Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi
Decided on : Nov-11-2011
DR. RAMESH CHandRA PandA, MEMBER (A) : 1. Through this OA, Shri R. D. Gupta working as Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT) with the respondents, the applicant herein, is seeking payment of full pay and allowances which inter alia includes subsistence allowance from 14.05.2004 (when he was placed under suspension) to the date of filing of the OA (27.07.2009) along with pay arrears of 6th CPC. His prayers are as follows:- “(i)To direct the respondents to release to the applicant his full pay and allowances (which inter alia includes subsistence allowance allowed, but not paid, to the applicant for the period of his suspension), along with annual increments, arrears of 6th Pay Commission, increase in DA etc., w.e.f. May 2004 onwards till date along with compound interest @18% per annum. (ii)To direct the respondents to pass a formal order for regularization of the period of suspension for all purposes. (iii)To award costs of these proceedings which have been thrust upon the applicant f...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Allahabad
Decided on : Oct-21-2011
Ashok Bhushan, J. Large scale acquisition of agricultural and Abadi land of farmers of different villages of Greater Noida and Noida of District Gautam Buddha Nagar in the name of planned industrial development is the subject matter of challenge in these 471 writ petitions. These writ petitions have been placed before this Full Bench under orders of Hon'ble the Chief Justice dated 6.8.2011 on a reference made by a Division Bench in writ petition No. 37443 of 2011 and other connected matters. Writ petition No. 37443 of 2011 challenges the notifications dated 12.3.2008 issued under section 4 read with Sections 17(1) and 17(4) of Land Acquisition Act and notification dated 30.6.2008 by which declaration was made for acquisition of 589.188 hectares land of village Patwari. Similar notifications under section 4 read with Sections 17(1), 17(4) and Section 6 of the Land Acquisition Act were issued with regard to different villages. Several writ petitions were filed challenging the land ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Aug-09-2011
..... section 110 gave unfettered and unguided power to the executive to take away the exemption granted by the legislature and hence that section is void for excessive delegation of legislative powers on the state government. in support of his contention, reliance was placed on the judgments of this court in re: the delhi laws act, 1912, the ajmer-merwara (extension of laws) act, 1947 and the part c states (laws) act ..... a matter of policy that the cantonment areas in a state should be subject to the same legislation relating to control of rent and regulation of housing accommodation as in force in other areas of the state and this policy was given effect ..... appeals and direct the notified authority under the acquisition act to disburse the amount of compensation fixed by the act to the legitimate claimants in accordance with law, which ..... laws added to the ninth schedule, by violating the constitutional amendments after 24.12.1973, if challenged, will be decided on the touchstone of right to ..... made known. the concept of public purpose has been given fairly expansive meaning which has to be justified upon the purpose and object ..... which does not contain a provision for payment of compensation at a rate not less than the market value which follows tha ..... and the impugned act. reference was made to the judgments of this court in state of bihar v. maharajadhiraja sir kameshwar singh of darbhanga and ors. (1952) 1 scr ..... structure and also stated that notwithstanding the repeal of article 31(2), the word .....
Tag this Judgment!