Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: customs tariff amendment act 2003 chapter x cereals Court: mumbai Year: 2010 Page 1 of about 5 results (0.108 seconds)

Karan Dileep Nevatia Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) Through the Commerce ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2010(112)BomLR127; 2010(172)LC1(Bombay)

..... countries and gives uncalled for protection to domestic wine merchants.15. impugned notification no. bwk.0509/imp/cr-143/ exc-3 dated 22/7/2009 amending the maharashtra potable liquor (fixation of maximum retail prices) rules, 2009 increases the disparity of pricing between imported wines and domestic wines particularly since the ..... on or about 8/7/1948, the government of india became a signatory and subsequently ratified trading agreements with various countries known as the 'general agreement on tariffs and trade' (for short, 'gatt'). the organization overseeing the multilateral trading system was then known as 'gatt, 1947' and the signatory countries to the ..... as follows:law includes any ordinance, order, by-law, rule, regulation, notification, custom or usage having in the territory of india the force of law. 44. section 3(29) of the general clauses act provides as follows:indian law' shall mean any act, ordinance, regulation, rule [order, bye-law or other instrument] which before the .....

Ferani Hotels Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Nusli Neville Wadia

Court : Mumbai

..... section. the parsi community would like to be exempted from such a provision so that a parsi can bequeath his property without any restrictions.the amending act of 1991, aside from bringing about the gender equality and eliminating the gender discrimination that prevailed for succession amongst parsis in chapter iii of the indian succession ..... constitution of india as discriminatory, it being then applicable only to christians. besides, section 118 did not apply to parsis since the amending act of 1991. it is contended by the respondent that the act could not have retrospective operation and hence did not apply to a will which took effect in 1970, though it may apply to ..... wills executed after the amendment.69. it was under these state of affairs that the u.s. charities settled their claim under memorandum of .....

Vodafone International Holdings B.V. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Mumbai

..... .singhvi submitted that the tax authority is not competent to treat the petitioner as an assessee in default under section 201, as amended by the finance act, 2008 and the amendment to section 201 by the finance act, 2008 is unconstitutional. we have not considered it appropriate to adjudicate upon the submission of dr.singhvi at this stage because ..... with the entire catch were brought to 43 2010 (6) scale 442.an indian port, where the catch was certified for consumption, valued and it was after customs and port clearances that the non- resident received 85% of the catch. it was after the catch was apportioned at chennai, that the non-resident obtained control ..... fruits of the investment made by htil in india, goodwill/brand value generated by htil for the hutch brand in india, the telecom licences granted in india, customer base in india and the prospect of future development and expansion of business in india. further, all obligations cast upon the parties as per the transaction documents, .....

Fdc Ltd and Another Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise and Another

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

..... period april 1997 to march 1998, the lower authorities classified both the items under heading 29.36 (sh 2936.00) of the first schedule to the central excise tariff act and the assessee (appellant) wants both the items to be classified as medicaments under heading 30.03 (sh 3003.10) of the said schedule. for the period ..... both the items. the classification of the goods under the ceta schedule has, however, to be done in terms of the provisions of the relevant heading in the tariff. sh 3003.10 is a heading for patent or proprietary medicaments, other than those medicaments which are exclusively ayurvedic, unani, siddha, homeopathic or biochemic. the term ..... 29.36 and same cannot be classified as medicaments inasmuch as such mixtures of provitamins and vitamins can only be classified under heading 29.36 of the tariff schedule read with hsn explanatory notes. it is pointed out that vitamins are described in hsn notes as exogenous biocatalysts whose absence or deficiency in human body .....

M/S.Malaysian Airlines. M/S.Saudi Arabian Airlines. and ors Vs. the Un ...

Court : Mumbai

..... dismissed appeal of the petitioner and upheld the orderinoriginal. aggrieved by the aforesaid order dated 28th october, 2003, petitioner invoked revision jurisdiction under section 129dd of the customs act, 1962 ("customs act" for short) before the joint secretary to the government of india, department of revenue, new delhi on 31st december, 2003, which came to be dismissed vide ..... (5). however, simultaneously, with the insertion of new subsection (3) of section 38, proviso to rule 11 was not amended. proviso to rule 11 continued as it is. it provided that no customs officers shall be competent to impose penalty exceeding rs.5,000/. he, thus, submits that this is a clear case of ..... erroneously sustained the penalty on the ground that inconsistency between rule 11 and section 38(3) is removed later on 13th october, 2003 by deleting proviso and amended rule 11 will apply. he submits that it is settled position in law that the provision, as in force on the date of alleged contravention, can .....