Comptroller And Auditor General S Duties Powers And Conditions Of Service Act 1971 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: comptroller and auditor general s duties powers and conditions of service act 1971 Sorted by: old Court: chennai Year: 1974 Page 1 of about 241 results (1.162 seconds)Velayudha Konar Vs. Kora Miah Sahib and ors.
Court : Chennai
Decided on : Jan-04-1974
Reported in : AIR1974Mad355
the transaction is valid as between the parties to the action made in the above cases cannot be torn out of in a recent case reported in nataraja v chandmul amarchand 1971 1 mad lj 474 a bench of this court to
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMuthuraman Elementary School Committee and anr. Vs. Noble Raj J. and a ...
Court : Chennai
Decided on : Jan-04-1974
Reported in : AIR1975Mad19
calcutta high court while paying lipservice this definition actually and generally disregarded it in practice as being not comprehensive enough and consisting of the entities rights stricto sensu liberties powers immunities duties no rights subjections and disabilities the four pairs of correlatives original side of the high court of calcutta exercising his powers under clause 13 letters patent transferred a suit filed in suit as a pauper on proof of compliance with the conditions of or xxxiii it is equally the right of the the merits of the suit which has been pressed into service by sri mohan kumaramangalam in support of the appealability of an order excusing delay under s 5 of the limitation act and permitting the filing of an appeal was held not
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSurendra Overseas Ltd. Vs. Union of India
Court : Chennai
Decided on : Jan-08-1974
Reported in : AIR1974Mad297
cargo in full or in part or in a damaged condition from the vessel then eo instanti clause 4 of ex without notice to the plaintiff this is a self serving activity the result of which cannot prejudice the party who has
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSri Chamundi theatre Mysore Talkies Ltd. Vs. S. Chandrasekara Rao
Court : Chennai
Decided on : Jan-08-1974
Reported in : [1975]45CompCas60(Mad)
such managing agent and pursuant to the resolution of the general body on january 10 1959 in exhibit a 1 is directions of court in the matter of exercise of his powers attached to his office and he cannot assume the role cases arising in insolvency and those arising under the companies act for winding up of companies 468 which in turn relied
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTV.K. Somasundaram Chetty Vs. Ganga Bai Ammal and ors.
Court : Chennai
Decided on : Jan-08-1974
Reported in : (1975)1MLJ152
from the above considerations even considered as a question of general principle of res judicata i am clearly of the opinion comparison of the relevant provisions contained in the tamil nadu act ii of 1927 with these contained in the 1951 act
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAssociated Traders and Engineers (P) Ltd. Vs. V.C.S. Industries (P) Lt ...
Court : Chennai
Decided on : Jan-09-1974
Reported in : AIR1975Mad29
in the courts in delhi city and that the said condition had also been incorporated as clause 17 in the g on the ground that no part of the cause of action had arisen within the limits of the courts situate in the revision petitions fait and they are dismissed no costs 1971 3scr314 no doubt the contention of the learned counsel in
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAssociated Traders and Engineers (Private) Limited Vs. V.C.S. Industri ...
Court : Chennai
Decided on : Jan-09-1974
Reported in : (1974)2MLJ198
in the courts in delhi city and that the said condition had also been incorporated as clause 17 in the g this kind it is well known that where in an action judgment has been rendered on merits the judgment ought not fail and they are dismissed no costs gammon india limited 1971 3scr314 no doubt the contention of the learned counsel in
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Settlement Officer and ors. Vs. K.V. Krishna Iyer and anr.
Court : Chennai
Decided on : Jan-10-1974
Reported in : (1974)2MLJ328
principle that a special provision excludes the applicability of the general provision with regard to the orders made under section 11 dated 9th january 1963 the government in exercise of the powers conferred by clause 6 of sub section 2 of section 1 any person who objects to any of the orders acts or proceedings of a settlement officer other than those in
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe State of Madras Vs. K.G. Ramani Iyer and ors.
Court : Chennai
Decided on : Jan-10-1974
Reported in : AIR1975Mad26
not entitled to claim exemption from the provisions of the act under the cover of section 73 vii 5 the tribunal been followed by sadasivam j in govindasami padayachi v suryanarayanaswami 1971 84 mlw 369 which was also a ease under act
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe State of Madras, Represented by the Collector of Thanjavur Vs. K.G ...
Court : Chennai
Decided on : Jan-10-1974
Reported in : (1974)2MLJ220
the madras public trusts regulation of administration of agricultural lands act lvii of 1961 but that does not make any difference not arose for consideration in akshvanathaswami devasthanam v ramaswami reddiar 1971 84 l w 335 ismail j after an elaborate consideration
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT