Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: delhi rent control act 1958 repealed section 12 limitation for application for fixation of standard rent Court: karnataka Year: 1983

Nov 07 1983 (HC)

Sudarshan Trading Company Limited vs D'Sauza

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Nov-07-1983

Reported in : AIR1984Kant214; 1984(2)KarLJ132

Venkatachaliah, J. 1. Appellant, M/s. Sudarshan Trading Company Limited, is aggrieved by the judgment and decree D/-19-4-1983 made in Original Suit No. 3091 of 1980, on the file of the 10th Addl. City Civil Judge, Bangalore, decreeing the respondent plaintiff's suit for ejectment and granting an order for possession. This appeal is in the list of admission cases. It is admitted and with the consent of learned Counsel on both sides taken up for final hearing, and disposed of by this judgment 2. Respondent, Mrs. L. D'Souza, is the owner of premises No. 11, C. J. D'Souza Road, Civil Station, Bangalore, and appellant is the tenant. Letting is for non-residential purposes. On 26-12-1974, after an earlier lease for 3 years had come to an end, a fresh lease deed dated 26-12-1974, Ext. P. 1, was entered into between the parties. The term mentioned in Ext. P.1 was three years from 1-8-1974. Rent was Rs. 2,300/- per month. The period of 3 years under Ext. P. I having run out, respondent issued n...

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 09 1983 (HC)

Sri Padmamba Large Sized Co-operative Society Vs. Labour Court and anr ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-09-1983

Reported in : ILR1985KAR50

ORDERMalimath, A.C.J.1. The appellant is a Cooperative Society registered under the Karnataka Cooperative Societies Act, 1959 (hereinafter referred to as the Act). The 3rd respondent was a salesman working under theAppellant Society. The 3rd respondent was dismissed from service with effect from 511-1973 by the appellant. The dispute raised by the 3rd respondent was referred by the State Government to the Labour Court to decide as to whether the management was justified in dismissing the workman and as to the relief which the workman is entitled to. The Labour Court made an Award on the11th of January 1980 holding that the dismissal was not justified and directing reinstatement of the 3rd respondent workman in service with effect from 6th November 1978 with continuity of service and back wages.2. The appellant challenged the said Award before this Court in W.P. No 8011 of 1980. On the11th of November 1980 Justice Bopanna, before whom the Writ Petition came up for consideration, allowed...

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //