Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : 1982WLN358
G.M. Lodha, J.1. As the stenographers are on strike, the judgment in these bunch of 31 writ petitions is being dictated on dictaphone.2. This is a bunch of 31 writ petitions filed by unsuccessful candidates who applied for being selected as Lecturers in the various departments of the Govt. Colleges of Rajasthan. The petitioners can safely be categorised in two categories. Category A denotes to those petitioners who are not only Post graduates but have got further qualifications of Ph. D. or M. Phil/M Litt. These petitioners who have obtained the decree of M Phil/M.Litt. or who have done Ph D., all fall in one category which may be for the sake of convenience treated as category 'A'. The other petitioners who have not qualified themselves by having the degree of doctorate that is Ph.D. or M.Phil/M.Litt. falls in category 'B'.3. The advertisement which was issued by the Rajasthan Public Service Commission for inviting applications for the post of lecturers in the various departments cont...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : 2005(103)ECC152; 2005(186)ELT3(Raj)
ORDERRajesh Balia, J.1. The petitioner is a limited Company incorporated under the provisions of Companies Act, 1956. Amongst others, the petitioner Company is engaged in the business of manufacture of tyres for which it has its manufacturing facility at Kankroli, Rajasthan. For the purposes of its manufacturing in Rajasthan of such tyres, the petitioner imports Nylon Tyre Cord Fabric (NTCF) from various manufacturers/exporters of other countries including from those situated in Peoples Republic of China. The NTCF so imported is comprised of three different varieties namely, the grey fabric, dipped fabric and Cycle Tyre Cord Fabric (CTC). The petitioner is also a member of Automotive Tyre Manufacturer Association (ATMA). The association represents the collective interest of tyre manufacturers.2. The Association of Synthetic Fibre Industry (ASFI), whose members are the manufacturers of synthetic fibre in India, including NTCF, submitted a written application before the Designated Author...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : AIR1954Raj291
Wanchoo, C.J.1. These are 210 applications under Article 226 of the Constitution, challenging the validity of the Rajasthan Land Reforms and Resumption of Jagirs Act, (No. 6) of 1952 as amended by The Rajasthan Land Reforms and Resumption of Jagirs (Amendment) Act (No. 13) of 1954 (hereinafter to be referred together as the Act). We propose to deal with them by one judgment as the points raised in these cases are common.2. The cases may be divided into two broad groups. The first group consists of what may be called ordinary jagirdari cases. The rights of the applicants in these cases arise from grants by the Rulers of the covenanting States. The second group of cases are Bhomichara and Bhomat cases, and it is said that the rights of the applicants in these cases did not arise out of any grant by the Rulers.3. We do not think it necessary to set out the allegations in the various applications in detail. It would, in our opinion, be enough to indicate the points on the basis of which th...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : AIR1961Raj98
Dave, J.1. These are 3 writ applications under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the validity of temporary permits granted by the Regional Transport Authority Jaipur by its resolutions Nos. 222 and 223 dated the 25th June, 1960. Although the temporary permits have been granted on different routes to different persons, common questions of law are involved! in these applications and therefore they are disposed of together.2. In order to appreciate the points canvassed before us, it would be proper to state briefly the foots which have given rise to these applications:3. Writ Applications Nos. 216 and 217 are in respect of the permits granted for Jaipur Kishangarh route. The petitioners in writ application No. 216 are bus operators holding non-temporary permits and they are plying their buses on Jaipur Kishangarh Ajmer route. The Jaipur Kishangarh route overlaps Jaipur Ajmer route upto Kishangarh. These petitioners were granted permits by the Regional Transport Authorit...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : [1969]23STC262(Raj)
C.M. Lodha, J.1. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the assessment orders passed against the petitioner on 18th February, 1965, in respect of the assessment years 1963-64 and 1964-65 on the ground that the sales tax assessed on the sale of imported 'bardana' is invalid.2. The petitioner is a registered partnership firm carrying on the business of commission agent for the sale of gunny bags which come under the category of 'bardana'. Under Section 4(2) of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954, The Government of Rajasthan issued a notification which runs as follows:-Excise & Taxation Department Notification, Jaipur, August 11, 1959. No. F-5 {139) E. & T./57.-In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (2) of Section 4 of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954 (Act No. 29 of 1954) and in supersession of this department notification No. F. 5 (139) E. & T./57, dated the 19th December, 1958, the State Government being of the opinion that it...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : AIR1972Raj74
Kan Singh, J. 1. I have before me two appeals concerning the validity of an election to the Municipal Council of Bikaner held on 25-10-70 from Ward No. 31. 2. The counting of votes took place on 26-10-1970. In all 1441 votes were cast. Out of them 139 votes had been rejected by the Returning Officer; some were rejected because there were more than one seal impressions and others were rejected as there were other ink marks on them, or for the reason that the ballot papers had no seal marks altogether. Shri Vasudeo was found to have secured 524 valid votes, while Shri Ramkishan was found to have secured 493 valid votes. Accordingly. Shri Vasudeo was declared elected. 3. In November. 1970 Shri Ramkishan filed an election petition challenging the election of Shri Vasudeo before the Dist. Judge of Bikaner who subsequently transferred it to the Senior Civil Judge at Bikaner. The two-fold prayer was made in the election petition. In the first instance, it was pray-ed that the election of Shri...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : 1971WLN510
Kan Singh, J.1. I have before me two appeals concerning the validity of an election to the Municipal Council of Bikaner held on 25-10-70 from Ward No. 31.2. The counting of votes took place on 26-10-70. In all 1441 votes were cast Out of them 139 votes had been rejected by the Returning Officer; some were rejected because there were more than one seal impressions and others were rejected as there were other ink marks on them, or for the reason that the ballot papers had no seal marks altogether. Shri Vasudeo was found to have secured 524 valid votes, while Shri Ramkishan was found to have secured 493 valid votes. Accordingly, Shri Vasudeo was declared elected.3. In November, 1970 Shri Ramkishan filed an election petition challenging the election of Shri Vasudeo before the District Judge of Bikaner who subsequently transferred it to the Senior Civil Judge at Bikaner. The twofold prayer was made in the election petition. In the first instance, it was prayed that the election of Shri Vasu...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : 1974WLN986
Kan Singh, J.1. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution filed by one Dr. D.C. Jain questioning the validity of a resolution of the Syndicate of the jodhpur University No. 174 dated 21/22/23rd November, 1973 and seeking an appropriate writ, direction or order.2. The writ petition is a sequel to an earlier writ petition filed by Dr D.C. Jam No. 723 of 1973 against the University and Shri S.C. Thanvi, respondent No. 2, for a writ of quo warranto. There was a stay application moved in that writ petition by the petitioner Dr. D.C. Jain restraining the University from continuing Shri S.C. Thanvi as Professor and Dean in the Faculty of Law after his retirement on 9-10-74 The University opposed the stay application and in its reply to that stay application took the stand that in view of the aforesaid resolution of the Syndicate there would be no need to pass any order for continuing Shri S.C. Thanvi as Professor in the Faculty of Law, but in terms of the resolution there ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : 1977WLN(UC)413
M.L. Jain, J.1. The facts of this writ petition are that M/s Bikaner Clays & Chemicals, Bikaner respondent No 3 made an application on 8-1-1970 for mining lease for red ochre and fire clay in an area of 412 hectares near village Indokabala, District Bikaner. Since in the same land, one Shri A M Bengani had applied on 14-8-68 for mining lease for Fuller's earth in an area of 412 79 hectares, the Assistant Mining Fighter, Bikarer, by his letter dated 30.1.70 in formed the respondent No 3 that the area applied for by them conflicts with some sanctioned and applied for area and as such the fire area is only 342-35 hectares He enclosed a report in 5 copies for signatures of the respondent No 3 and return within 3 days Ore more letter was issued by the Assistant Mining Engineer Bilarer on 19- 11-1970 saying that as a matter of fact, the free an a was only 252 52 acres Ir reply to this letter, the respondent No 3 wrote to the Astistant Marirg Frgireer Rlaner that they had accepted and desinge...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : AIR1978Raj72
A.P. Sen, J. 1. This writ petition has been referred to a Full Bench at the instance of the State Government because it involves a question as to the validity of the appointment of Shri Raghukul Tilak as Governor of Rajasthan.2. The relevant facts giving rise to the writ petition, shortly stated, are that during the period of Emergency, the petitioner, who holds a substantive rank of a Reader in Political Science in University of Rajasthan, was appointed as Officiating Director, Institute of Correspondence Studies, on Sept. 29, 1975 by the then Vice-Chancellor Dr. G.C. Pande, respondent No. 2. His services were placed on deputation from the Department of Political Science and in due course the post was advertised. On the recommendation of the Selection Committee constituted for the purpose, which was duly approved by the Syndicate, the petitioner was appointed as Director, Institute of Correspondence Studies, on probation, for a period of one year in the pay-scale of Professor in the U...
Tag this Judgment!