Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: dangerous machines regulation act 1983 chapter ii administration of the act Year: 1981 Page 1 of about 2 results (0.090 seconds)

S.P. Gupta Vs. President of India and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1982SC149; 1981Supp(1)SCC87; [1982]2SCR365

..... following limitation:(1) any executive or administrative regulation purporting in general terms to authorize refusal to disclose official records in a particular department when duly requested as evidence in a court of justice should be deemed void.(2) any statute declaring in general ..... bona fide or that the grounds relied on by the minister are insufficient or misconceived or not clearly expressed or that there are no reasonable grounds for apprehending danger to the public interest, the court has a residual power to override the objection. for this purpose, the court is entitled to see the documents before ordering production ..... . but. it does appear that canbinet, papers, minutes of discussions of heads of departments and high level documents relating to the inner working of the government machine or concerned with the framing of government policies belong to this class which in the public interest must be regarded as protected against disclosure,70. now, ..... 587. before finally closing is chapter we might mention that another reason given by brother venkataramiah, j. for upholding the impugned order was that under section 114(e) of the evidence act there is a presumption that official acts must be deemed to have ..... state of tamil nadu v. pyare lal malhotra : 1983(13)elt1582(sc) beg, j. (as he then was) observed thus (at d. 803):the reason given, in the statement of objects and reasons of the 1972 act, for an elucidation of the 'definition' of iron and steel, was that the 'definition .....

Pennhurst State Sch. and Hosp. Vs. Halderman

Court : US Supreme Court

..... scheme of the act. rather, the compromise is best understood as a rejection of either the need or the ability of congress to specify the required standards in a manner resembling administrative regulations. [ footnote 2/13 ] iv as previously stated, 6010 should be understood to require a state receiving funds under the act to observe the ..... with developmental disabilities (especially those persons without familial protection) who are receiving treatment, services, or habilitation under programs assisted under this chapter will be protected consistent with section 6010 of this title (relating to the rights of the developmentally disabled)." pennsylvania has submitted a plan under ..... legislate under the spending power thus rests on whether the state voluntarily and knowingly accepts the terms of the "contract." see steward machine co. v. davis, 301 u. s. 548 , 301 u. s. 585 -598 (1937); harris v. ..... of persons to pennhurst. as amended in 1975, the complaint alleged, inter alia, that conditions at pennhurst were unsanitary, inhumane, and dangerous. specifically, the complaint averred that these conditions denied the class members due process and equal protection of the law in violation of the fourteenth ..... be protected and assured by the congress and the courts"). accordingly, page 451 u. s. 53 i would hold that jurisdiction under 1983 was properly invoked in these cases under thiboutot. vi i would vacate the judgment of the court of appeals and remand the cases for further proceedings .....