Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Mar-10-2016
(Prayer: These Writ Petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to declare that the land acquisition proceedings initiated against the schedule lands belonging to the petitioners have been lapsed by virtue of the coming into force of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. These Writ Petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to quash the award dated 30.4.2010 in respect of Sy.No.70/7 measuring 14 guntas of Bomanahalli Village, Begur Hobli, Bangalore South Taluk is concerned vide Annexure-D and etc; This Writ Petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to declare that the preliminary notification dated 7.11.2002 [Annexure-H] issued under Section 17[1] of the BDA Act and the final notification dated 9.9.2003 [Annexure-J] issued in so far as the schedule property is concerned under Section 19[1] of the BDA Ac...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Mar-10-2016
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE10H DAY OF MARCH2016 BEFORE: THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY WRIT PETITION Nos.38868-38870 OF2015(LA-UDA) CONNECTED WITH WRIT PETITION Nos.38871-38874 OF2015(LA-UDA) WRIT PETITION Nos.35858 AND3588035881 OF2013(LA- BDA) WRIT PETITION No.82 OF2015(LA-BDA) WRIT PETITION Nos.26980-26982 OF2015(LA-BDA) WRIT PETITION No.83 OF2015(LA-BDA) WRIT PETITION Nos.15616-15620 OF2013(LA-UDA) WRIT PETITION No.40076 OF2014(LA-BDA) IN W.P. Nos.38868-38870 OF2015BETWEEN:1. 2. Smt. K.M.Chikkathayamma, Wife of D. Ramu, Aged about 58 years, Sri. R. Krishna, Son of D. Ramu, 2 Aged about 34 years, Smt. R. Hema, Daughter of D. Ramu, Aged about 32 years, Smt. Parimala, Daughter of D. Ramu, Aged about 26 years, Sri. R. Umesha, Son of D. Ramu, Aged about 29 years, Smt. T. Renuka, Wife of Late D. Papanna, Aged about 44 years, T. Preethi, Daughter of Late D. Papanna, Aged about 23 years, 3.4. 5.6. 7.8. 9.10. P. Sunil, P. Kiran, Son of Late D. Papann...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Jun-21-2016
(Prayers: This writ petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to quash the endorsement dated 09.07.2012 at Annex-N, issued by the R-2 and direct the respondents to reconsider the representation at Annex-L, given by the petitioners in the light of the final report of investigation submitted by the CID at Annex-J, vide covering letter dated 09.04.2012 at Annex-K and direct the respondents to take appropriate steps/actions with regard to the vitiated selection process of 1998, 1999 and 2004, Gazetted Group A and B Posts. This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a writ in the nature of mandamus take corrective action of the recruitments and appointments on the basis of the CID report pertaining to the selection for KAS [Probationers] for the year 1998, 1999 and 2004 as per earlier the recommendations of the K.K.Mishra Committee Report and the final report was submitted on 09.04.2012, vide ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Nov-10-2016
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE10H DAY OF NOVEMBER2016BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAGHVENDRA S. CHAUHAN WRIT PETITION No.30917/2016 & WRIT PETITION Nos.31359-31361/2016 (MV) c/w WRIT PETITION No.30191/2016 (MV) c/w WRIT PETITION Nos.31673-31674/2016 (MV) IN WRIT PETITION No.30917/2016 & WRIT PETITION Nos.31359-31361/2016 BETWEEN:1. SATISH N. S/O. NARAYAN, AGED ABOUT27YEARS, RESIDING AT999 6TH CROSS, 12TH MAIN, RAJENDRA NAGAR, KORAMANGALA, BANGALORE 560047. K. MURALI S/O. K. NARAHARI, AGED ABOUT31YEARS, RESIDING AT:31. NETRAVATHI EXTENSION, DEVASANDRA, K. R. PURAM, BANGALORE 560036.2.3. MOHAMMED RIAZ PASHA S/O. ABDUL GAFFAR, AGED ABOUT47YEARS, RESIDING AT:8. PATEL DOWN, 5TH CROSS, 5TH MAIN ROAD, RAHMAT NAGAR, R. T. NAGAR POST, BANGALORE 560 032. 2 ABHINAYA KHATAVKAR S/O. RAMESH, AGED ABOUT36YEARS, RESIDING AT:67. 6TH A MAIN, 15TH CROSS, J.C. NAGAR, MAHALAKSHMIPURAM, BANGALORE-560086. ... PETITIONERS4 (BY MR. UDAYA HOLLA, SENIOR ADV. FOR MR. VIKAS N. M...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Nov-10-2016
(Prayer: These Writ Petitions are filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to strike down the impugned rules notified dated 2.4.2016 issued by R-1 at Annexure-A as being Ultra Vires of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Violative of Articles 14, 19(1)(G) and 301 of the Constitution of India and etc.This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to quash the Karnataka On-Demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016, produced as Annexure-A.These Writ Petitions are filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India PRAYING to strike down the Karnataka On-Demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016, passed by R-1, notified dated 2.4.2016 produced at Annexure-A as being Ultra Vires of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Violative of Articles 14, 19(1)(G) and 301 of the Constitution of India and etc.) 1. Information Technology, and globalization have revolutionized our lives. The introduc...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Dec-16-2016
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE16H DAY OF DECEMBER2016BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY CRIMINAL APPEAL No.508 OF2014CONNECTED WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL No.308 OF2014IN CRL.A.No.508 OF2014BETWEEN: Marek Jaroslaw Lewandowicz, Son of Zygmnut Lewandowicz, Aged about 45 years, Residing at No.122, Sangkat 3, Mittapheap, Sihanouk Ville, Cambodia. (now in Judicial Custody, Parappana Agrahara Central Prison, Bangalore). APPELLANT (By Shri Chandrashekar R.P., Advocate) 2 AND: Superintendent of Customs, Air Intelligence Unit, Bangalore. (represented by learned Special Public Prosecutor) RESPONDENT (By Shri K.N.Mohan, Special Public Prosecutor Respondent) for ***** This Criminal Appeal filed under Section 374(2) of the code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, by the advocate for the appellant praying to set aside the order dated 30.10.2013 and sentence dated 5.11.2013 passed by the XXXIII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge and Special Judge (NDPS) Bangalore, in...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Oct-17-2016
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE17H DAY OF OCTOBER, 2016 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE A S BOPANNA WRIT PETITION No.15990/2015 (GM-RES) ... PETITIONER BETWEEN: LEESHA D/O DORESWAMY RAJU AGED ABOUT20YEARS NO.47/23, 9TH CROSS PARIMALANAGAR NANDINI LAYOUT BANGALORE-560 096 (BY SRI. SUNIL KUMAR H, ADV.) AND:1. THE SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOME AFFAIRS GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA VIDHANASOUDHA BANGALORE-560 001 2. THE SECRETARY UNION HOME MINISTRY GOVERNMENT OF INDIA NORTH BLOCK CENTRAL SECRETRIAT NEW DELHI-110001 ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. PRABHULINGA K NAVADGI, ADDL.ASG. FOR SMT. ANUPAMA HEGDE, CGC FOR R2 SRI Y D HARSHA, AGA. FOR R1) 2 THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226& 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, WITH A PRAYER TO (1) DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION OF PETITIONER DATED0501.2015 VIDE ANNEX-A AND PROVIDE THE PETITIONER A COMPENSATION OF RS.1 CRORE (ONE CRORE) ALONG WITH INTEREST BY MOULDING A SPECIAL RELIEF TO THE PETITIONER BY TAKING...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Dec-16-2016
(Prayer: This Criminal Appeal filed under Section 374(2) of the code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, by the advocate for the appellant praying to set aside the order dated 30.10.2013 and sentence dated 5.11.2013 passed by the XXXIII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge and Special Judge (NDPS) Bangalore, in Special Case No.137/2010 - convicting the appellant/accused for the offences punishable under Sections 21(C) and 28 of N.D.P.S.Act and the appellant/accused is sentenced to undergo R.I. for 10 years each and pay fine of Rs.1,00,000/- each and in default to undergo S.I. for 1 year each for the offences punishable under Sections 21(C) and 28 of N.D.P.S.Act. Both the substantial sentences shall run concurrently.) 1. These appeals arise out of the same judgment and are disposed of together. The appeal in Crl. A. 508/2014 is filed by accused Marek Jaroslaw Lewandowicz and the appeal in Crl. A. 308/2014 is filed by accused Johann Tuchler. 2. It is the case of the prosecution, that on 27....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Oct-17-2016
(Prayer: This Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, with a prayer to (1) direct the respondents to consider the representation of petitioner dated 05.01.2015 vide Annex-A and provide the petitioner a compensation of Rs.1 crore (one crore) along with interest by moulding a special relief to the petitioner by taking into account her young age, meritorious academic record and disability on par with the amount which would have been awarded to the petitioner under the Fatal Accidents Act or Motor Vehicles Act or Workmen Compensation Act and etc.) 1. Though several prayers are made in the instant petition, at the time of hearing the same is limited to the first and fourth prayers made in the petition and the petitioner seeks consideration in that regard. 2. The case of the petitioner is that she had suffered severe injuries in the bomb blast that occurred on 17.04.2013 at 11th Cross, Malleswaram, Bangalore, near the office of the Bharathiya Janatha Party....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Jul-04-2016
(This WP is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to quash the impugned decision/order vide final order dated 22.07.2015 passed in appeal No.ST/21725/2014-DB by the Ld. CESTAT, Bangalore impugned in this petition vide Annex-H). Jayant Patel, J. 1. Leave to challenge the order dated 31-12-12 passed by the Commissioner of Service Tax. 2. Mr. Neeralgi, learned Counsel takes notice for the respondent. With the consent of the learned Counsel appearing for both the sides, appeal is finally heard. 3. The present appeal is directed against the order dated 31-12-12 Annexure F passed by the Commissioner of Service Tax, as well as the order dated 22-7-15 passed by the CESTAT, whereby the Tribunal for the reasons recorded in the order has not interfered with the order of the first appellate authority, since the outer limit of limitation was over. 4. We have heard Mr. N. Anand, the learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Jeevan J. Neeralgi, the learned Senior Cent...
Tag this Judgment!