Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Sep-26-2023
REPORTABLE2023NSC857 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 7175 OF2021CPL ASHISH KUMAR CHAUHAN (RETD.) APPELLANT(S) VERSUS COMMANDING OFFICER & ORS. RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.1. The present civil appeal challenges an order of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi1 (hereafter, Commission). The application by CPL Ashish Kumar Chauhan (hereafter, appellant) for compensation was dismissed by the Commission. The Commanding Officer, 171 Military Hospital is arrayed as the first Respondent; the Medical Officer at the 171 Military Hospital (171 MH) is the second respondent; the Principal Director, Directorate of Air Veterans is impleaded as the third respondent; the Commanding Officer of the South Western Air Command (Gandhinagar HQ) is arrayed as fourth respondent, and the Senior Medical Officer at the said Military facility is impleaded as the fifth respondent. The first, second and fifth 1 In Consumer Compla...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Oct-17-2023
..... section 30(ii) of the tamil nadu buildings (lease and rent) control act, 1960 was under challenge, this court held that the provision which exempted tenants of residential buildings paying monthly rent of more than rs 400 from the protection of the said rent control act, whereas no such restriction was imposed in respect of tenants of non-residential buildings under the said act ..... despite the opposition to atypical marriages and has not chosen to repeal the sma or otherwise exclude the celebration of inter- caste marriages under personal ..... s. ravindra bhat]. .....................................................................j.[hima kohli]. new delhi; october17 2023 reportable in the supreme court of india civil ..... female at birth) who worked at a factory in ajmer: you ask if i have heard the word lesbian ..... sex parents. the paper titled high school graduation rates among children of same-sex households 268 uses the ..... degrees of relationships or are in a consanguineous relationship.234. principle 24 of the yogyakarta principles (on the application of international human rights ..... taken away except through a law which is substantively and procedurally fair, just and reasonable. intrinsic to the liberty which the constitution guarantees ..... democratic is not an argument that is specific to the issues 76 5 us137(1803) 77 (1952) 1 scc41078 1950 scc43678 part d which have been raised before ..... most religions and communities. the age of consent for girls was fixed at ten years in 1860. in 1890, a thirty .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Oct-19-2023
1 REPORTABLE2023INSC928IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 1420 OF2023ASSESSING OFFICER CIRCLE (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) 2(2)(2) NEW DELHI APPELLANT(S) VERSUS M/S NESTLE SA RESPONDENT(S) WITH Civil Appeal No.1423/2023, Civil Appeal No.1421-1422/2023, Civil Appeal No.1424/2023, Civil Appeal No.1425/2018, Civil Appeal No.1426/2023, Civil Appeal No.1427/2023, Civil Appeal No.1428/2023, Civil Appeal No.1429/2023, Civil Appeal No.1430/2023, Civil Appeal No.1431/2023, Civil Appeal No.1432/2023 JUDGMENT S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.Table of Contents I. Facts...........................................................................................................................2 II. Arguments of parties..................................................................................................6 A. Revenues contentions.........................................................................................................6 B. Contentions of the assessees...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Dec-11-2023
..... provinces were placed in part ii. part ii included the states of delhi, ajmer-mewara including panth piploda, and coorg. part iii consisted ..... act of parliament, cannot be referred to for the purpose of construing the statute. 241 at any rate, there can be no justification for restricting the section by the marginal note,242 and the marginal note cannot certainly control the meaning of the body of the section ..... subordinate to the constitution of india, nor to article 370. it cannot be substituted or repealed by an act of the union government49; d. this court has recognised that internal sovereignty ..... shall be terminated and; c. the head of state shall be elected.147. in 1952, the delhi agreement was entered into between the government of india and the government of jammu and kashmir. in terms of ..... . the sacred shrines of both the communities are situated close together and often fairs at these shrines are also held on the same date, with ..... entries 4287, 11288 and 35289 were made applicable.450. on 24 november 1966, co74was issued as a consequence of which the constitution as in ..... provisions for the rajpramukh to be entitled to use their residence without the payment of rent and that the rajpramukh shall be paid such allowances as the president may by general ..... fixed for its expiration or the date on which it would have expired if this constitution had not come into force. explanation iv.-an ordinance promulgated by the governor of a province under section 88 of the government of india act .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Mar-02-2023
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.104 OF2015ANOOP BARANWAL PETITIONER VERSUS UNION OF INDIA RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION(CIVIL) No.1043 OF2017WRIT PETITION(CIVIL) NO.569 OF2021AND WRIT PETITION(CIVIL) NO.998 OF2022JUDGMENT K.M. JOSEPH, J.INDEX A. THE CASES: THE FOUR WRIT PETITIONS ......................................................................................... 3 B. THE SUBMISSIONS OF THE PETITIONERS; SHRI GOPAL SANKARANARAYANAN, LEARNED SENIOR COUNSEL IN WRIT PETITION (C) No.1043 OF2017............................................................................... 7 C. SUBMISSIONS ON BEHALF OF SHRI PRASHANT BHUSHAN, LEARNED COUNSEL ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER IN WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.104 OF2015 .................................................................... 11 D. SUBMISSIONS BY SHRI JAYA THAKUR, PETITIONER IN WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.998 OF202216 E. SUBMISSIONS OF SHRI KALEESWARAM RAJ, LEARNED COUNSEL FOR THE I...
Tag this Judgment!