Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: constitution of india article 139 conferment on the supreme court of powers to issue certain writs Sorted by: old Court: mumbai aurangabad Page 1 of about 2 results (0.138 seconds)

Feb 08 2013 (HC)

Jagannath S/O Anna Khakare and Others Vs. the State of Maharashtra, Th ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

R.M. Borde, J. 1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally by consent of learned Counsel for respective parties. 2.Petitioners in all these petitions are prospective applicants who are desirous of participating in the process initiated by Respondent-Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd., for making appointment to the post of Electrical Assistant (Vidyut Sahayyak). Petitioners are seeking direction to the Respondent-Company to provide maximum age relaxation up to 45 years to the petitioners belonging to Project/Earthquake Affected Persons category in the advertisement no.1/2012 published on 08.06.2012. It is also prayed to declare that petitioners belonging to age group of 18 to 45 years are qualified and entitled to apply for the post of Electrical Assistant and to direct the Respondent-Company to consider candidature of petitioners for the said post. Petitioners are also seeking to quash advertisement no.1/2012 being in contravention of Government Resol...

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 17 2014 (HC)

The State of Maharashtra and Others Vs. Yuvraj and Others

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

S.S. Shinde, J. 1. In Sessions Case No.100 of 2012 the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Jalgaon has awarded death sentence to the accused no.1 therein, the proceedings in the said case, have been therefore forwarded to this Court for confirmation under section 366 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The accused no.1-Yuvraj Kashinath Sabale and accused no.2- Pankaj Maruti Sandanshiv have also preferred an appeal, which was admitted by this Court and same is registered as Criminal Appeal No. 29 of 2014. So also accused no.3Maheshkumar Rameshchandra Varma has also preferred an appeal, which was admitted by this Court and same is registered as Criminal Appeal No.21 of 2014. As all the matters are arising out of onejudgment, the arguments in these matters are simultaneously heard and we find it expedient to decide all these cases by common judgment. However, since the very conviction has been challenged by the convicts, the only proper course would be to first decide the Criminal Appeals so f...

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //