Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: delhi and ajmer rent control act 1952 repealed section 24 fixing of fair rate Year: 2012 Page 1 of about 7 results (0.084 seconds)

Mohammed Ajmal Mohammad Amir Kasab Alias Abu Mujahid and Others Vs. St ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : (2012)9SCC1; JT2012(8)SC4; 2012(4)KCCR271(SN); 2012AIRSCW4942; AIR2012SC3565; 2012(7)SCALE553

Aftab Alam, J.1. The appellant, Mohammed Ajmal Mohammad Amir Kasab @ Abu Mujahid (hereinafter referred to as ‘the appellant’ or as ‘Kasab’), who is a Pakistani national, has earned for himself five death penalties and an equal number of life terms in prison for committing multiple crimes of a horrendous kind in this country. Some of the major charges against him were: conspiracy to wage war against the Government of India; collecting arms with the intention of waging war against the Government of India; waging and abetting the waging of war against the Government of India; commission of terrorist acts; criminal conspiracy to commit murder; criminal conspiracy, common intention and abetment to commit murder; committing murder of a number of persons; attempt to murder with common intention; criminal conspiracy and abetment; abduction for murder; robbery/dacoity with an attempt to cause death or grievous hurt; and causing explosions punishable under the Explosive S...

Tata Motors Limited and anr. Vs. the State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

..... section 23 and section 24 of the land acquisition act in open court and waited for the states consent on the next date.80. he further pointed out that even the statement which was made by the learned advocate general on the next date was not straight or fair ..... petitioner paid permits and the costs of registration. the petitioner paid lease rent annually as well as all municipal and panchayet rates and taxes and other outgoings. the writ petitioner admittedly commenced the establishment of a factory ..... time any law with respect to the same matter including a law adding to, amending, varying or repealing the law so made by the legislature of the state.115. according to mr. pal if repugnancy exists ..... substantive law or principles before him.143. mr. pal referred to the decision of delhi transport corporation (supra) and submitted that it may also be characterized as excessive delegation ..... decisions of aswini kumar ghose & anr. vs. arabinda bose & anr. reported in air 1952 sc 369; rakhal chandra basak vs. the secretary for india in council reported ..... the question pertains to the adequacy of compensation, it is not justiciable; if the compensation fixed or the principles evolved for fixing it disclose that the legislature made the law in fraud of powers in the sense we ..... ajmer reported in air 1959 475], transfer to tenant in possession by way of compulsory purchase of all lands not required by the land holder for their personal cultivation, distribution of the ownership and control .....

State Vs. Mohd. Naushad and ors

Court : Delhi

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON:18. 05.2012 PRONOUNCED ON:22. 11.2012 + DEATH SENTENCE REF. 2/2010 STATE Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Pawan Sharma, Standing Counsel (Crl), for the State with Mr. Harsh Prabhakar, Advocate. Versus MOHD. NAUSHAD & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. K.K. Manan with Mr. Mustafa Arif, Advocates. Ms. Kamini Jaiswal with Mr. Abhimanue Shrestha, Advocates for A-5, 6 & 9. CRL.A. 948/2010, CRL. M. (BAIL) 1121/2010 JAVED AHMED KHAN @ CHHOTA JAVED ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Kamini Jaiswal with Mr. Abhimanue Shrestha, Advocate. versus THE STATE Through: Death Sent.2/10; Crl.A.948 to 951/10 ..... Respondent Mr. Pawan Sharma, Standing Counsel (Crl), for the State with Mr. Harsh Prabhakar, Advocate. Page 1 CRL.A. 949/2010 MOHD. NAUSHAD Through: ..... Appellant Mr. K.K. Manan with Mr. Mustafa Arif, Advocates. Versus THE STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Pawan Sharma, Standing Counsel (Crl), for the State with Mr. Harsh Prabhakar, Advocate. CR...

Javed Ahmed Khan @ Chhota Javed Vs. the State

Court : Delhi

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON:18. 05.2012 PRONOUNCED ON:22. 11.2012 + DEATH SENTENCE REF. 2/2010 STATE Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Pawan Sharma, Standing Counsel (Crl), for the State with Mr. Harsh Prabhakar, Advocate. Versus MOHD. NAUSHAD & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. K.K. Manan with Mr. Mustafa Arif, Advocates. Ms. Kamini Jaiswal with Mr. Abhimanue Shrestha, Advocates for A-5, 6 & 9. CRL.A. 948/2010, CRL. M. (BAIL) 1121/2010 JAVED AHMED KHAN @ CHHOTA JAVED ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Kamini Jaiswal with Mr. Abhimanue Shrestha, Advocate. versus THE STATE Through: Death Sent.2/10; Crl.A.948 to 951/10 ..... Respondent Mr. Pawan Sharma, Standing Counsel (Crl), for the State with Mr. Harsh Prabhakar, Advocate. Page 1 CRL.A. 949/2010 MOHD. NAUSHAD Through: ..... Appellant Mr. K.K. Manan with Mr. Mustafa Arif, Advocates. Versus THE STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Pawan Sharma, Standing Counsel (Crl), for the State with Mr. Harsh Prabhakar, Advocate. CR...

Mohd. Naushad Vs. the State

Court : Delhi

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON:18. 05.2012 PRONOUNCED ON:22. 11.2012 + DEATH SENTENCE REF. 2/2010 STATE Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Pawan Sharma, Standing Counsel (Crl), for the State with Mr. Harsh Prabhakar, Advocate. Versus MOHD. NAUSHAD & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. K.K. Manan with Mr. Mustafa Arif, Advocates. Ms. Kamini Jaiswal with Mr. Abhimanue Shrestha, Advocates for A-5, 6 & 9. CRL.A. 948/2010, CRL. M. (BAIL) 1121/2010 JAVED AHMED KHAN @ CHHOTA JAVED ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Kamini Jaiswal with Mr. Abhimanue Shrestha, Advocate. versus THE STATE Through: Death Sent.2/10; Crl.A.948 to 951/10 ..... Respondent Mr. Pawan Sharma, Standing Counsel (Crl), for the State with Mr. Harsh Prabhakar, Advocate. Page 1 CRL.A. 949/2010 MOHD. NAUSHAD Through: ..... Appellant Mr. K.K. Manan with Mr. Mustafa Arif, Advocates. Versus THE STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Pawan Sharma, Standing Counsel (Crl), for the State with Mr. Harsh Prabhakar, Advocate. CR...

Mohd. Ali Bhatt @ Kille Vs. the State

Court : Delhi

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON:18. 05.2012 PRONOUNCED ON:22. 11.2012 + DEATH SENTENCE REF. 2/2010 STATE Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Pawan Sharma, Standing Counsel (Crl), for the State with Mr. Harsh Prabhakar, Advocate. Versus MOHD. NAUSHAD & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. K.K. Manan with Mr. Mustafa Arif, Advocates. Ms. Kamini Jaiswal with Mr. Abhimanue Shrestha, Advocates for A-5, 6 & 9. CRL.A. 948/2010, CRL. M. (BAIL) 1121/2010 JAVED AHMED KHAN @ CHHOTA JAVED ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Kamini Jaiswal with Mr. Abhimanue Shrestha, Advocate. versus THE STATE Through: Death Sent.2/10; Crl.A.948 to 951/10 ..... Respondent Mr. Pawan Sharma, Standing Counsel (Crl), for the State with Mr. Harsh Prabhakar, Advocate. Page 1 CRL.A. 949/2010 MOHD. NAUSHAD Through: ..... Appellant Mr. K.K. Manan with Mr. Mustafa Arif, Advocates. Versus THE STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Pawan Sharma, Standing Counsel (Crl), for the State with Mr. Harsh Prabhakar, Advocate. CR...

Tata Motors Limited and Others Vs. the State of West Bengal and Others

Court : Kolkata

..... section 23 and section 24 of the land acquisition act in open court and waited for the states consent on the next date. 77. he further pointed out that even the statement which was made by the learned advocate general on the next date was not straight or fair ..... petitioner paid permits and the costs of registration. the petitioner paid lease rent annually as well as all municipal and panchayet rates and taxes and other outgoings. the writ petitioner admittedly commenced the establishment of a ..... time any law with respect to the same matter including a law adding to, amending, varying or repealing the law so made by the legislature of the state. 118. according to mr. pal if repugnancy exists ..... substantive law or principles before him. 146. mr. pal referred to the decision of delhi transport corporation (supra) and submitted that it may also be characterized as excessive delegation ..... decisions of aswini kumar ghose and anr. vs. arabinda bose and anr. reported in air 1952 sc 369; rakhal chandra basak vs. the secretary for india in council reported ..... if the question pertains to the adequacy of compensation, it is not justiciable; if the compensation fixed or the principles evolved for fixing it disclose that the legislature made the law in fraud of powers in the sense we ..... ajmer reported in air 1959 475], transfer to tenant in possession by way of compulsory purchase of all lands not required by the land holder for their personal cultivation, distribution of the ownership and control .....