Court : Andhra Pradesh
THE HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SRI PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT APPEAL NO.893 OF 201.12-9-2012 M/s. India Finlease Securities Limited,Chennai, Rep. by its Authorized Signatory Sri P.D. Prasad Indian Overseas Bank Represented by its Branch Manager Andhra Loyola College Branch, Vijaywada Krishna District and others COUNSEL FOR PETITIONER: Sri D. Prakash Reddy, Senior Counsel, appeared for Sri C. Ramachandra Raju COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT NOs.1 AND 2.Sri A. Krishnam Raju COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT NO.3: Sri B. Adinarayana Rao, appeared for Sri Challa Gunaranjan GIST HEAD NOTE: CITATIONS:1. (1977) 3 SCC 24.2. (2004) 4 SCC 31.3. (2007) 5 SCC 74.4. (1991) 3 SCC 58.5. AIR 200.Madras 108(1) 6. 2005 Company Cases Vol.125, P.676 7. (2010) 8 SCC 11.8. AIR 195.SC 37.JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon'ble the Acting Chief Justice) Whether under sub-section (8) of Section 13 of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Inte...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN COMPANY APPEAL No.10 OF 201.23-04-2013 Manoj Kumar Kanuga and 3 others Marudhar Power Pvt. Ltd and 18 others Counsel for the appellants: Mrs. Sangeeta Bhaskar Counsel for the respondents:Sri Ch. Ramesh babu Sri Prabhakar Sripada, Sri S. Siva Shanker, Sri K. Surender : CITATIONS:1. AIR 196.SC 163.2) (2005) 127 Comp Cas 336 (AP-DB) 3) (1999) Vol.35 CLA 9.(DB) 4) (1969) 72 ITR 40.(SC) 5) AIR 195.SC 42.6) AIR 196.SC 10.7) (2012) 4 SCALE 17 8) CO.A. (SB) 9/2011, dated 20.04.2011 (Delhi High Court) 9) (2008) 3 SCC 36.10) AIR 196.SC 115.11) AIR 195.SC 55.12) (2011) 101 CLA 34.(Mad 13) AIR 195.SC 5.14) AIR 197.SC 159.15) [1957] 31 ITR 2.(SC) 16) (1998) 92 Comp Cas 910 (Guj) 17) AIR 199.Delhi 51 (FB) 18) (AIR 196.P & H 4.19) AIR 195.Ca20. (1973) 43 Comp Cas 189 (Del-DB) 21) AIR 197.Del 302 (DB) 22) (1983) 54 Comp Cas 301 (DEL) 23) (1989) 66 Comp Cas 684 (All-DB) 24) (1963) 33 Comp Cas 826) (Bom) 25) (1999) 98 Comp.Cas.806 (AP) 26) AIR 199.SC 315.27...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION No. 27777 OF 201.and batch 20-08-2013 Joseph Sriharsha and Mary Indraja Educational Society (Regn No.662/1996) Plot No.102,High Court Colony, Vanasthalipuram,Hyderabad Rep. by its Secretary Rev. KVK Rao and others......... Petitioners The State of A.P. Rep. by its Principal Secretary to Government, Higher Education (EC.2) Department, Hyderabad...... Respondents Counsel for the petitioners: Sri P. Sri Raghuram Counsel for respondent No.1: G.P. for Higher Education Counsel for Respondent No.2: Sri C. Sudesh Anand (SC for APSCHE) : ?Cases Referred:1. (2005) 6 SCC 53.2. 2008 (3) ALD 10.(DB) 3. AIR 195.SC 11.4. (2001) 2 SCC 38.5. (2013) 3 SCC 38.6. (2002) 8 SCC 48.7. (2009) 7 SCC 75.8. (1992) 1 SCC 55.9. (2012) 4 SCC 65.WRIT PETITION No. 27777, 27898, 27918, 28014, 28023, 28055, 28060, 28073, 28098, 28108, 28116, 28125, 28130, 28134, 28139, 28206, 28249, 28260, 28321, 28356, 28399, 28404, ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO WRIT PETITION Nos.7446 of 2013 and 20965 of 2013 Dated 06-11-2013 WP. No.7446 of 2013 Bharaju Rambabu S/o Bhaskara Rao, Driver of Ambulance Van Government Area Hospital, Gudivada R/o GVR Complex, Eluru Road, Gudivada, Krishna District and another ....Petitioners The State of Andhra Pradesh Rep by its Secretary Legislative Affairs & Justice Secretariat, Hyderabad and 3 others....Respondents Counsel for the petitioners: Sri Narasimha Rao Gudiseva Counsel for the respondents :1. GP for Home 2. Sri K. Chidambaram WP. No.20965 of 2013 HEAD NOTE: ?.Cases referred 1. 2009 (2) ALD (Cri) 300 2. 2008 (1) ALD (Crl.) 712 (A.P.) 3. 1988 (3) SCC1444. 2002 Crl.L.J.1694 5. 2001 Crl.L.J.912 6. 2004 (1) ALD (Crl.) 43 7. 2003 (7) SCC4038. AIR1959AP6599. 1986 (1) ALT14110. 1999 (2) ALD (Crl.) 621 (SC) 11. 2004 Crl.L.J.52 12. 2009 (12) SCC159 13. 2006 Crl.L.J425814. 1999 Supreme Court Cases (Crl) 1277 15. (2010) 6 SCC116. (2004) 4 SCC15817. AIR2004SC380018. ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU W.P.No.9070 of 2008 03-02-2014 V.Ravichandra..... PETITIONER Indian Bank, rep. by its General Manager/Appellate Authority for Award Staff,HRM Department, H.O.66, Rajaji Salai,Chennai - 600 001 and others.....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the petitioner: Sri V.Ravichandra, Party in person Counsel for respondents: Sri Ambadipudi Satyanarayana : ?.Cases referred:1. (1986) 3 SCC4542. AIR1993SC11973. (1991) 3 SCC2194. (1995) 6 SCC7495. (2006) 5 SCC886. (2006) 4 SCC7137. AIR1993SC11978. (2011) 7 SCC3259. (2010) 5 SCC77510. AIR2009SC16111. (2005) 10 SCC8412. (2000) 1 SCC41613. AIR2007SC19914. (2006) 2 SCC255HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU WRIT PETITION No.9070 of 2008 ORDER: The petitioner, an employee of the respondent Bank, having been removed from service on an allegation of misconduct, laid challenge against the said dismissal in the present writ petition. The facts in brief are as follows: The petitioner, when working as a Clerk/Shroff in one...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
THE HONBLE SRI JUSTICE DILIP B.BHOSALE AND THE HONBLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAMALINGESWARA RAO WRIT PETITION No.29925 OF201215-04-2015 Rastriya Ispat Nigam Limited Petitioner Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax & another Respondents. Counsel for Petitioner :Ch.Pushyam Kiran Counsel for Respondents:B.Narasimha Sarma ?. Cases referred:1) AIR1995SC1133= (1995) 212 ITR639(SC) 2) AIR2007SC30053) 252 ITR2604) 231 ITR505) AIR1975SC16046) AIR1977SC8707) AIR1973SC22668) 198 ITR2979) AIR1987Supreme Court 793 THE HONBLE SRI JUSTICE DILIP B.BHOSALE AND THE HONBLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAMALINGESWARA RAO WRIT PETITION No.29925 of 2012 ORAL ORDER: (per the Honble Sri Justice Dilip B.Bhosale) This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India impugns a notice issued by the 1st respondent-Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax under Section 154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short the Act) on 31.08.2012, proposing to rectify the concluded assessment for the Assessment Year 2005-06, as illegal, arbitrary a...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE S.V.BHATT WRIT PETITION Nos.24587 OF201401-06-2015 C.Radhakrishnama Naidu and others...Petitioners The Government of Andhra Pradesh,rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue(Registration)Department,Secretariat, Hyderabad, and others...Respondents Counsel for PetitioneRs.Sr.Kambhampati Ramesh Babu Sr.S.Rama Moorthy Reddy Sr.A.Giridhar Rao Sr.M.V.Pratap Reddy Sr.A.Chandraiah Naidu Sr.P.Lakshma Reddy Sr.Ch.Venkat Raman Counsel for Respondents: G.P.for Revenue(AP) G.P.for Endowments(AP) Sr.K.R.Prabhakar S.C.for S S H MUTT ?. Cases referred 2010 (5) ALD4442 2011 (4) ALD433 2011 (6) ALD5024 (2005) 12 SCC775 2012 (2) ALD3326 2012 (6) ALD2607 (1989) 3 SCC998 (2012) 1 SCC656 9 AIR1957Madras 472 10 AIR1970Orissa 22 11 AIR1958Patna 193, 12 (2009) 7 SCC36313 2013 (4) ALD42614 AIR1955SC60415 1902 AC47416 2014 (4) ALD35817 2013 1 ALT77418 (2003) 5 SCC66219 (1989)14 Appeal Cases 493 20 (1980) 2 SCC12021(1980) 4 SCC65322(1980) 4 SCC69723 AIR1941PC1624 AIR1967SC1427 HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE S...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
1. Heard Sri V.L.N.G.K.Murthy and Ms.Sindoora V.N.L., learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri K.Sairama Murthy, learned counsel for the respondent No.1. The 2nd respondent appears to have expired but his presence is not necessary to decide the Revision Petition. THE BRIEF FACTS: 2. This Revision Petition is filed under Section 115 CPC challenging the order dt.10-08-2-010 in E.P.No.21 of 2008 in O.S.No.12 of 1999 of the Senior Civil Judge, Nuzvid. 3. The petitioner herein is Judgment Debtor No.1. 4. The above suit had been filed by 1st respondent Bank against him and the 2nd respondent for recovery of a sum of Rs.95,092-78 ps being the principal and interest due on a mortgage bond dt.18-07-1986 executed by then in its favour for Rs.72,450/- payable with interest @ 16.5% per annum with half yearly rests with penal interest at 2% and costs. 5. Preliminary decree in the said suit was passed on 16-12-1994 by the Subordinate Judge, Nuzvid. 6. The preliminary decree declared that the amoun...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
1. The defendants in Original Suit No.108 of 1988 on the file of the Court of Additional Subordinate Judge, Ongole (for short, the 'trial Court') preferred this Appeal challenging the decree and judgment dated 06.03.1996, wherein the suit filed by the plaintiff, for partition of the schedule property into 2 equal shares and allot one such share to the plaintiff, for rendition of true and correct accounts and grant mesne profits, was decreed. 2. For convenience of reference, the ranks given to the parties in O.S. No.108 of 1988, before the trial Court, will be adopted throughout this judgment. 3. During pendency of the Appeal, 2nd defendant-1st appellant and 1st defendant-2nd appellant herein died and, accordingly, A.S.M.P. No.8733 of 1999 filed to bring on record appellants 2, who is already on record, and appellants 3 and 4 as legal heirs of 1st appellant and respondents 4 to 6 as legal heirs of 2nd appellant is ordered on 02.07.2012; plaintiff-sole respondent herein died and, accordi...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Common Order: Ramesh Ranganathan, J. 1. M/s. Larsen and Toubro Ltd, Hyderabad filed W.P. Nos.23034 and 22960 of 2007, W.P. No.8122 and 9016 of 2008, W.P. Nos.8006 and 15121 of 2009, W.P. No.8955 of 2010, W.P. Nos.10711 and 23689 of 2011, W.P. No.6834 of 2012, W.P. No.39431 of 2013 and W.P. No.14457 of 2014. Alstom Projects India Ltd filed W.P. Nos.4763 and 12745 of 2009, and W.P. No.26994 of 2011. M/s. Siemens Ltd, Hyderabad filed W.P. Nos.16857, 16909 and 16945 of 2009, W.P. No. 25776 of 2010, W.P. No.8664 of 2013 and W.P. No.14192 of 2014. BGR Energy Systems Ltd, Nellore filed W.P. No.19516 of 2009. All the petitioners have executed turnkey projects for different customers. They claimed that the goods supplied by them, for being used in the turnkey projects, were subsequent sales exempt from tax under Section 6(2) of the CST Act, import sales under Section 5(2) of the CST Act, and the respondents lacked jurisdiction to subject these transactions to tax under the AP VAT Act treating t...
Tag this Judgment!