Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: dangerous machines regulation act 1983 chapter ii administration of the act Sorted by: recent Court: uk supreme court Year: 1981 Page 1 of about 1 results (0.096 seconds)

Pennhurst State Sch. and Hosp. Vs. Halderman

Court : US Supreme Court

..... scheme of the act. rather, the compromise is best understood as a rejection of either the need or the ability of congress to specify the required standards in a manner resembling administrative regulations. [ footnote 2/13 ] iv as previously stated, 6010 should be understood to require a state receiving funds under the act to observe the ..... with developmental disabilities (especially those persons without familial protection) who are receiving treatment, services, or habilitation under programs assisted under this chapter will be protected consistent with section 6010 of this title (relating to the rights of the developmentally disabled)." pennsylvania has submitted a plan under ..... legislate under the spending power thus rests on whether the state voluntarily and knowingly accepts the terms of the "contract." see steward machine co. v. davis, 301 u. s. 548 , 301 u. s. 585 -598 (1937); harris v. ..... of persons to pennhurst. as amended in 1975, the complaint alleged, inter alia, that conditions at pennhurst were unsanitary, inhumane, and dangerous. specifically, the complaint averred that these conditions denied the class members due process and equal protection of the law in violation of the fourteenth ..... be protected and assured by the congress and the courts"). accordingly, page 451 u. s. 53 i would hold that jurisdiction under 1983 was properly invoked in these cases under thiboutot. vi i would vacate the judgment of the court of appeals and remand the cases for further proceedings .....