Constitution Of India Article 4 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: constitution of india article 4 Court: central administrative tribunal cat delhi Year: 2010 Page 1 of about 11 results (1.361 seconds)Ms. Preeta Vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi Through Its Commissioner ...
Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi
Decided on : Aug-25-2010
..... facts and circumstances the court was not inclined to exercise its jurisdiction under article 226 of the constitution of india for quashing the orders of the tribunal in the challenged cases 8 on ..... submission of the obc certificate and the implications of non adherence to these conditions para 4 further the ground of discrimination and injustice to those candidates who had not submitted their .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTYogendra Pal Singh Vs. the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Nct of Delhi and ...
Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi
Decided on : Aug-25-2010
extends to whole of india it would not affect the constitutional jurisdiction of the high court of jandk in entertaining the age of 62 years or till clearance from government of india for extending retirement age is received whichever is earlier the for the respondents placed reliance on the judgment dated 17 4 1986 passed in t 171 85 cw no 1537 74
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTC.L. Verma Vs. Union of India Through the Secretary, Government of Ind ...
Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi
Decided on : Aug-31-2010
appeal to the disciplinary authority 8221 12 in union of india vs k d pandey and another reported in 2003 scc was issued to the applicant with the following charges 8220 article i shri c l verma while functioning as dy manager de novo enquiry therefore this order is bad in law 4 respondents on the other hand have stated that the io
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTC.L. Verma Vs. Union of India Through the Secretary, Government of Ind ...
Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi
Decided on : Aug-31-2010
rules 1964 sumati kumar deputy secretary to the government of india 3 the charges were denied by the applicant however an 2008 was issued to the applicant with the following charges article i shri c l verma while functioning as dy manager de novo enquiry therefore this order is bad in law 4 respondents on the other hand have stated that the io
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTishwar Singh Vs. Union of India and Others
Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi
Decided on : Aug-19-2010
by the hon 8217 ble supreme court in union of india and another vs m k sarkar reported in 2010 2 in pay by six steps from rs 5500 to rs 4750 in same scale of rs 4500 7000 for three years
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTArun Kumar Vs. Union of India Through the General Manager, Northern Ra ...
Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi
Decided on : Aug-19-2010
kumar sinha and 148 2008 dlt 433 db union of india and ors vs t p venugopal 4 counsel for the 95 was served on the applicant with the following allegations articles of charge i on 24 11 1994 25 11 95 held it is a case of no evidence orders dated 4 2 2008 28 4 2009 and 5 10 2009 are
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSh. S.K. Chopra and Others Vs. Union of India and Others
Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi
Decided on : Sep-01-2010
could not be implemented so far would not by itself constitute sufficient reason there is an objective based on considerations of respondents has vehemently argued that the applicants have an all india transfer liability being group b officers the policy in respect should not be relieved as the transfer order dated 4 4 2007 has been stayed on 16 4 2007 no costs
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTV.P.S. Chaudhary Vs. Shri Rakesh Mehta Chief Secretary and Others
Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi
Decided on : Aug-31-2010
against the memorandum dated 18 12 2009 under rule 14 4 of the ccs cca rules 1972 therefore we do not
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSadanand Sharma Vs. Union of India Through the General Manager and Oth ...
Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi
Decided on : Aug-30-2010
6500 10500 w e f 23 11 1997 3 railway board issued restructuring orders on 10 5 1998 whereby 3 additional promoted as cos vide order dated 20 10 2004 page 46 if applicant was aggrieved by the promotion of shri b
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTShri Shiv Sagar Naik Vs. Union of India Through Secretary and Another
Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi
Decided on : Aug-25-2010
vigilance case under investigation in january 2006 the government of india issued an order granting non functional scale of rs 80000 under suspension and later he was dismissed from service on 4 8 2005 and hence the benefit of pay revision or
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT