Current - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: current Court: mumbai Year: 1982 Page 1 of about 300 results (0.046 seconds)Gajaraben Prakashchand Mehta Vs. Ratilal Phulchand Mehta
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Mar-12-1982
Reported in : 1983(1)BomCR151
sharad manohar j 1 this is a writ petition filed by the original plaintiff landlady whose suit for recovery of...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTFavre-leuba and Co. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Bombay City-i
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Jun-24-1982
Reported in : (1983)36CTR(Bom)388; [1983]141ITR494(Bom); [1983]14TAXMAN65(Bom)
..... the initial contribution was not to be made out of the current year s profits but provision was already made out of the ..... and declaring some dividend some residue was left over from the current years income was not challenged the tribunal having dismissed the appeal ..... the initial contribution was not required to be made out of current year s profits but provision has already been made in the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTIn Re: Ipco Paper Mills Ltd.
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Feb-24-1982
Reported in : [1984]55CompCas281(Bom)
..... next following in any one or more of the following methods namely a in a current or other deposit account with any scheduled bank free from charge of lien b in .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTScIndia Employees Union and Others Vs. ScIndia Steam Navigation Co. Lt ...
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Jan-25-1982
Reported in : [1982(45)FLR420]; (1983)ILLJ347Bom
..... paid more by way of enhanced dividend irrespective of whether it is justified by the current year s profits the employees would get more by way of bonus however even when ..... it is linked to dividend would be less than it would be justified by the current year s profit the formula is based in my opinion on totally different considerations than .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTController of Estate Duty Vs. Mohamed Habib A. Valiwalla
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Jul-20-1982
Reported in : [1982]137ITR677(Bom)
..... debit entry in the account of the deceased these amounts were later transferred to the current account of the firm no interest was however paid by the firm on these accounts ..... from the findings recorded by the tribunal that the respective amounts were transferred to the current accounts of the donees with the firm the mere fact that the donor was a .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSheshroa Bhauro Jadhav Vs. Commissioner, Aurangabad Division and ors.
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Mar-08-1982
Reported in : AIR1985Bom256; 1982(2)BomCR489; (1982)84BOMLR156
..... is equally fallacious to assume that the commissioner is under any obligation to ascertain the current views of the panchayat on the date of his decision to make the consultation effective ..... initiative or in response to query by the commissioner cease to be valid effective and current it is not possible to trace any basis for any such assumption this would indeed .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTController of Estate Duty, Bombay City Vs. Mohammed Habib A. Valiwalla
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Mar-20-1982
Reported in : [1981]132ITR414a(Bom)
..... debit entry in the account of the deceased these amounts were later transferred to the current account of the firm no interest however paid by the firm on these accounts presumably ..... from the findings recorded by the tribunal that the respective amounts were transferred to the current accounts of the donees with the firm the mere fact that the donor was a .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJanardan Mahadev Dhuru and ors. Vs. Vijaynath Moreshwar Dhuru and ors.
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Mar-09-1982
Reported in : AIR1982Bom274; (1982)84BOMLR331; 1982MhLJ545
..... with ss 2 and 3 of the partition act and found that there was no current of decisions which compelled it to hold that there was an inherent power in the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTTradesvel Security Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Maharashtra
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Nov-02-1982
Reported in : (1982)84BOMLR608
..... guard directly a registered employer is further required to submit all available information of his current and future requirements of security guards he is also required to disburse to the security .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState of Maharashtra and A.R. Antulay Vs. Padmakar Balkrishna Samant
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Jun-10-1982
Reported in : (1982)84BOMLR427
..... the quantity involved in such allotment is 132q m t since no stocks from the current quarter s quota was available the regional cement controller have been asked to treat the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT