1951)IMLJ588
Govinda Menon, J.1. The suit out of which this appeal arises was for a declaration of the plaintiff's title and right of management as well as for recovery of possession, of the suit house together with past and future rent or damages by way of use and occupation. The Subordinate Judge of Coimbatore has held that the plaintiff is entitled to the property claimed by him with all the rights of management of the said property; but the relief for possession was disallowed. There is a further direction that the plaintiff is entitled to collect the rents from such of the defendants as are occupying portions of the suit house and utilise the funds for the ceremonies stipulated in the will of Ranoji Rao. There were directions regarding deposit of rent by the second to the fourth defendant along with the order to pay future rent at the same rate. Other minor reliefs were awarded to the plaintiff which it is not necessary to mention in detail. The first defendant has appealed against that decisi...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: -4-2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH O.S.A.Nos.36 and 37 of 2012 O.S.A.No.36 of 2012 F.Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd Group Headquarter Grenzacherstrassee 124 CH-4070 Basel Switzerland Represented by its constituted attorney Ms.Sujatha Subramaniam OSI Pharmaceuticals, LLC. 1 Bioscience Park Drive, Farmingdale, New York 11735, United States of America Represented by its constituted attorney Ms.Sujatha Subramaniam Earlier known as OSI Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 41, Pinelawn Road, Melville, New York 11747, United States of America Represented by its constituted attorney Ms.Sujatha Subramaniam .. Appellants. Versus Intas Biopharmaceuticals Limited Plot No.423/P/A Sarkhej-Bavla Highway, Moraiya, Taluka-Sanand, 382210 Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India. .. Respondent. Prayer in O.S.A.No.36 of 2012: Original Side Appeal filed under Order XXXVI Rule 9 of Original Side Rules read with Clause 15 of Letters Pate...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 and 2 to hand over the vacant possession of the premises to the petitioners in Survey Nos.46/1B and 46/2A1 at Four Roads, Salem District and consequently, to pay the arrears of rent from the year 2004 onwards along with interest at 18% per annum till date.) 1. The petitioners in the affidavit filed in support of this writ petition would aver as follows: 1.1. The grandfather of the petitioners, namely, late Khaderkhan, owned a land admeasuring to an extent of 9,463 sq. ft. comprising in S.Nos.46/1B and 46/2A1 at Four Roads, Salem Town. M/s.Burmah Shell Oil Storage and Distribution Company of India [now known as 'Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited'] had entered into a registered lease agreement bearing Document No.3764 of 1957 with the grandfather of the petitioners for a period of ten years from 01.11.1956 to 31.10.1966 and further, it was not extended either...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
Reported in : (1959)2MLJ402
ORDERBalakrishna Ayyar, J.1. The question for determination in all these writ petitions are the same and so we shall deal with them together.2. The relevant facts are these. Investigations carried out by the Geological Survey of India revealed that large deposits of brown coal or lignite lay in and around Cuddalore and Vriddhachalam Taluks in South Arcot District. The Government decided to mine this coal and for that purpose it was necessary for them to get control over the lignite-bearing areas. Meantime speculators attempted to buy up lands in the area at low prices in the expectation that prices would rise by the time Government decided to acquire the lands ; they hoped that they would be able to sell the lands to the Government at a large profit. On 6th October, 1948, Government issued a Press Note which said inter alia:To prevent such speculative dealings, the Government propose to undertake legislation reserving to themselves the power to compel any person who has purchased land ...
Tag this Judgment!