Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Jan-19-2021
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION(C) NO.26 OF2020MANISH KUMAR PETITIONER(S) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER RESPONDENT(S) WITH WRIT PETITION (C) No.53/2020 WRIT PETITION (C) No.28/2020 WRIT PETITION (C) No.47/2020 WRIT PETITION (C) No.27/2020 WRIT PETITION (C) No.73/2020 WRIT PETITION (C) No.328/2020 WRIT PETITION (C) No.210/2020 WRIT PETITION (C) No.191/2020 WRIT PETITION (C) No.164/2020 WRIT PETITION (C) No.163/2020 WRIT PETITION (C) No.166/2020 WRIT PETITION (C) No.173/2020 WRIT PETITION (C) No.182/2020 WRIT PETITION (C) No.176/2020 WRIT PETITION (C) No.177/2020 WRIT PETITION (C) No.257/2020 WRIT PETITION (C) No.341/2020 WRIT PETITION (C) No.267/2020 WRIT PETITION (C) No.333/2020 1 WRIT PETITION (C) No.337/2020 WRIT PETITION (C) No.388/2020 WRIT PETITION (C) No.402/2020 WRIT PETITION (C) No.390/2020 WRIT PETITION (C) No.393/2020 WRIT PETITION (C) No.783/2020 TRANSFERRED CASE(C) No.228/2020 WRIT PETITION (C) No.579/2020 WRIT PETITI...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Nov-17-2021
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.6915 OF2021(@ SLP (C) No.14289 of 2004) ASSA SINGH (D) BY LRs. ...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS SHANTI PARSHAD(D)BY LRs. & OTHERS ...RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT K.M. JOSEPH, J.1. Leave granted.2. An application for Ejectment was filed by the Appellants and Proforma Respondents 2 to 21 for ejectment of Respondent No.1 on the ground of non- payment of rent. The application was filed under the Punjab Security of Land Tenures Act, 1953 hereinafter referred to as the Act. The application was allowed 1 by the Assistant Collector 1st Grade, Ferozepur by Order dated 13.09.1972. The appeal filed by the first respondent before the Collector, Ferozepur under Section 24 of the Act was dismissed vide order dated 04.09.1973. The Commissioner by order dated 04.02.1974 on revision filed by the first respondent recommended to the Financial Commissioner, Punjab for setting aside the order leaving the parties to seek relief through th...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Mar-16-2021
Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal Nos. 3766-3767 of 2020 Neena Aneja & Anr. .... Appellants Versus Jai Prakash Associates Ltd. .... Respondent 1 JUDGMENT Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J Index A. Background B. Submissions B.1. Submissions of the appellants B.2. Submissions of the respondent C. Position of law on change of forum: An analysis of precedent C.1. Venugopala Reddiar (1943- Federal Court 3 judges) C.2. Kiran Singh v. Chaman Paswan (1954- Supreme Court 4 judges) C.3. Garikapati (1957- Supreme Court Constitution Bench) C.4. Mohd. Idris (1965- Supreme Court Constitution Bench) C.5. Manujendra Dutt (1966- Supreme Court 2 judges) C.6. New India Assurance (1975- Supreme Court 3 judges) C.7. Maria Cristina (1978- Supreme Court 2 judges) C.8. Hitendra Vishnu Thakur (1994- Supreme Court 2 judges) C.9. Sudhir G Angur (2005- Supreme Court 3 judges) C.10. Ramesh Kumar Soni (2013- Supreme Court 2 judges) C.11. Dhadi Sahu (1992- Supreme Court ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Aug-06-2021
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOs. 4492-4493 OF2021AMAZON.COM NV INVESTMENT HOLDINGS LLC APPELLANT VERSUS FUTURE RETAIL LIMITED & ORS. RESPONDENTS WITH CIVIL APPEAL NOs. 4494-4495 OF2021CIVIL APPEAL NOs. 4496-4497 OF2021JUDGMENT R.F. NARIMAN, J.1. Two important questions arise in these appeals first, as to whether an award delivered by an Emergency Arbitrator under the Arbitration Rules of the Singapore International Arbitration Centre [SIAC Rules]. can be said to be an order under Section 17(1) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 [Arbitration Act].; and second, as to whether an order passed under Section 17(2) of the Arbitration Act in enforcement of 1 the award of an Emergency Arbitrator by a learned Single Judge of the High Court is appealable.2. The brief facts necessary to appreciate the context in which these two questions arise are as follows:2. 1. Proceedings were initiated by the Appellant, Amazon.com NV Investm...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Aug-17-2021
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.8238 OF2013RAJINDER KUMAR BANSAL & ORS .....APPELLANT(S) VERSUS MUNICIPAL COMMITTEE & ORS. .....RESPONDENT(S) W I T H CIVIL APPEAL No.8239 OF2013JUDGMENT HEMANT GUPTA, J.1. The landlord is in appeals aggrieved against an order passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana on 04.03.2009 whereby the club activities were not held as business within the meaning of Section 2(f) of the Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 19731 so as to apply the Act to the rented land. The High Court has set aside the orders passed by the Rent Controller as well as by the Appellate 1 Hereinafter referred to as the Act 1 Authority holding that the rented land is being put to use for the purpose of business.2. The facts leading to the present appeals are that one Telu Ram was the original owner of the property. Bhagwan Dass held occupancy rights in terms of the Punjab Tenancy Act, 1887. Bhagwan Dass earlier execu...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Mar-01-2021
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOs.4230-4234 OF2020A. Navinchandra Steels Private Limited Appellant VERSUS SREI Equipment Finance Limited & Ors. Respondents JUDGMENT R.F. Nariman, J.1. This appeal arises out of the judgment dated 07.02.2020, as corrected by order dated 21.09.2020, by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal [NCLAT].. The Appellant is an operational creditor of Respondent No.2 herein M/s. Shree Ram Urban Infrastructure Limited [SRUIL]., the company under winding up and has a decree dated 07.10.2015 in its favour passed by the Bombay High Court in Summary Suit No.626 of 2014. Vide order dated 06.10.2016, the Division Bench stayed the order dated 07.10.2015 and directed SRUIL to deposit INR14 1 crore with the Prothonotary and Senior Master of the High Court or furnish a bank guarantee for the same, failing which the stay order would get vacated. The said appeal is pending as on date. We are also informed that an exe...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Jan-19-2021
R1IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE19H DAY OF JANUARY, 2021 PRESENT THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR AND THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE B.A. PATIL W.P. NO.47747/2017 C/W W.P.NOs.433/2017, 10728/2017, 15532/2017, 16281/2017, 17180/2017, 21279/2017, 23095/2017, 23800/2017, 25219/2017, 27437/2017, 27573/2017, 32134/2017, 32849/2017, 33085/2017, 34202/2017, 35384/2017, 36324/2017, 36610/2017, 36640/2017, 36690/2017, 36760/2017, 37713/2017, 40597/2017, 41593/2017, 42959/2017, 43059/2017, 43227/2017, 44273/2017, 44687/2017, 45114/2017, 47887/2017, 50674/2017, 51160/2017, 52972/2017, 53008/2017, 54035/2017, 54081/2017, 54082/2017, 55683/2017, 56296/2017, 235/2018, 463/2018, 777/2018, 1348/2018, 1395/2018, 3032/2018, 3641/2018, 4729/2018, 5389/2018, 5390/2018, 5391/2018, 5704/2018, 6061/2018, 6330/2018, 6376/2018, 6583/2018, 6960/2018, 7868/2018, 8035/2018, 8186/2018, 8187/2018, 8189/2018, 8190/2018, 8191/2018, 8210/2018, 8585/2018, 9116/2018, 9117/2018, 9194/2018, 11029/2...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Jan-19-2021
R1IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE19H DAY OF JANUARY, 2021 PRESENT THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR AND THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE B.A. PATIL W.P. NO.47747/2017 C/W W.P.NOs.433/2017, 10728/2017, 15532/2017, 16281/2017, 17180/2017, 21279/2017, 23095/2017, 23800/2017, 25219/2017, 27437/2017, 27573/2017, 32134/2017, 32849/2017, 33085/2017, 34202/2017, 35384/2017, 36324/2017, 36610/2017, 36640/2017, 36690/2017, 36760/2017, 37713/2017, 40597/2017, 41593/2017, 42959/2017, 43059/2017, 43227/2017, 44273/2017, 44687/2017, 45114/2017, 47887/2017, 50674/2017, 51160/2017, 52972/2017, 53008/2017, 54035/2017, 54081/2017, 54082/2017, 55683/2017, 56296/2017, 235/2018, 463/2018, 777/2018, 1348/2018, 1395/2018, 3032/2018, 3641/2018, 4729/2018, 5389/2018, 5390/2018, 5391/2018, 5704/2018, 6061/2018, 6330/2018, 6376/2018, 6583/2018, 6960/2018, 7868/2018, 8035/2018, 8186/2018, 8187/2018, 8189/2018, 8190/2018, 8191/2018, 8210/2018, 8585/2018, 9116/2018, 9117/2018, 9194/2018, 11029/2...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Jan-19-2021
R1IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE19H DAY OF JANUARY, 2021 PRESENT THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR AND THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE B.A. PATIL W.P. NO.47747/2017 C/W W.P.NOs.433/2017, 10728/2017, 15532/2017, 16281/2017, 17180/2017, 21279/2017, 23095/2017, 23800/2017, 25219/2017, 27437/2017, 27573/2017, 32134/2017, 32849/2017, 33085/2017, 34202/2017, 35384/2017, 36324/2017, 36610/2017, 36640/2017, 36690/2017, 36760/2017, 37713/2017, 40597/2017, 41593/2017, 42959/2017, 43059/2017, 43227/2017, 44273/2017, 44687/2017, 45114/2017, 47887/2017, 50674/2017, 51160/2017, 52972/2017, 53008/2017, 54035/2017, 54081/2017, 54082/2017, 55683/2017, 56296/2017, 235/2018, 463/2018, 777/2018, 1348/2018, 1395/2018, 3032/2018, 3641/2018, 4729/2018, 5389/2018, 5390/2018, 5391/2018, 5704/2018, 6061/2018, 6330/2018, 6376/2018, 6583/2018, 6960/2018, 7868/2018, 8035/2018, 8186/2018, 8187/2018, 8189/2018, 8190/2018, 8191/2018, 8210/2018, 8585/2018, 9116/2018, 9117/2018, 9194/2018, 11029/2...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Jan-19-2021
R1IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE19H DAY OF JANUARY, 2021 PRESENT THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR AND THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE B.A. PATIL W.P. NO.47747/2017 C/W W.P.NOs.433/2017, 10728/2017, 15532/2017, 16281/2017, 17180/2017, 21279/2017, 23095/2017, 23800/2017, 25219/2017, 27437/2017, 27573/2017, 32134/2017, 32849/2017, 33085/2017, 34202/2017, 35384/2017, 36324/2017, 36610/2017, 36640/2017, 36690/2017, 36760/2017, 37713/2017, 40597/2017, 41593/2017, 42959/2017, 43059/2017, 43227/2017, 44273/2017, 44687/2017, 45114/2017, 47887/2017, 50674/2017, 51160/2017, 52972/2017, 53008/2017, 54035/2017, 54081/2017, 54082/2017, 55683/2017, 56296/2017, 235/2018, 463/2018, 777/2018, 1348/2018, 1395/2018, 3032/2018, 3641/2018, 4729/2018, 5389/2018, 5390/2018, 5391/2018, 5704/2018, 6061/2018, 6330/2018, 6376/2018, 6583/2018, 6960/2018, 7868/2018, 8035/2018, 8186/2018, 8187/2018, 8189/2018, 8190/2018, 8191/2018, 8210/2018, 8585/2018, 9116/2018, 9117/2018, 9194/2018, 11029/2...
Tag this Judgment!