Court : Karnataka
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE27H DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2019 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE P.B. BAJANTHRI WRIT PETITION NO.1633 OF2019(GM-KEB) PETITIONERBETWEEN : HASSAN THERMAL POWER PVT. LTD., THRU ITS DIRECTOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE: S-327 GREATER KAILASH-II NEW DELHI- 110 048 (SRI.ANOOP GEORGE CHAUDHARI, LEARNED SENIOR COUNSEL ALONG WITH MRS.JUNE CHAUDARI, MR. R K MAROOLA, MR.SUNIL MAREELA, MS.PRATHIBA SHARMA, MS.ISHA THAKUR ADVS for SRI K S BHEEMAIAH ) AND:_ 1.2. (BY SRI V SREENIDHI, AGA FOR R.1, KARNATAKA POWER TRANSMISSION CORPORATION LTD., THRU ITS FINANCIAL ADVISOR (REGULATORY AFFAIRS) REGD. OFFICE KAVERI BHAWAN K.R.CIRCLE BANGALORE-560 009 STATE OF KARNATAKA THRU ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY VIDHANA SOUDHA BANGALORE-560 001 RESPONDENTS2SRI S S NAGANAND, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI S SRIRANGA FOR C/R.2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED:17. 12.2018 PASSED ELEC...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE9H DAY OF JANUARY, 2018 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE B.V. NAGARATHNA WRIT PETITION Nos.3536-3538/2015 & WRIT PETITION No.3539/2015 (LA-KIADB) S/O. NARAPPA, AGED ABOUT53YEARS, S/O. NAGAPPA, AGED ABOUT50YEARS, S/O. MURIGEPPA, AGED ABOUT46YEARS, BETWEEN:1. D. SHARANAPPA2 D. JAYAPPA3 B.M. SHIVAKUMAR4 B. MANJAPPA5 D. BASAVARAJA S/O. NARAPPAM, AGED ABOUT48YEARS, (BY SRI: P.H. VIRUPAKSHAIAH, ADVOCATE) AND:1. ALL ARE R/AT MAHAJENAHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, HARIHARA TALUK, DAVANAGERE DISTRICT 577 601. S/O. H.B. REVANAPPA, AGED ABOUT50YEARS ... PETITIONERS STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE & INDUSTRIES, VIKASA SOUDHA, BENGALURU 560 001. REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.2. KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD, #14/3, 2ND FLOOR, R.P.BUILDING, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD, 2 BENGALURU 560 001. REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER.3.4. SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD, NRUPATHUNGA...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
- 1 - R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE27H DAY OF APRIL, 2018 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE B.V.NAGARATHNA WRIT PETITION NOs.15967-15969/2017 c/w 21196/2017, 18876/2016 & 18948-18950/2016 (LA-BDA) & 21193-21195/2017 (BDA) W.P.Nos.15967-15969/2017 BETWEEN:1. SRI S. HAREESH S/O. LATE N. SHANTHARAM, AGED ABOUT52YEARS, 73/52, 2ND FLOOR, CHANDRA APARTMENT, 4TH CROSS, BASAWESHWAR LAYOUT, VIJAYANAGAR, BANGALORE 560 040.2.3. SRI M.S. SHANMUKHA S/O. M.K. SHIVANNA, AGED ABOUT36YEARS, MUDDALINGANAHALLI VILLAGE, THYAMGONDALU HOBLI, NELAMANGALA TALUK, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT 562 132. SRI S. GURUPRASAD S/O. LATE N. SHANTHARAM, AGED ABOUT37YEARS, NO.24, 13TH CROSS, GAYATHRI LAYOUT, BASAVANAPURA ROAD, K.R. PURAM, BANGALORE 560 036. ... PETITIONERS (BY SRI: UDAYA HOLLA, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR SMT. MAYA HOLLA, ADVOCATE) AND:1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, - 2 - 2.3. 4.5. URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDING, BANGALORE 560 001. THE BANGALORE DEV...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
- 1 - R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE14H DAY OF DECEMBER, 2017 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE B.V.NAGARATHNA WRIT PETITION Nos.17852-17856/2014 & 17969/2014 c/w W.P.Nos.17290/2014 & 17673-17687/2014, W.P.No.20626/2016 (LA-BDA) In W.P.Nos.17852-17856/2014 & 17969/2014 BETWEEN:1. M/S. EVERSHINE MONUMENTS (EARLIER KNOWN AS M/S. GRANITE EXPORTERS) A PARTNERSHIP FIRM HAVING ITS OFFICE AT NO.15, VITTAL MALLYA ROAD, BANGALORE, REP. BY ITS PARTNER, MR. MUNNAVAR BASHA AGED ABOUT83YEARS.2. MR. MUNNAVAR BASHA S/O. LATE MOHAMMED BASHA, AGED ABOUT83YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.15 VITTAL MALLYA ROAD, BANGALORE 560 001.3. MRS. MAQBOOL JAAN W/O. ASGAR AHAMAD PASHA, AGED ABOUT50YEARS, RESIDING AT LAKSHMIPURAM, KUPPAM, ANDHRA PRADESH 517 425.4. MRS. MUDASHIRA BEGUM D/O. ASGAR AHAMAD PASHA, AGED ABOUT45YEARS, RESIDING AT LAKSHMIPURAM, KUPPAM, ANDHRA PRADESH 517 425.5. MRS. REHANA BEGUM D/O. ASGAR AHAMAD PASHA, - 2 - AGED ABOUT40YEARS, RESIDING AT LAKSHMIPURAM, KUPPAM, ANDHRA PRAD...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
- :1. :- R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE01T DAY OF DECEMBER, 2020 PRESENT THE HONBLE MRS.JUSTICE B.V.NAGARATHNA AND THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE N.S.SANJAY GOWDA W.A.No.1415/2018 (LA BDA) BETWEEN: SRI. L.RAMAREDDY, SON OF LATE LINGA REDDY, AGED ABOUT73YEARS, RESIDING AT No.10/1, 26TH MAIN ROAD, HSR LAYOUT, AGARA VILLAGE, AGARA POST, BENGALURU 560 034. APPELLANT (BY SRI. SAMPATH BAPAT, ADVOCATE) AND:1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU 560 001. REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY.2. THE COMMISSIONER, BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BENGALURU 560 020.3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, - :2. :- KUMARA PARK WEST, BENGALURU 560 020.4. NANDA RANGASWAMY, WIFE OF RANGASWAMY, AGED ABOUT38YEARS, RESIDING AT No.213, D BLOCK, BRIGADE PALM SPRING APARTMENT, J.P.NAGAR7H PHASE, BENGALURU 560 078.5. SHAMEEM FATIMA, WIFE OF M.ENAYATH ULLA SHARIFF, AGED ABOUT59YEARS, REPRESENTED BY G...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
- 1 - WP No.10103 of 2020 C/W WP No.12483 of 2020 WP No.12537 of 2020 WP No.14110 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE19H DAY OF JULY, 2022 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION No.10103 OF2020(LA-RES) C/W WRIT PETITION No.12483 OF2020WRIT PETITION No.12537 OF2020WRIT PETITION No.14110 OF2021IN W.P. NO.10103/2020 BETWEEN:1. SHRI. MANOHAR PATEL.R AGED ABOUT46YEARS S/O RAMU.R @ V.R. RAMANNA RESIDING AT3D MAIN, VALAGERE HALLI RANGAPPA LAYOUT, BEHIND SHANKAR NAGAR TIPTUR-572202, TUMKUR DISTRICT2 MOHAN PATEL AGED ABOUT44YEARS S/O RAMU.R @ V.R. RAMANNA RESIDING AT3D MAIN VALAGERE HALLI, RANGAPPA LAYOUT BEHIND SHANKAR NAGAR TIPTUR-572202, TUMKUR DISTRICT ...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. CLIFTON D. ROZARIO, ADVOCATE AND SMT. MAITREYI KRISHNAN, ADVOCATE) AND:1. UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT & HIGHWAYS NEW DELHI-110001 REP. BY ITS SECRETARY - 2 - WP No.10103 of 2020 C/W WP No.12483 of 2020 WP No.12537 of 2020 WP No.14110 of 2021 2. STATE O...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
- 1 - WP No.10103 of 2020 C/W WP No.12483 of 2020 WP No.12537 of 2020 WP No.14110 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE19H DAY OF JULY, 2022 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION No.10103 OF2020(LA-RES) C/W WRIT PETITION No.12483 OF2020WRIT PETITION No.12537 OF2020WRIT PETITION No.14110 OF2021IN W.P. NO.10103/2020 BETWEEN:1. SHRI. MANOHAR PATEL.R AGED ABOUT46YEARS S/O RAMU.R @ V.R. RAMANNA RESIDING AT3D MAIN, VALAGERE HALLI RANGAPPA LAYOUT, BEHIND SHANKAR NAGAR TIPTUR-572202, TUMKUR DISTRICT2 MOHAN PATEL AGED ABOUT44YEARS S/O RAMU.R @ V.R. RAMANNA RESIDING AT3D MAIN VALAGERE HALLI, RANGAPPA LAYOUT BEHIND SHANKAR NAGAR TIPTUR-572202, TUMKUR DISTRICT ...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. CLIFTON D. ROZARIO, ADVOCATE AND SMT. MAITREYI KRISHNAN, ADVOCATE) AND:1. UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT & HIGHWAYS NEW DELHI-110001 REP. BY ITS SECRETARY - 2 - WP No.10103 of 2020 C/W WP No.12483 of 2020 WP No.12537 of 2020 WP No.14110 of 2021 2. STATE O...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
- 1 - WP No.10103 of 2020 C/W WP No.12483 of 2020 WP No.12537 of 2020 WP No.14110 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE19H DAY OF JULY, 2022 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION No.10103 OF2020(LA-RES) C/W WRIT PETITION No.12483 OF2020WRIT PETITION No.12537 OF2020WRIT PETITION No.14110 OF2021IN W.P. NO.10103/2020 BETWEEN:1. SHRI. MANOHAR PATEL.R AGED ABOUT46YEARS S/O RAMU.R @ V.R. RAMANNA RESIDING AT3D MAIN, VALAGERE HALLI RANGAPPA LAYOUT, BEHIND SHANKAR NAGAR TIPTUR-572202, TUMKUR DISTRICT2 MOHAN PATEL AGED ABOUT44YEARS S/O RAMU.R @ V.R. RAMANNA RESIDING AT3D MAIN VALAGERE HALLI, RANGAPPA LAYOUT BEHIND SHANKAR NAGAR TIPTUR-572202, TUMKUR DISTRICT ...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. CLIFTON D. ROZARIO, ADVOCATE AND SMT. MAITREYI KRISHNAN, ADVOCATE) AND:1. UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT & HIGHWAYS NEW DELHI-110001 REP. BY ITS SECRETARY - 2 - WP No.10103 of 2020 C/W WP No.12483 of 2020 WP No.12537 of 2020 WP No.14110 of 2021 2. STATE O...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Reported in : II(1994)ACC309; ILR1993KAR3367
ORDERN.D.V. Bhat, J.1. This Revision Petition is directed against the order dated 20-9-1989 passed by the Principal Civil Judge, Dharwad in Arbitration Case No. 2/1987. By the said order the learned Civil Judge dismissed the application filed by the instant petitioner under Section 8 of the Arbitration Act.2. A few facts necessary for the disposal of this Revision Petition, briefly stated, are as under:The petitioner was the owner of a truck bearing registration No. MEZ 7399. He had insured the said truck with the respondents. The estimated value of the said truck was stated to be Rs. 2,50,000/-. The duration of the insurance policy was for the period from 24-2-1985 to 24-2-1986.3. When this was so, the truck in question was involved in a fire accident on 8-5-1985. Thereafter the petitioner put in his claim with the respondents. After protracted negotiation, it appears that the Insurance Company was ready and willing to pay an amount of Rs. 1,69,500/- in full satisfaction of the claim ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Reported in : 2006(3)ARBLR396(Kar); 2006(2)KarLJ550
Anand Byrareddy, J.1. This appeal arises out of a judgment rendered in a suit under Section 20 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act' for brevity). The appeal is by the defendant in the suit.2. For the sake of convenience, the parties would be referred to by their rank in the suit.3. The facts of the case are as follows.-The defendant had invited tenders in respect of certain civil construction works. The plaintiff was the successful tenderer and was awarded the contract in terms of an agreement dated 17-11-1986. The works were duly completed in May 1988. A final bill was prepared and furnished to the respondent on 2-3-1989. The plaintiff found major discrepancies in the bill and in this regard wrote to the defendant by letters, dated 1-5-1989 and 18-5-1989 calling upon it to re-examine the same and make payment. There was no response and it is in this circumstance, legal notice was issued and was followed up with a suit on the ground that the agreement betw...
Tag this Judgment!