Court : Karnataka
Decided on : May-29-1998
Reported in : ILR1998KAR3104
ORDERHari Nath Tilhari, J.1. By these Revision Petitions which have been moved under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the revisionist applicants have challenged the orders dated April 15, 1993 and 3rd July 1993 in E.A.T. Appeal Nos.5/92 and 6/92 respectively passed by the Educational Appellate Tribunal No. 1, Bijapur.2. The facts of the case in brief are that the teacher who is also an employee of the respondent-institution, having felt aggrieved from inaction of the Management-Board in not paying his salary from 1.6.1989 till 1.3.1992, the Management having replied to the notice issued by the employee, filed an appeal under Section 8 of the Karnataka Private Educational Institutions (Discipline and Control) Act, 1975 and the Tribunal, after having considered the matter, issued the following directions:-'In the result, the appeal is allowed. Acting under Section 10(4) of the Karnataka Private Educational Institutions (Discipline and Control) Act, 1975 the following order is ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Nov-05-1998
Reported in : 1999(1)ALLMR378; 1999(1)BomCR269
ORDERP.S. Patankar, J.1. This is challenging the Award dated 14th June, 1996. The respondent No. 1 was granted the work of construction of a School Building at Malvani, Malad (West). The petitioners issued a letter dated 6th May, 1985 entrusting the said work to the respondent No. 1. This was because of the earlier grant of work to the respondent No. 1 for building a school of Gandhigram Scheme School at Juhu. The same rates were affected for the construction at Malwani. Respondent No. 1 sent a letter dated 8th May, 1985 giving proposal for the lumpsum payment for steel for the construction with an additional premium of 9.9%. The Additional Municipal Commissioner gave approval on 15-5-85 to the said proposal of the respondent No. 1. On 6th August, 1985, the Executive Engineer conveyed the said decision of the Additional Municipal Commissioner. The date of commencement was fixed at 11-7-85 and to be completed before September 1988. The contract was valued at Rs. 1,33,20,500/-. On 12th D...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Patna
Decided on : Feb-10-1998
1. This contempt proceeding relates to an unfortunate incident, which had taken place in the courtroom and chambers of Sri D.N. Barai, 1st Additional District & Sessions Judge at Bhagalpur on 18.11.1997, when several police officials in pre-planned and calculated manner had made murderous attack on him.2. Since admittedly the incident had undermined the dignity of Courts of the whole country, Judicial officers, Judges, Lawyers and Organisations like Bar Council of India, the Bihar State Bar Council, Judicial Officers' Association & Advocate Associations, including lawyers of the High Court felt insecured and humiliated. It would appear from various affidavits and newspapers that the State Government, the Chief Secretary, the Director General of Police, and other various organisations of the State had also condemned this unfortunate and unprecedented incident. We fully appreciate the sentiment and reaction of the lawyers and different authorities, as noticed above. Because for any civi...
Tag this Judgment!