Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : May-25-1988
Reported in : AIR1988P& H281
V. Ramaswami, C.J.1. In C. W. P. 736 of 1987, the petitioners. who are the tenants of the ground floor portion of H. N. 2135, Sector 38-C. Chandigarh. have filed this writ petition praying for quashing of the Notification No. GSR-1287(E) dated December 15, 1986 by which the Central Government in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 87 of the Punjab Reorganisation Act. 1966(Act No. 31 of 1966) have extended to the Union Territory of Chandigarh the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction (Amendment) Act. 1983, (Punjab Act 2 of 1985) as in force in the State of Punjab at the date of the notification subject to the modifications mentioned in the said notification. This Amendment Act 2 of 1985, which was extended to the Union Territory of Chandigarh incorporated Section 13-A in the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act 3 of 1949, which conferred certain special rights in favour of 'specified landlord' which expression means 'a person who is entitled to receive rent in respect of a buildi...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Oct-14-1988
Reported in : [1990]69CompCas556(P& H)
G.R. Majithia, J.1. Petition under Section 633(2) of the Companies Act, 1956, has been moved by Prestolite of India Ltd., through its managing director and directors, seeking the following reliefs :(a) That the petitioners be excused and relieved from all proceedings criminal in nature including that of F. I. R. No. 143 of 1981, F. I. R. No. 134 of 1982 and F. I. R. No. 39 of 1983 in respect of the alleged non-deposit of the contributions of the employees' shares and stay further proceedings pending in the court of Miss Raj Rani, Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Faridabad, in respect of the said FIRs ; (b) stop all other proceedings pending with the Collector, Faridabad, for recovery of employer's shares of provident funds/ESI and also stayfurther proceedings at the hands, of Regional Director, Employees' State Insurance Corporation, for the alleged contravention of the ESI Act and the Scheme framed thereunder and/or any contravention of the Income-tax Act with reference to the tax deduc...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Nov-30-1988
Reported in : AIR1989P& H245
J.V. Gupta, J. 1. This case has come up before us, on a reference by the learned single Judge as there were two conflicting decisions of this Court in the Lalru Co-operative Agricultural Service Society Ltd., Lalru v. Patiala District Wholesale Co-operative Supply and Marketing Society, 1979 Pun LJ 66 and the Pandhwa Co-op. Agricultural Service Society v. Sukdev Singh, 1979 Pun LJ 287. The controversy between the parties is; whether the award given by the Arbitrator under the Punjab Co-operative Societies Act, 1961, (hereinafter called the Act) can be held to be a nullity by the executing Court if it is a non-speaking one?2. In the present case, there was an award in favour of the Hoshiarpur Central Cooperative Bank Ltd. for a sum of RS. 35,311.70. When the execution of the said award was being sought, objections were filed on behalf of the judgment-debtor alleging that the award was void, illegal and invalid; hence it could not be executed. According to the judgment-debtor, no notice ...
Tag this Judgment!