Court : Supreme Court of India
reportable in the supreme court of india civil appellate jurisdiction civil appeal no.1843 of2021maharashtra state electricity distribution company limited ....appellant(s) versus maharashtra electricity regulatory commission & ors. . respondent(s) judgment indira banerjee, j.this appeal, under section 125 of the electricity act 2003, is against a judgment and order dated 27th april 2021 passed by the appellate tribunal for electricity, hereinafter referred to, in short, as aptel , dismissing appeal no.77 of 2018 filed by the appellant, maharashtra state electricity distribution company ltd., and affirming an order dated 16th november, 2017 passed by the maharashtra electricity regulatory commission, hereinafter referred to, in short, as merc , whereby merc dismissed the petition filed by the appellant under section 86 of the electricity act, being case no.24 of 2017, 1 rejecting the contention of the appellant that, introduction by reserve bank of india of the base rate system and the marginal cost of funds based lending rate system constituted a change in law, within the meaning of the expression change in law as defined in the respective power purchase agreements between the appellant and the respondent nos.2, 3, 4 and 5, hereinafter collectively referred to as the power generating companies , so as to alter the rate of late payment surcharge(lps) payable by the appellant to the power generating companies under the respective power purchase agreements.2. the appellant, .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... . fraud avoids all judicial acts, ecclesiastical or temporal observed chief justice edward coke of england about three 62 [(2003) 8 scc311: air2003sc4268 63 [(2004) 3 scc1: air2004sc2836 ) 64 [1929 ac482:1929 ..... . it is well settled that fraud avoids all judicial acts, ecclesiastical or temporal proclaimed chief justice edward coke of england about three centuries before ..... . (see halsbury's laws of england, vol .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... unless it is expressly shown to be so, while nothing is within page 13 of 77 the jurisdiction of an inferior court unless it is expressly shown on the face of the proceedings that the particular matter is within the cognizance of the particular court [halsbury's laws of england, vol. 9, p. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
1 r in the high court of karnataka at bengaluru dated this the7h day of october, 2021 before the hon ble mr. justice krishna s.dixit writ petition no.3002 of2015(gm-fc) between: ezazur rehman, s/o m.g.ghouse, aged about52years, residing at no.22, 6th cross, bhuvaneshwari nagar, bangalore 560 032. petitioner (by sri.k.n.haridasan nambiar, advocate) and: smt. saira banu, d/o not known, aged about42years, residing at no.214, 2nd floor, thimmaiah road, opp. chitra bakery & axis bank atm, shivajinagar, bangalore 560 051. respondent (by smt. rashmi c, advocate) this writ petition is filed under articles226& 227 of the constitution of india praying to quash the impugned order on i.a.no.10 passed by the learned i addl. principal family court at bangalore in ex.no.155/2011 on its file dated2211.2014 as per annex-f and be pleased to pass suitable other order/s deemed fit under the circumstances. this petition coming on for preliminary hearing in b group this day, the court made the following:- 2 order this is yet another case of a hapless muslim divorced wife battling for two decades for executing a maintenance decree; this again reminds of what the privy council lamented more than a century & a half ago about the difficulty a decree holder faces in the execution proceedings in the general manager of the raj durbhanga vs. maharajah coomar ramaput singh, moore s indian appeals (1871-72), vol.14, page605 it is worth mentioning: these proceedings certainly illustrate what was said by mr. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
1 r in the high court of karnataka, bengaluru dated this the1t day of october, 2021 before the hon'ble mr. justice krishna s.dixit writ petition no.733/2021 (gm-wakf) c/w writ petition nos.701/2021, 713/2021, 754/2021, 760/2021, 776/2021(gm-wakf) in w.p.no.733/2021: between: smt. shanaz begum, (dead) her lrs son, sri.shabbir ahmed, s/o naser shariff aged about47years, shop no.01, a block, rifah complex, sayaji road, mandi mhalla, mysuru disrict, mysuru 560 001. petitioner (by sri. mohammed tahir, advocate) and:1. the muslim boys orphanage, sayajji road, mandi mohalla, mysuru district, mysuru, through its secretary 560 001.2. the competent officer and chief executive officer, karnataka state board of auqaf, bengaluru 560 052. respondents (by smt. s.r.anuradha, advocate for r2; r2 served and unrepresented) this writ petition is filed under articles226and227of the constitution of india praying to issue writ of certiorari against r-2 and consequently declare the proceeding adjudicated by r-2 null and void2in w.p.no.701/2021: between: sri. dilip kumar ghera, s/o leela ram, aged about66years shop no.04, a block, rifah complex, sayaji road, mandi mohalla, mysuru district, mysuru - 560 001. (benefit of senior citizen not claimed) petitioner (by sri. mohammed tahir, advocate) and:1. the muslim boys orphanage, sayajji road, mandi mohalla, mysuru district, mysuru 560 001. through its secretary.2. the competent officer and chief executive officer, karnataka state board of auqaf, .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
1 r in the high court of karnataka, bengaluru dated this the1t day of october, 2021 before the hon'ble mr. justice krishna s.dixit writ petition no.733/2021 (gm-wakf) c/w writ petition nos.701/2021, 713/2021, 754/2021, 760/2021, 776/2021(gm-wakf) in w.p.no.733/2021: between: smt. shanaz begum, (dead) her lrs son, sri.shabbir ahmed, s/o naser shariff aged about47years, shop no.01, a block, rifah complex, sayaji road, mandi mhalla, mysuru disrict, mysuru 560 001. petitioner (by sri. mohammed tahir, advocate) and:1. the muslim boys orphanage, sayajji road, mandi mohalla, mysuru district, mysuru, through its secretary 560 001.2. the competent officer and chief executive officer, karnataka state board of auqaf, bengaluru 560 052. respondents (by smt. s.r.anuradha, advocate for r2; r2 served and unrepresented) this writ petition is filed under articles226and227of the constitution of india praying to issue writ of certiorari against r-2 and consequently declare the proceeding adjudicated by r-2 null and void2in w.p.no.701/2021: between: sri. dilip kumar ghera, s/o leela ram, aged about66years shop no.04, a block, rifah complex, sayaji road, mandi mohalla, mysuru district, mysuru - 560 001. (benefit of senior citizen not claimed) petitioner (by sri. mohammed tahir, advocate) and:1. the muslim boys orphanage, sayajji road, mandi mohalla, mysuru district, mysuru 560 001. through its secretary.2. the competent officer and chief executive officer, karnataka state board of auqaf, .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
1 r in the high court of karnataka, bengaluru dated this the1t day of october, 2021 before the hon'ble mr. justice krishna s.dixit writ petition no.733/2021 (gm-wakf) c/w writ petition nos.701/2021, 713/2021, 754/2021, 760/2021, 776/2021(gm-wakf) in w.p.no.733/2021: between: smt. shanaz begum, (dead) her lrs son, sri.shabbir ahmed, s/o naser shariff aged about47years, shop no.01, a block, rifah complex, sayaji road, mandi mhalla, mysuru disrict, mysuru 560 001. petitioner (by sri. mohammed tahir, advocate) and:1. the muslim boys orphanage, sayajji road, mandi mohalla, mysuru district, mysuru, through its secretary 560 001.2. the competent officer and chief executive officer, karnataka state board of auqaf, bengaluru 560 052. respondents (by smt. s.r.anuradha, advocate for r2; r2 served and unrepresented) this writ petition is filed under articles226and227of the constitution of india praying to issue writ of certiorari against r-2 and consequently declare the proceeding adjudicated by r-2 null and void2in w.p.no.701/2021: between: sri. dilip kumar ghera, s/o leela ram, aged about66years shop no.04, a block, rifah complex, sayaji road, mandi mohalla, mysuru district, mysuru - 560 001. (benefit of senior citizen not claimed) petitioner (by sri. mohammed tahir, advocate) and:1. the muslim boys orphanage, sayajji road, mandi mohalla, mysuru district, mysuru 560 001. through its secretary.2. the competent officer and chief executive officer, karnataka state board of auqaf, .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
1 r in the high court of karnataka, bengaluru dated this the1t day of october, 2021 before the hon'ble mr. justice krishna s.dixit writ petition no.733/2021 (gm-wakf) c/w writ petition nos.701/2021, 713/2021, 754/2021, 760/2021, 776/2021(gm-wakf) in w.p.no.733/2021: between: smt. shanaz begum, (dead) her lrs son, sri.shabbir ahmed, s/o naser shariff aged about47years, shop no.01, a block, rifah complex, sayaji road, mandi mhalla, mysuru disrict, mysuru 560 001. petitioner (by sri. mohammed tahir, advocate) and:1. the muslim boys orphanage, sayajji road, mandi mohalla, mysuru district, mysuru, through its secretary 560 001.2. the competent officer and chief executive officer, karnataka state board of auqaf, bengaluru 560 052. respondents (by smt. s.r.anuradha, advocate for r2; r2 served and unrepresented) this writ petition is filed under articles226and227of the constitution of india praying to issue writ of certiorari against r-2 and consequently declare the proceeding adjudicated by r-2 null and void2in w.p.no.701/2021: between: sri. dilip kumar ghera, s/o leela ram, aged about66years shop no.04, a block, rifah complex, sayaji road, mandi mohalla, mysuru district, mysuru - 560 001. (benefit of senior citizen not claimed) petitioner (by sri. mohammed tahir, advocate) and:1. the muslim boys orphanage, sayajji road, mandi mohalla, mysuru district, mysuru 560 001. through its secretary.2. the competent officer and chief executive officer, karnataka state board of auqaf, .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... . 657-58) the content and purport of the expressions having regard to and shall have regard to have been the subject matter of consideration in various decisions of the courts in england as also in this country .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... 51. in england, the courts have not recognised a general duty on the part of the administrator to perform administrative functions to give reasons .....
Tag this Judgment!