Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: delhi and ajmer rent control act 1952 repealed section 24 fixing of fair rate Court: delhi Year: 2019 Page 1 of about 2 results (0.144 seconds)

Jan 07 2019 (HC)

Shobha Aggarwal and Ors. Vs.uoi and Anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-07-2019

..... on or after the 2nd day of june, 1944,- (a) in any case where the rent of such premises has been fixed under the delhi and ajmer-merwar rent control act, 1947 (19 of 1947) or the delhi and ajmer rent control act, 1952 (38 of 1952),- (i) if such rent per annum does not exceed twelve hundred rupees, the rent so fixed; or (ii) if such rent per annum exceeds twelve hundred rupees, the rent so fixed together with fifteen per cent. of such rent; (b) in any other case, the rent calculated on the basis of [(note: subs. by act 57 of 1988, sec.3, for "seven and one-half per cent" (w ..... and fix standard rent. relevant provisions of the drc act.38. the definition clause (section2) of the drc act, to the extent it is relevant, states as follows: 2. definitions.-. in this act, unless the context otherwise requires- (a) "basic rent", in relation to premises let out before the 2nd day of june, 1944, means the basic rent of such premises as determined in accordance with the provisions of the second schedule; (b) "controller" means a controller appointed under sub- section (1) of section 35 and includes an additional controller appointed under sub-section (2) of that section; (c) "fair rate" means the fair rate fixed under section 31 and includes the rate as revised under section .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 01 2019 (HC)

Tirupati Buildings and Offices Pvt. Ltd. Vs.reserve Bank of India

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-01-2019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: May 29, 2019 Judgment delivered on: July 01, 2019 + W.P.(C) 3356/2019, CM No.23095/2019 TIRUPATI BUILDINGS AND OFFICES PVT. LTD. Through: Mr. Parag P. Tripathi, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Pulkit Deora, Ms. Mishika Bajpai and Ms. Sylvine Sarmah, Advs. ........ Petitioner versus RESERVE BANK OF INDIA Through: Mr. Suhail Dutt, Sr. Adv. with ..... Respondent Mr. H.S. Parihar, Mr. Kuldeep Parihar, Mr. Azhar Alam, and Mr. Sankalp Goswami, Advs. for RBI. Mr. Arun Aggarwal, Adv. for R2. Mr. Prateek Kushwaha, Adv. for R3. Mr. K.P.S. Kohli, Adv. for R-4 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT V. KAMESWAR RAO, J1 The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers: In view of the facts and circumstances mentioned above it is most humbly prayed that this Honble Court may graciously be pleased to: W.P.(C) No.3356/2019 Page 1 of 45 (a) Direct the Respondent No.1 to take a decision on the Assignment pertaini...

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //