Court : Gujarat
Reported in : (1986)2GLR910
..... be equated with the industrial workers. the court, however, cautioned that this must not be interpreted to be a universal proposition. the actual decision in the university of delhi case (supra), as pointed out in bangalore water supply's case (supra) rested on the ground that the predominant activity of the university was teaching, and since teachers ..... placed at the disposal of the institute the properties of the foundation worth about rs. 30,00,000/- without any corresponding obligation on the institute to pay the rent or charges for their permissive use. the charity commissioner has recorded in his order framing the scheme in scheme application no. 1 of 1980 as under:i have ..... the b.m. institute is housed in the properties owned by the nirmala bakubhai foundation and the parent institution or the trust does not charge a pie as rent. in other words the b.m. institute is being run or housed in the immovable properties of considerable value owned by the public trust, known as nirmala .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Gujarat
Reported in : (1968)9GLR694
..... succession, survivorship, inheritance, partition, purchase, mortgage, gift, lease or otherwise, any right as holder, occupant, owner, mortgagee, landlord or tenant of the land, or assignee of the rent or revenue thereof, shall report orally or in writing his acquisition of such right to the village accountant within three months from the date of such acquisition, and the said ..... contain. they are, (a) the names of all persons (other than tenants) who are holders, occupants, owners or mortgagees of the land or assignees of the rent or revenue thereof; (b) the nature and extent of the respective interests of such persons and the conditions or liabilities (if any) attaching thereto; (c) the ..... rent or revenue (if any) payable by or to any of such persons; (d) such other particulars as the state may prescribe by rules made in this behalf. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Gujarat
Reported in : 1979CENCUS404D; (1980)GLR284; (1980)GLR825
..... validity. mr. bhatt has, in this context, invited our attention to the observations made by the supreme court in mohinder singh gill and anr. v. the chief election commissioner, new delhi and ors. : [1978]2scr272 . they were made in the context of the representation of the people act, 1951 and are as follows:when a statutory functionary maks an order based ..... be said that it is totally irrelevant and inapplicable to the question which we are called upon to answer we think not.11. in union of india and anr. v. delhi cloth and general mills co. ltd. : 1973ecr56(sc) , the supreme court has laid down that the excise duty is a tax on the manufacture of goods and not on their .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Gujarat
Reported in : (1967)8GLR729
P.N. Bhagwati, J.1. These petitions challenge the validity of acquisitions made by the Government of Gujarat for the construction of Gandhinagar, the new capital of Gujarat. The facts giving rise to the petitions are identical barring only the difference in the survey numbers of the lands sought to be acquired and the dates of the notifications issued under Sections 4 and 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, acquiring such lands and it will, therefore, be sufficient to state the facts of Petition No. 1003 of 1965 which has been heard as the main petition and in which the arguments have been principally advanced. The petitioner in this petition owned at all material times several lands bearing different Survey numbers situate in village Pethapur, Taluka Gandhinagar, District Gandhinagar. By a notification dated 10th March 1965 issued under Section 4 of the Act, the Government notified that the said lands were likely to be needed for the public purpose, namely, construction of proposed G...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Gujarat
Reported in : (1974)ILLJ1Guj
..... . the question as to revision must be examined on the merits in each individual case that is brought before an adjudicator for his adjudication'. recently in shahdara (delhi) shaharanpur light railway co. ltd. v. shahdara (delhi) saharanpur light railway workers' union, [1939 - i l.l.j. 734], speaking for the supreme court, shelat, j., candidly said that with the constant spiralling ofi .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Gujarat
..... . in considering the effect of the document we must enquire whether it contains unqualified and unconditional words of present demise and includes the essential terms of a lease. generally if rent is made payable under an agreement from the date of its execution or other specified date, it may be said to create a present demise. another relevant test is the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Gujarat
Reported in : (2003)2GLR1190
C.K. Buch, J. 1. This group of petitions are filed in the matter of appointment on the post of Lecturers in Government Colleges invoking the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 in special reference to Articles 14 & 16 of the Constitution of India, Scope of further division of these group matters is positively there on set of facts, but notionally it can be said that these petitions are moved by two rival groups viz., one group is of candidates who are selected by Gujarat Public Service Commission ('G.P.S.C.' for short) for the post of Lecturer awaiting appointment. Another group is of those Lecturers who have been appointed as Lecturers on an ad hoc basis till regularly selected candidates by G.P.S.C. are made available. Those petitioners who have been selected by G.P.S.C. for the post of Lecturers have prayed for a writ of mandamus for issuance of directions to the Government to appoint them on the post of Lecturers. The other group is of Lecturers already appointed on ad hoc...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Gujarat
..... pregnancy. the court after considering various us supreme court judgments regarding pregnant women held that the observations made therein would apply to the domestic cases. 12. in municipal corporation of delhi v. female workers (muster roll) and anr. [(2000) 3 scc 224], the short question which was to be decided by this court was whether having regard to the provisions contained .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Gujarat
Reported in : [1995]84CompCas230(Guj)
S.D. Shah, J.1. Mafatlal Industries Limited (hereinafter referred to as 'MIL' for brevity) is the transferee company, which has moved this petition for sanction of this court to the scheme of amalgamation of Mafatlal Fine Spinning and . (hereinafter referred to as 'MFL' for brevity), the transferor company under section 391(2) of the Companies Act, 1956. * * * * 2. The transferor company, MFL, is proposed to be amalgamated with the petitioner company under the following circumstances and for the following reasons : (1) The proposed amalgamation will pave the way for better, more efficient and economic control in the running of operations. (2) Economies in administrative and management costs will improve in combined profitability. (3) The amalgamated company will have the benefit of the combined reserves, manufacturing assets, manpower and cash flows of the two companies. The combined technological, managerial and financial resources are expected to enhance the capability of the amalg...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Gujarat
Reported in : AIR1961Guj151; (1961)2GLR343
Bhagwati, J.1. This Second Appeal raises a question of considerable importance regarding proprietary rights in lands granted by Rulers of Indian States before the merger of those States with the Dominion of India and the effect of the merger on such proprietary rights. Several arguments have been addressed to us relating to different aspects of this question and the arguments have been both able and ingenious. In order to understand and appreciate these arguments, it is necessary to set out the facts giving rise to this appeal. The facts are not many and may be briefly stated as follows:2. Prior to 15th August 1947, the Sant State was an independent native State under the paramountcy of the British Crown. On 15th August 1947, India obtained independence and became a Dominion by reason of the Indian Independence Act, 1947. At the same time, the sovereignty of the British Crown over the Indian States lapsed by reason of Section 7 of that Act and as a result thereof, the Sant State became...
Tag this Judgment!