Court : Allahabad
Decided on : Mar-22-2001
Reported in : 2001(2)AWC1213
O. P. Garg, J.1. The petitioner who admittedly is the tenant tn a portion (shop) of premises No. 1856 situated in mohalla Cantonment. Station Road, Banda, has challenged the order dated 3.8.2000 passed by the trial court in S.C.C. Suit No, 4 of 1998 and the order dated 19.1.2001 passed tn Revision Application No. 48 of 2000 under Section 25 of the Provincial Small Causes Courts Act. It is prayed that both the orders being illegal and without jurisdiction be quashed and the respondent No. 3 be commanded not to disturb with the possession of the petitioner over the tenanted accommodation.2. At the initial stage of filing of the present petition, appearance was put in on behalf of the landlord respondent No. 3 through Sri Rajesh Tandon, senior advocate assisted by Sri Pankaj, Srivastava. He made a statement that the petition be finally disposed of on merits on the basis of the material available on record. Sri M. A. Qadeer, learned counsel for the petitioner did not have any objection to ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Mar-29-2001
Reported in : 2001(4)BomCR136; (2001)3BOMLR518
ORDERD.K. Deshmukh, J. 1. This Notice of Motion is taken out by the Judgment Debtors for setting aside the insolvency Notice dated 30th August. 1999, taken out by the Decree Holder. The facts that are material and relevant for deciding this Notice of Motion are that in Appeal No. 636 of 1991 the Division Bench of this Court by order dated 26th June. 1992 passed a consent decree, which according to the Decree Holder is a decree for payment of money. The Decree Holder took out an Insolvency Notice dated 30th August, 1999 and served it on the judgment Debtor on 20th September, 1999. The Notice was taken out under the provisions of the Presidency Towns Insolvency Act, 1909. On being served with that notice the Judgment Debtor has taken out this Notice of Motion for, setting aside that Insolvency Notice on various grounds including the ground that the decree pursuant to which this Insolvency Notice has been taken out is not enforceable, as the decree holder has not obtained a leave of the C...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Mar-29-2001
Reported in : AIR2001SC1903; 2001(1)ALD(Cri)749; 2001ALLMR(Cri)1257(SC); 2001(2)ALT(Cri)131; 2001CriLJ1825; 2001(2)Crimes193(SC); JT2001(4)SC444; 2001(3)SCALE130; (2001)4SCC458; [2001]2S
Sethi, J.1. Legends reveal and the people believe that in the ancient Indian society Bhagwan Krishna took birth to reprieve the suffering humanity from the terror let loose by the demon named Kansa. The birth of Lord Krishna, Janmasthami, is celebrated every year to commemorate the birth of truth for elimination of repression and atrocities. Ironically, thousands of years thereafter, on the day of Janmasthami in the year 1992, the accused, unfortunately named Krishan, along with others, became a devil and like vultures pounced upon the family of Bhagwan Ram, the deceased. After committing a ghastly crime, the accused persons left the scene of occurrence, satisfied with their design of killing the whole of the family. To their misfortune, two of the injured survived who appeared against the accused as PWs 2 and 3. The deceased included Bhagwan Ram, his son Sunder Ran, and Chando Devi, his mother. Spree of killing was resorted to, for eliminating the prosecution witnesses against some of...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Nov-12-2001
Reported in : 2002(1)ALD210; 2002(1)ALD(Cri)137; 2002(1)ALT611; 2002CriLJ1105
S.B. Sinha, C.J. 1. Possession and transport of black jaggery although by itself is not an offence, can the vehicles carrying the same, be liable to be seized under the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh Excise Act and the Andhra Pradesh Prohibition Act is the question involved in these writ applications? 2. Facts of each case may be noticed briefly thus: In Writ Petition No. 354 of 2001 the petitioners were transporting 10176 kilograms of jaggery in a lorry bearing No. ABT 5508. The said lorry was seized and such seizure is challenged in this writ petition on the ground that it is illegal and arbitrary. Writ Petition No. 19706 of 2000 is filed assailing the action of the respondents in interfering with their day-to-day business in all varieties of jaggery and alum. The petitioners in Writ Petition N0.22705 of 2000 seek quashing of the criminal proceedings and also to declare the seizure of jaggery as illegal and void. 3. It is the case of the petitioners that sale of jaggery is neither ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Union Territory Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission UT Chandigarh
Decided on : Apr-10-2001
Dr. P.K. Vasudeva, Member: 1.This is an appeal filed under Section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short hereinafter referred to as the C.P. Act), against the order dated 15.3.1999 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-I, U.T., Chandigarh (for short hereinafter referred to as the District Forum-I), in Complaint Case No. 673 of 1995. The District Forum-I allowed the complaint and directed the opposite party to make the payment of loss assessed by the Surveyor i.e. Rs. 34,046/- alongwith interest @ 12% per annum from 12.6.1994 till the date of payment to the complainant. Apart from it, the District Forum-I also awarded Rs. 2,000/- as compensation and costs, to the complainant. 2. Briefly, the complainant Shri Ujaggar Singh son of Late Sh. Inder Singh c/o Sewak Transport Co., Booth No. 12, Sector 26, Chandigarh was the owner of truck, bearing Registration No. PB-12A-4785 which was insured with the appellant/opposite party vide Policy No. 31121400 31787 vali...
Tag this Judgment!