Court : Supreme Court of India
..... it would be useful to quote a paragraph from blackstone's commentaries on the laws of england (commentaries on the laws of england of sir william blackstone) vol. ..... so closely does the law of england enforce that excellent rule of gospel-morality, of doing to others, as we would they should do unto ourselves . 75. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... .34. the different functions of the prerogative writs of prohibition, certiorari and mandamus have been thus described in halsbury's laws of england, fourth ..... p. 1885, and halsbury's laws of england, fourth .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... there is nothing more definitely settled than that the house of commons in england, and the different colonial legislatures, have not, and never have had, criminal jurisdiction. ..... the evolution of legislative privileges can be traced back to medieval england when there was an ongoing tussle for power between the monarch and parliament. ..... sr das, j explored the judgments delivered in various jurisdictions, such as england, australia, and the united states to conclude that this court cannot be denuded of its power to depart from its previous decisions, particularly on questions of interpretation of the constitution. ..... the act was a crucial constitutional initiative by parliament in england to lay claim to its status by 62 erskine may s treatise on the law, privileges, proceedings and usage of parliament, lexisnexis, 25th ed. ..... they cannot also be expanded into those of the house of commons in england for all purposes. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
reportable2024insc109in the supreme court of india civil appellate jurisdiction civil appeal no.3854 of2014vasantha (dead) thr. lr. appellant(s) versus rajalakshmi @ rajam (dead) respondent(s) thr.lrs. judgment [ sanjay karol, j.1. the action that set in motion the instant dispute was in the year 1947, when a mother transferred property inherited at the death of her husband, in one form to her two sons and in another, to her daughter. some forty-odd years later, the daughter s husband filed a suit in respect of such property, in 1993. the additional district munsiff1 decided the matter in 1999. the additional district and session judge2 returned a decision on the first appeal in 2002. the second appeal was decided by the high court3 in 2012. it is against this order and judgment in second appeal that the present civil appeal has been preferred. 1 trial court 2 first appellate court 3 impugned judgment 1| civil appeal no.3854 of 2014 background facts2 it would be necessary to advert to the facts underlying the present dispute.3. on 10th july 1947, one thayammal executed a settlement deed4 granting rights in her property to her two sons namely raghavulu naidu and chinnakrishnan @ munusamy naidu5 for their lives and thereafter to the former s two daughters namely saroja and rajalakshmi (present respondent now represented through lrs). saroja pre-deceased thayammal as also her father and uncle, in 1951. 3.1 subsequently, raghavulu and munusamy executed a settlement deed dated .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... view: - 19 - wp no.4385 of 2023 we also desire to warn ourselves against readily referring to english cases on questions of constitutional law, administrative law and public law as the law in india in these branches has forged ahead of the law in england, guided as we are by our constitution and uninhibited as we are by the technical rules which have hampered the development of the english law... .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
reportable2024insc28in the supreme court of india civil appellate jurisdiction civil appeal no.8185 of2009alagammal and ors. appellants versus ganesan and anr. respondents a1: alagammal a2: palaniammal a3: mariammal a4: pattayee ammal a5: karupparaj a6: lakshmi a7: thangam a8: maruthambal r1: ganesan r2: magudeeswari judgment ahsanuddin amanullah, j.heard learned counsel for the parties. 22. the present appeal is directed against the final judgment dated 28.04.2009 (hereinafter referred to as the impugned judgment ) passed by the madurai bench, madras high court (hereinafter referred to as the high court ) dismissing a second appeal [s.a. (md) no.1127 of 2008]. filed by the appellants/original defendants. brief facts:3. the appellants no.1, 2 and 3 entered into a registered agreement of sale (hereinafter referred to as the agreement ) with the respondents on 22.11.1990 to sell the suit property for a consideration of rs.21,000/-, against which rs.3000/- had been received in advance. further, six months time was fixed for completion of the transaction. the appellants no.1, 2 & 3, in the meantime, had executed a sale deed with regard to the property in question with appellant no.7 on 3 05.11.1997 for a consideration of rs.22,000/-. on 18.11.1997, the respondents sent a notice to the appellants calling upon them to execute the agreement. this led to the respondents filing of original suit no.165 of 1998 before the munsif, district court, dindigul against the appellants for .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... granted, it is the determination of the ultimate authority that the public welfare will be better served by inflicting less than what the judgment fixed (i) it was observed that the prerogative of mercy exercised by a state as a prerogative power of a crown as in england (u.k .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... phrase any one of them or any similar phrase consisting of any one , followed by of which is followed in its turn by words denoting a number of persons or things, does not appear to have fallen for judicial construction, in our courts or in england the phrase any of the present directors had to be interpreted in an old english case, isle of wight railway co. v. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 2024 insc26reportable in the supreme court of india civil original/inherent/extra-ordinary appellate jurisdiction writ petition (civil) no 643 of 2015 all india judges association petitioner versus union of india & ors respondents with special leave petition (civil) nos 6471-6473 of 2020, 29232 of 2018 and with contempt petition (civil) nos 711 of 2022, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40 of 2023, 848 of 2023 and 1338 of 2023 in writ petition (civil) no 643 of 2015 2 judgment dr dhananjaya y chandrachud, cji contents objections by the union government and state governments: ................................. 6 allowances recommended by the snjpc .................................................................... 13 1 house building advance (hba) ......................................................................... 13 2 children education allowance (cea) .............................................................. 15 3 city compensatory allowance (cca) ............................................................. 16 4 concurrent charges allowance ....................................................................... 17 5 conveyance/transport allowance (tp) ........................................................... 18 6 dearness allowance ........................................................................................... 20 7 earned leave encashment ................................................................................ 20 8 electricity and water charges .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi
- 1 - nc:2023. khc-k:9395 wp no.202928 of 2023 c/w wp no.203032 of 2023 in the high court of karnataka, r kalaburagi bench dated this the21t day of december, 2023 before the hon'ble mr. justice pradeep singh yerur writ petition no.202928 of2023(gm-res) c/w writ petition no.203032 of2023(gm-res) in wp no.202928/2023: between: shantreddy s/o.sharanappa malipatil aged about57years occ:advocate & government pleader r/at hosahalli village taluk & district yadgir585202 petitioner (by sri shivanand patil, advocate) and:1. the state of karnataka by the chief secretary government of karnataka vidhana soudha bengaluru-560 001 2. the department of law and parliamentary affairs vidhana soudha bengaluru-560 001 by its principal secretary/ under secretary - 2 - nc:2023. khc-k:9395 wp no.202928 of 2023 c/w wp no.203032 of 2023 3. the deputy commissioner yadagir-585 201 4. siddanoor ningappa aged about45years occ: advocate r/at bandalli village taluk & district yadgir - 585 202 respondents (by sri g.b.yadav, hcgp for r-1 to r-3; sri ganesh s.naik., advocate for r-4) this writ petition filed under articles226and227of the constitution of india praying to quash the order at part i and part2vide no.law-lad/231/2023 dated0710.2023 of respondent no.2 vide annexure c. in wp no.203032 of2023 between: smt.savithri d/o.shankar iti (walikar) aged about49years occ:advocate & asst.government pleader, indi r/at khb colony, plot no.16 vijayapura road, indi dist: vijayapura petitioner (by sri g.g. .....
Tag this Judgment!