Court : Kerala
Decided on : Jan-25-1982
Reported in : 1983CriLJ393
ORDERT. Chandrasekhara Menon, J.1. The petitioner who is a resident of Bombay City seeks in this writ petition to quash the order of detention passed against him by the State of Kerala, the 2nd respondent herein (the 1st respondent being the Home Secretary, Government of Kerala) under the provisions of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974, on 29th April, 1980, with a further and consequential prayer to prohibit the two respondents from executing the said order. The petitioner is working in his father's concern M/s. Shantilal Kalidas Chokshi & Co., Gold and Silver Merchants, at Bombay.2. Petitioner's case:2nd November, 1979, the petitioner had been to Kolhapur to a firm by name Rathod Arts at Kolhapur. From there, at the suggestion of the said Rathod, for disposal of 120 kgs. of silver ornaments which he had taken from Bombay for sale, the petitioner proceeded to Bhatkal by car. He was not successful in selling the ornaments there. From B...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Decided on : Feb-03-1982
Reported in : 1982(II)KLT440
U.L. Bhat, J.1. These two writ petitions are filed challenging an order dated 5-1-1980 in C. P. Nos. 480 of 1976 and 71 of 1978 passed by the Labour Court, Koz kode under Section 33C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (for short the Act).2. The petitioner in O.P. No. 566 of 1980 was working as the Manager of the Tellicherry branch of the North Malabar District Co-operative Supply and Marketing Society Limited, Calicut (for short the 'Society') (Petitioner in O.P. No. 1117 of 1980 and the first respondent in O.P. No. 566 of 1980). The petitioner in O.P. No. 566 of 1980 and the petitioner in O.P. No. 1117 of 1980 will be referred to herein as the petitioner and the first respondent-Society respectively. While so, the first respondent reverted the petitioner as Inspector. The petitioner filed an arbitration case before the Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies challenging the order of reversion and obtained an order of stay. On the strength of the stay order he continued in offi...
Tag this Judgment!