Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-21-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: November 22, 2018 Pronounced on: December 21, 2018 + W.P.(C) 12133/2018 & CM471312018 1. THE ASSOCIATED JOURNALS LTD AND ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Dr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi, Senior Advocate with Mr. Dev Datt Kamat, Mr. Sunil Fernandes, Ms. Priyansha Indra Sharma, Mr. Rajesh Inamdar, Mr. Javedur Rahman, Ms. Madhavi Khanna and Mr. Aditya Bhatt, Advocates Versus LAND AND DEVELOPMENT OFFICE .....Respondent Through: Mr. Tushar Mehta, Solicitor General with Ms. Maninder Acharya, ASG and Dr. Rajesh Gogna, CGSC CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT Associated Journals Limited was incorporated on 20th November, 1937 and in the year 2002, its Chairman-cum-Managing Director was Mr. Motilal Vora, who was also the Treasurer of All India Congress Committee (for short AICC). AJL was an unlisted public company, which was having 1057 shareholders as of 2010. Way back in the year 1962-63, land measuring 0.3365 acres was allotted to pet...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-18-2018
+ IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: December 06, 2018 Judgment delivered on: December 18, 2018 FAO(OS) 15/2018 & CM. No.3021/2018 JASDEEP SINGH KALSI Through: Mr. Raman Kapur, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Mohit Khanna, Adv. ..... Appellant versus THE STATE & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sindhwani, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Aman Nandrajog, Adv. for R-2 AND + FAO(OS) 19/2018 & CM. No.3261/2018 JASDEEP SINGH KALSI ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Raman Kapur, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Mohit Khanna, Adv. versus THE STATE & ORS Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sindhwani, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Aman Nandrajog, Adv. for R-2 ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO FAO (OS) Nos. 15/2018 & 19/2018 Page 1 of 37 JUDGMENT V. KAMESWAR RAO, J1 These two appeals have been filed by S. Jasdeep Singh Kalsi challenging the order of the learned Single Judge in TEST.CAS. Nos. 57/2009 and 40/2016, whereby the learned Single Judge has granted probate of the Will...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-17-2018
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Delivered on:17. 12.2018 W.P.(C) 8842/2018 & CM APPL. 33999/2018, 34000/2018, 41432/2018 ALL INDIA IDBI OFFICERS ASSOCIATION THROUGH ITS GENERAL SECRETARY ........ Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr Prashant Bhushan, Mr Pranav Sachdeva and Mr Jatin Bhardwaj, Advocates For the Respondent : Mr Tushar Mehta, Solicitor General and Ms Maninder Acharya, ASG and Mr Kirtiman Singh, CGSC alongwith Mr Waize Ali Noor, Mr Prateek Dhanda, Ms Shruti Dutt, Mr Viplav Acharya, Mr Sahil Sood Mr Sameer Malik, Mr Ravi Prakash and Mr Farman Ali, Mr Kamal Mehta and Mr Harshul Chowdhry, Advocates for UOI/LIC. Mr Sandeep Sethi, Senior Advocate with Mr Krishnendu Dutta, Mr Sidhartha Barua and Mr A. Gupta, Advocates for R-3. Mr H.S. Parihar and Mr K.S. Parihar, Advocates for RBI. Mr Rana Mukherjee, Senior Advocate with Mr Dipak K. Nag, Mr Apurva Upmanyu and Ms Ekta Pradh...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-17-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:6. h December, 2018 Pronounced on:17. h December, 2018 + W.P.(C) 7954/2017 & CM APPL. 17926/2018 SHRI RAM KRISHAN PARMHANS SHIKSHA PARISHAD Through: Mr. Raju .Petitioner Ramachandran, Senior Advocate, Mr. Amitesh Kumar, Ms. Binisa Mohanty and Mr. Ishwar Mohanty, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Vikas Singh, Sr. Adv. with Mr P.S. Singh and Mr.Zeeshan Ansari, Advocates for the... RESPONDENTS. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT The petitioner Shri Ram Krishan Paramhans Shiksha Parishad % 1. assails, by the present writ petition, order, dated 10th August, 2017, issued by the Ministry of Ayurveda, Yoga and Naturopathy, Unani, Siddha and Homeopathy (AYUSH) (Respondent No.2 herein), whereby the application, of the petitioner, for permission to start a new Ayurveda college, with 100 seats, and to confer BAMS degrees, on the basis thereof, for the academic session 2017-18, has be...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-06-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Reserved on:29. h November 2018 Pronounced on:7. h December, 2018 W.P.(C) 580/2016 GURCHARAN SINGH SODHI ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Madhusmita Bora, Md. Fareed Siddiqui, Mr. Bijoy Kumar Pradhan and Mr. Vineeet Ranjan, Advocates RAILWAY BOARD, MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS & ANR ...... RESPONDENTS versus Through: Mr. Rajan Sabharwal, Advocate. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA JUDGMENT SANJEEV NARULA, J1 The... Petitioner has filed the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the legality of the order dated 26th December 2014 passed by Director, Railway Protection Force (hereinafter referred to as RPF), Railway Board, Ministry of Railways, Government of India.2. By the impugned order, Director, RPF has imposed a penalty of withholding 30 percent monthly pension of the... Petitioner for a period of five years under Rule 9 (1) of Railway Services (Pension) Rules, 1993 (hereinafter referred to as ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Nov-27-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:14. h November 2018 Decided on:27. h November 2018 + LPA6632016 & CM APPL. 44465/2016 MOHIT MAHAJAN Through: Mr. .... Appellant Krishnan, Santhosh Advocate. FOUNDATION FOR INNOVATION AND TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER (FITT) & ORS. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rahul Narayan, Advocate for... RESPONDENTS 1 and 2. Mr. Bhagwan Swarup Shukla, CGSC with Mr. Kamaldeep and Mr. Sharvan, Advocates for Respondent 3. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA JUDGMENT Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 26th August, 2016 passed by the learned Single Judge dismissing the Appellants Writ Petition (C) No.7502/2016. This appeal raises important questions of law concerning the interpretation of the word establishment under Section 2(k) of the Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995 (the PWD Act) and Section 47 thereof. LPA No.663/2016 Page 1 of 25 ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Nov-27-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :29. h September, 2018 Pronounced on:27. h November, 2018 Crl.A.1151/2014 + LEYSLIENER ZANDILE LUTHULI ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Inderjeet Sidhu, Adv.(DHCLSC) versus DIRECTORATE OF REVENUE INTELLIGENCE Through: Mr. Satish Aggarwala, ..... Respondent Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT The impugned judgment, dated 12th February, 2014, of the 1. learned Special Judge (NDPS), convicts the appellant of having committed an offence punishable under Section 21(c) of the Narcotics, Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as the NDPS Act). The subsequent order on sentence, dated 17thFebruary, 2014, sentences her, for the said offence, to rigorous imprisonment of 10 years and a fine of 1 lakh.2. The law, as it has developed over time, entitles the appellant to acquittal. I do not intend, therefore, to burden this judgment with more facts than are necessary to understand the controversy ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Nov-26-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Reserved on:12. 07.2018 Pronounced on:26. 11.2018 ITA No.90/2004 M/S MATHUR MARKETING PVT. LTD. ..... Appellant Through : Ms. Shashi M. Kapila, Mr. Pravesh Sharma, Mr. Siddarath Kapila and Mr. Sushil Kumar, Advs. versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DELHI & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Sr. Standing Counsel. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.CHAWLA S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.1. By this judgment, we propose to dispose of an appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereafter the Act). The original order, disposing of the appeal, was of 17 January, 2006. That order was carried in appeal by special leave, to the Supreme Court, which disposed of the petition, in the following terms:"We have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the impugned order. Vide order dated 10.08.2017, this Court had permitted the appellant to examine as to whether the oral arguments were advanc...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Nov-20-2018
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:19. 09.2018 Judgment pronounced on:20. 11.2018 ARB. P. No.213/2018 REGANIA HOTELS AND RESORS PVT. LTD. ..Petitioner Through: Ms. Anusuya Salwan with Mr. Vikas Sood and Mr. Nikhil Mehta, Advs. Versus DELHI TOURISM AND TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION Respondent Through: Mr. R.K. Dhawan with Ms. Richa Dhawan, Mr. Anuj Chaturvedi and Mr. V.K. Teng, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.Backdrop 1. This is a petition preferred under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (in short 1996 Act). The petitioners prayer for appointment of an Arbitrator arises in the background of following broad facts.2. The respondent, it appears, had constructed a Coffee Home, albeit, on a temporary structure, which was operated by it till 2006. On account of financial losses suffered by the respondent while operating the Coffee Home, a decision was taken to issue a licence to a private entity f...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Nov-20-2018
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P. (ENF) (COMM) 67/2018 Reserved on:08. 10.2018 Date of decision :20. 11.2018 SHIV SINGH AMAR SINGH Through Ms.Pragya Sharma, Adv. ..... Decree Holder NTPC LTD versus Through Mr.R.K. Joshi, Mr.Jyotinder ..... Judgment Debtor CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA Kumar and Mr.Ojusya Joshi,Advs.1. The present petition has been filed under Section 36 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the 1996 Act) as amended by the Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2015 (hereinafter referred to as the Amending Act), seeking enforcement of the Arbitral Award dated 25.05.2017 passed by the Sole Arbitrator adjudicating the disputes that have arisen between the parties in relation to the Letter of Award dated 26.03.1984 whereby the respondent had awarded the work of Structural Steel Package Part II (3X500 MW Units) Karim Nagar District, Andhra Pradesh to the petitioner.2. Counsel for the respondent has raised...
Tag this Judgment!