Court : Kerala
Decided on : Jul-10-1957
Reported in : AIR1958Ker164
Kaman Nayar, J.1. The petitioner before us was, and claims that he still is, the president of the Pathanamthitta Union of the Aruvipuram Sri Narayana Dharma Paripalana Yogam (better known by its abbreviated title of the S. N. D. P. Yogam), a body incorporated under Tranvancore Regulation I of 1063 (Indian Companies Act VI of 1882). A copy of the articles of association. In other words of the rules of the Yogam, has been produced and has been marked as Ext. P-l.They contemplate the establishment of a large number of branches: unions are group organisations of the branches; and both the branches and the unions are of course, subordinate to the Yogam and subject to its control. On 20-7-1955, the General Secretary of the Yogam, acting on behalf of its Council sent the petitioner the notice, (Ex. P-3) asking him to show cause against disciplinary action for having worked against the interests of the Yogam.The charge was based on two documents appended to the notice, the first Ex. P-4 dated ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Decided on : Sep-17-1957
Reported in : AIR1958Ker109
Raman Nayar, J.1. The appellant in this case, the Shri Themmalapuram Bus Transport Ltd., Palghat, is a bus operator. By his order, Ext. A dated 21-9-1955, the 1st respondent, the Regional Transport Officer, Kozhikode, suspended the permit of a bus belonging to the appellant company under Section 60 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939. The suspension was for a period of 45 days and the order said that it was with effect from 25th October, 1955. Against this order the company appealed, and, on 12-10-1955, before the date specified in Ext. A as the date on which the suspension was to commence, it obtained a stay from the appellate authority the Secretary, Central Road Traffic Board, Madras, whose successor, the Secretary, Central Road Traffic Board, Trivandrum, is the 2nd respondent to this appeal.On 27-12-1955 by his order Ext. B, the appellate authority dismissed the appeal without saying anything about the date on which the suspension was to commence, and on 2-2-1956 the company filed a pe...
Tag this Judgment!