Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: customs tariff amendment act 2003 chapter x cereals Court: delhi Page 4 of about 306 results (0.094 seconds)

Mar 19 2001 (HC)

M/S. Gmnco Ltd. Vs. Shri Ravi Gupta

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2001VAD(Delhi)350; AIR2001Delhi409; 92(2001)DLT494; 2001(59)DRJ614; 2003(156)ELT476(Del)

..... that there was a prima facie case for grant of an ex-parte injunction, the appellant was restrained from getting the machines released from the bond of bombay customs. after the appellant was served and appeared in court, it appears that some efforts was made to have the matter settled, for which purpose adjournment prayed ..... learned single judge by way of an ex parte ad interim order of injunction restrained the appellant from getting the machines released from the bond of bombay customs, which find a mention in the prayer clause of the said application.2. the main grievance of the appellant has been that though the appellant applied ..... court granted ad-interim relief was not maintainable. only after the appellant raised objection about maintainability that the plaint was amended. now decree for specific performance has been sought.16. section 10 of the specific relief act, 1963 is under chapter ii, which enumerates the cases in which specific performance of a contract can be enforced. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 10 2010 (HC)

M/S. Bharat Steel Tubes Ltd. Vs Ifci Ltd.

Court : Delhi

..... loans and mounting levels of non- performing assets of banks and financial institutions "14. similarly in the amendment act of 2004 the object behind enactment of sarfaesi act was reiterated in the following purpose: "the securitization and reconstruction of financial asset and enforcement of security interest act, 2002 was enacted to regulate securitization and reconstruction of financial assets and enforcement of security interest and ..... it was by way of the instant suit. in support of this proposition mr andhyarujina relied upon the following judgments:east india commercial co. ltd., calcutta & anr. vs collector of customs, calcutta air 1962 sc 1893; whirlpool corporation vs registrar of trade marks, mumbai (1998) 8 scc 1 and cochin international airport ltd vs presiding officer, drt & ors. 2010 (114) drj .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 04 2015 (HC)

Sony India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. The Commissioner of Trade and Taxes

Court : Delhi

..... labels by connecting to a label printer specifically designed for use with the digital camera.8525.40girs 1 and 6 34. further, the custom tariff act also specifically mentions dscs as falling under tariff heading 8525 8020 and this is under the overall description under chapter 85 relating to ita bound expositions. by a circular dated 10th ..... legislation reproduces sub-item 85.25 as it is. the mizoram legislation again reproduces sub-item 85.25 as recommended by the empowered committee. the orissa vat amendment act 2005 which encloses entry 69(o) in part ii reproduces the exact wording of sub-item 85.25. 41. the above narration is useful in understanding ..... supreme court explained in the context of an ambiguity in entry 18 of para 5 of part vii (a) of the scheduled castes and scheduled tribes order (amendment) act that punctuation marks by themselves do not control the meaning of a statute when its meaning is otherwise obvious ?. in afcons infrastructure ltd. v. cherian varkey construction .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 29 2016 (HC)

Cellular Operators Association of India and Others Vs. Telecom Regulat ...

Court : Delhi

..... licence; (ii) notwithstanding anything contained in the terms and conditions the licence granted before the commencement of the telecom regulatory authority of india (amendment) act, 2000, fix the terms and conditions of inter-connectivity between the service providers; (iii) ensure technical compatibility and effective inter-connection between different ..... at any rate, the financial disincentive provided under the quality of service regulations is payable to trai towards non compliance of network and customer related parameters specified therein, whereas the impugned regulations provide reliefs to the consumers for deficiency in service. it is also pointed out ..... generating companies or transmission licensees fall under the head mandatory functions whereas advising the central government on formulation of national electricity policy and tariff policy would fall under the head advisory functions . in this sense, the central commission is the decision-making authority. such decision- .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 13 2012 (HC)

Lg Electronics India Pvt Ltd Vs. Bharat Bhogilal Patel and Others

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2012(5)CTC(IP)1

..... of the agreement on implementation of article vi of gatt( general agreement on tariff and trade), for the imposition of anti-dumping duty under section 9a of the customs act, and to which india is a party while interpreting rule 14(d) of the customs tariff (identification, assessment, and collection of anti-dumping duty on /dumped articles and ..... present form raises doubts as to how in the absence of such rules and mechanism of determination, the customs can be given such powers of adjudication of the claims relating to patents without amendments to the patents act relating to the same. thus, it raises further doubts as to how the interpretation given by the ..... per the international law and the international covenant. 72. let me now see the municipal law of patents and customs. the patents act of 1970 (as amended in 2005) no where provides for the jurisdiction of customs to adjudicate the patent claims and not the jurisdiction to examine the validity of the patent in the infringement .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 01 2016 (HC)

Ebiz.Com Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Delhi

..... 89 has to be made by the court. prior thereto, there can only be prima facie determination of such commission of offence. it may also be noted that by the amendments of 2013 the structure of section 89 underwent a change. a distinction was drawn between the offences of the type described under section 89 (1) (a), (b) and ..... between the offence where the amount exceeds rs. 50 lakhs (raised to rs. 1 crore by a circular dated 23rd october, 2015 and now rs. 2 crore by the 2016 amendment) and where it is less than rs. 50 lakhs. in the case of the offences under section 89 (1) (a), (b) and (c), which are treated as ..... , r.a.w, central bureau of investigation (cbi) , cid, tariff police, mounted police and itbp which have the power to detain a person and to interrogated him in connection with the investigation of economic offences, offences under the essential commodities act, excise and customs act. foreign exchange regulation act etc. there are instances of torture and death in custody of these .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 30 2016 (HC)

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Publ) Vs. Competition Commission of I ...

Court : Delhi

..... such set of provisions came into force on 31st march, 2003. the competition act has been subsequently amended by the competition (amendment) act, 2007 and the competition (amendment) act, 2009. 114. the preamble of the competition act reads as under:- "an act to provide, keeping in view of the economic development of the country, for ..... ensure inter-operability. this is to ensure that information is transmitted through various products (such as handsets and networks) used by various industry participants and customers. 184. universal mobile telecommunication system (hereafter 'umts') standard which has been set by etsi, has also been accepted in various other countries including ..... non-discriminatory ("frand") terms and conditions under such ipr to at least the following extent: manufacture, including the right to make or have made customized components and sub-systems to the licensee's own design for use in manufacture; sell, lease, or otherwise dispose of equipment so manufactured; repair, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 03 2016 (HC)

Suresh Kumar Bansal and Others Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Delhi

..... property and, therefore, such charges were not exigible to service tax. 9. next, mr agrawal contended that with effect from 1st july, 2012 the act has been amended and service tax was imposed on all services other than those specified in the negative list. he submitted that services covered under section 65(105)(zzzh ..... the purpose and object of introducing the impugned explanation was explained in a circular dated 26th february, 2010 issued by the central board of excise and customs, the relevant extract of which is reproduced below:- service tax on construction services 8.1 the service tax on construction of commercial or industrial construction services ..... the legislative competence to levy service tax in relation to the services rendered in construction of a complex. however, as explained in commissioner central excise and customs, kerala v. larsen and toubro ltd. (supra) in absence of machinery provisions to exclude non-service elements from a composite contract, the levy on services .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 22 2015 (HC)

Sujata Sharma Vs. Manju Gupta

Court : Delhi

..... 2, 3, 4 and 7. ms. mala goel, the learned counsel for the plaintiff submits that pursuant to the hindu succession (amendment) act, 2005 (hereinafter referred to as the 'amended act') which amended the hindu succession act, 1956, all rights which were available to a hindu male are now also available to a hindu female. she submits that a daughter ..... therefore, the undefined rights will have to be gleaned from customs as well as from the interpretation of ancient texts regarding hindu religion. he submits that insofar as the right of management has not been specifically conferred on ..... and 9 of the written statement regarding the powers and functions of a karta which are of wide amplitude. finally, he submits that the limitation apropos customs under section 4 is not comprehensive. he submits that section 6 defines the rights only with respect to the inheritance of property and not its management; .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 27 2015 (HC)

F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. and Others Vs. Cipla Ltd. and Another

Court : Delhi

..... the fact that it a specific definition pertaining to pharmaceuticals. 47. section 3 is an exclusionary clause'. the present provision was expanded by way of the patents (amendment) act, 2005. despite the fact that inventionis exhaustively defined, the need for an exclusionary provision obviously arose from the legislative intent that as a matter of policy, due ..... the order passed by the learned single judge was dismissed on april 24, 2009, on the back of a heavily public interest-centric reading of the patents act, 1970 as amended from time to time, and a detailed discussion of the relative affordability of the two drugs to the common man; and the decision is reported as ..... sh.arvind nigam, sr.advocate and ms.pratibha m.singh, sr.advocate who appeared for cipla laboured through the case law, the provisions of the patents act, 1970 as amended from time to time, the pleadings of the parties, the various documents exhibited at the trial and the deposition of the witnesses of the two parties. .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //