Skip to content


Constitution Of India Article 4 - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: constitution of india article 4 Court: central administrative tribunal cat ernakulam Year: 2006 Page 1 of about 12 results (2.087 seconds)
Sep 01 2006 (TRI)

Subir Kumar Vs. Government of India and ors.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam

Decided on : Sep-01-2006

Reported in : (2007)(2)SLJ172CAT

..... authority was exercising its statutory power and not the executive power vested under article 73 of the constitution of india the under secretary was not even competent to authenticate the orders issued by ..... therefore there was no question of re opening the closed matters through the annexure a 4 memorandum dated 21 5 02 after consideration of the written statement the disciplinary authority has .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 09 2006 (TRI)

S. Soundara Raj Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam

Decided on : Mar-09-2006

Reported in : (2007)(1)SLJ360CAT

..... the office memorandum dated may 29 1986 and mentioned above are violative of articles 14 and 16 of the constitution and hence those words have been quashed from that memorandum the implications ..... instructions are issued in consultation with the comptroller and auditor general of india however these orders in keeping with paragraph 4 of the office memorandum dated may 29 1986 as referred to .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 23 2006 (TRI)

Tom Joseph Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam

Decided on : Jan-23-2006

Reported in : (2006)(3)SLJ274CAT

..... to the vice of arbitrariness which is the crux of article 14 of the constitution and basic to the rule of law the system which ..... to ensure the majesty of rule of law guaranteed by the constitution of india it is therefore obvious that irrespective of the nature of appointment ..... rejected by the respondents way back on 14 4 2005 shiv sugar tiwari v union of india and ors air 1997 sc 2726 had come .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 18 2006 (TRI)

P.K. Kasali Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam

Decided on : Sep-18-2006

Reported in : (2007)(2)SLJ210CAT

..... the principles of natural justice and hence violative of the constitutional guarantees under articles 14 and 16 ii the entire proceedings initiated against the ..... of dismissal from service vide f no 1 4 2000 ip amp t dated 4 4 2001 issued by the second respondent vide annexure ..... for the applicant central bank of india ltd v prakash chand jain pararam chander v union of india and ors paras v ministry of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 17 2006 (TRI)

R. Parameswaran Pillai Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam

Decided on : Mar-17-2006

Reported in : (2007)(1)SLJ82CAT

..... violative of the rights guaranteed under articles 14 15 21 and 311 of the constitution of india the entire proceedings are ab initio ..... authority s finding inviting his representation or submission if any 4 after a thorough and detailed examination of both prosecution and ..... discretionary power the two classes are not however mutually exclusive iv the last contention on behalf of the applicants is that .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 22 2006 (TRI)

R. Karunakaran Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam

Decided on : Mar-22-2006

Reported in : (2007)(1)SLJ249CAT

..... applicants according to the impugned order a committee constituted by the drm visited the respective quarters and ..... supreme court has held as under because after article 14 has spread its wing in the field ..... as under a k kraipak v union of india one golden rule that stands firmly established is ..... of disciplinary proceedings on the very same grounds 4 the respondents have filed their reply justifying their .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 22 2006 (TRI)

C.T. Abraham Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam

Decided on : Sep-22-2006

Reported in : (2007)(1)SLJ298CAT

..... general who appeared for the respondent state that the provision in article 310 1 of the constitution that members of a civil service of a state hold ..... court in h l mehra v union of india the said principle stands modified by sub rules 3 and 4 of rule 10 of the rules in ..... in nelson motis v union of india has noticed this difference between language used in sub rules 3 and 4 and has held scc p 716 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 03 2006 (TRI)

V. Gopalakrishnan Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam

Decided on : Feb-03-2006

Reported in : (2006)(3)SLJ90CAT

is integral to right to life and it is the constitutional obligation of the government to provide health facilities there cannot bench of the cat in r rangarajan v union of india in o a no 194 01 as also by ahmedabad supreme court in state of punjab v mohinder singh chawla 4 it is contended for the appellants state that the government

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 01 2006 (TRI)

K.V. Joshy Vs. the Commissioner of Central

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam

Decided on : Mar-01-2006

Reported in : (2007)(1)SLJ269CAT

may pass laws with retrospective effect subject to the recognized constitutional limitations but it is equally well settled that no retrospective recommendation of the 5th central pay commission the government of india issued the assured career progression scheme for the central government when the draft recruitment rules were in existence as on 4 1 99 and denying the same to the applicant on

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 23 2006 (TRI)

K. Ramachandran Pillai and ors. Vs. Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan and

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam

Decided on : Jan-23-2006

Reported in : (2006)(3)SLJ1CAT

easy instalments shyam babu verma and ors v union of india and ors considered the question of recovery of amount of lapse of years in the pay scale of rs 260 400 shall be recovered by the respondents 19 the madras bench

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //