Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: delhi rent control act 1958 repealed section 12 limitation for application for fixation of standard rent Court: punjab and haryana Year: 1958 Page 1 of about 1 results (0.103 seconds)

Dec 23 1958 (HC)

Raj Kishan JaIn Vs. Tulsi Dass Etc.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Dec-23-1958

Reported in : AIR1959P& H291

..... ganj, delhi. each portion consists of four flats and each flat has been given on rent to a different tenant. thus eight, tenants occupy this building. on the application of some of the tenants for fixation of standard rent under section 7a read with schedule iv of the delhi and aimer merwara rent control act, 1947, the controller fixed the rent at rs ..... superintendence is conferred on high courts. section 8(1) of the general clauses act which only reproduces section 8(1) of the english interpretation act with suitable verbal changes reads :'8. construction of references to repealed enactments : (1) where this act, or any central act or regulation made after the commencement of this act, repeals and re-enacts, with or without ..... writs in the nature of habeas corpus, mandamus, prohibition, quo warranto and certioran, or any of them, for the enforcement of any of the rights conferred by part xii and for any other purpose. (2) the power conferred on a high court by clause (1) shall not be in derogation of the power conferred on the ..... 1958 sc 398, wherein it has been laid down:'the powers of judicial interference under article 227 with orders of judicial or quasi-judicial nature are not greater than the powers under article 226. under article 226, the power of interference may extend to quashing an impugned order on the ground of a mistake apparent on the face of the record. but under article 227 the power of interference is limited to seeing that the tribunal functions within the limits .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 22 1958 (HC)

Nasir Ahmed Vs. the Chief Commissioner, Delhi and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Sep-22-1958

Reported in : AIR1959P& H261

ORDERBishan Narain, J.1. On 19-5-1957 a notice on behalf of the Delhi State was issued under Section 3(2)(c) of the Foreigners' Act, 1946 read with Foreigners Laws (Amendment) Ordinance, 1957 whereby the Chief Commissioner directed Nasir Ahmad, his wife Mrs. Aziz Fatima and their minor daughter not to remain in India after the expiry of three days from the date on which the notice is served on them and shall not thereafter re-enter India. This notice was issued on the ground that Nasir Ahmad, his wife and their minor daughter were Pakistani nationals.Nasir Ahmad thereupon filed this petition on (31-5-1957, under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the validity of this order on the ground that the petitioner, his wife and their miner daughter were not Pakistani nationals. The petitioner in this petition has alleged that besides himself, his wife and their minor daughter, the petitioner has four other children residing with him in Delhi. He has also alleged that they were all bor...

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 08 1958 (HC)

F. Nanak Chand Ramkishan Das and ors. Vs. Lal Chand Ganeshi Lal and or ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-08-1958

Reported in : AIR1958P& H222

K.L. Gosain, J.1. This second appeal is directed against the appellate decree of Shri Maharaj Kishore, District Judge, Hissar, confirming the decree of Shri P.K. Thukral, Sub-Judge 1st Class, Gur-gaon, by which the suit of the plaintin-appellants was dismissed on 18-5-1949.2. Lal Chand and his sons Prabhu Dayal and Chuni Lal constituted a joint Hindu family and carried on their business under the name and style of Messrs. Lal Chand Prabhu Dayal at Hodel, Tehsil Palwal. On 30-5-1943 Prabhu Dayal acting as karta & manager Of the family gave a hundi to the plaintiff-firm Nanak Chand Bam Kishan Of Hodel for a sum of Rs. 5,894/4/- drawn on Messrs: Manohar Lal Ram Parshad of Hailey Mandl, Pataudi, and obtained from the plaintiffs a sum of Rs. 5,879/4/-, i.e., the amount covered by the hundi less commission at the rate of -/4/- per cent.As collateral security for the amount of the hundi the defendants also handed over to the plaintiffs one railway receipt under which 154 bags of matra and 50 ...

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //