Skip to content


Compounding - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: compounding Court: customs excise and service tax appellate tribunal cestat tamil nadu Year: 2001 Page 1 of about 9 results (0.042 seconds)
May 22 2001 (TRI)

M/S. Indo NissIn Foods Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs, Chennai

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on : May-22-2001

Reported in : (2001)(133)ELT413Tri(Chennai)

..... composition 50 50 mixture of nycleotide 5 inosinate imp amp 5 guanylate gmp the two compounds with strong flavour enhancing properties therefore he held that they were rightly classifiable under 3824 ..... that under tariff heading 29 42 the item has to be separate chemically defined organic compound not classified elsewhere the item imported was flavour enhances potentiators and are food additive that .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 11 2001 (TRI)

Abhishek Steels Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on : Jan-11-2001

Reported in : (2001)(74)ECC594

..... of hot re rolling steel mills annual capacity determination rules 1997 compounded levy scheme he stated that non tariff notification no 31 97 ..... is applicable only in respect of the goods cleared under the compounded levy scheme our this view is further supported by the fact ..... date and cleared thereof in respect of units covered by the compounded levy scheme only 10 in view of the above facts and .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 29 2001 (TRI)

M/S. Sunco Rubber Ltd. and 4 Others Vs. Cce, Trichy

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on : May-29-2001

..... of tread rubber by manipulating clearance of 29191 52 kgs of compounded rubber of jayton ii that jayton colluded with sunco stating ..... they received 29191 52 kgs of compounded rubber and manufactured 29036 kgs of tread rubber c agreed ..... as the department cannot disbelieve removal of 66715 kgs of the compounded rubber under rule 57f 3 challans which were enclosed to .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 07 2001 (TRI)

S.R.F. Limited Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on : Dec-07-2001

..... the assistant commissioner of central excise chennai i commissionerate the appellants are manufacturers of nylon compounded chips nylon yarn and nylon tyre cord fabric falling under chapter heading numbers 39 08 ..... synthetics ltd and they had utilised the duty paid inputs in the manufacture of nylon compounded chips 2 the revenue had taken a view that the duty paid by their supplier .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 11 2001 (TRI)

Cce, Madras Vs. M/S. Bimetal Bearings Ltd.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on : May-11-2001

Reported in : (2001)(138)ELT268Tri(Chennai)

..... production in powder form in such thermosetting resins as acrylics epoxies and polyesters appropriately compounded these are applied to auto bodies machinery and other industrial products by electrostatic ..... cord are coated by extrusion such thoromosstting resins as acrylics spoixes and polyesters appropriately compounded are available in powder from and other applied to mute bodies machinery any .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 12 2001 (TRI)

S.R.F. Limited Vs. Cce, Chennai

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on : Apr-12-2001

..... of rs 8 92 766 and penalty of rs 2000 appellants are manufacturers of nylon compounded chips nylon yarn etc they had received inputs under rule 57f 4 of ce rules .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 17 2001 (TRI)

Commissioner of Central Excise, Vs. M/S. Lakshmi Machine Works Ltd.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on : Jul-17-2001

Reported in : (2001)(77)ECC519

..... of duty since the item removed earlier under rule 57f 3 had now become a compound of the product this would also include any differential duty paid by the job worker .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 08 2001 (TRI)

M/S Sree Kandhasamy Processing Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on : Aug-08-2001

..... wherein it has been held that before passing an order under section 3a pertaining to compounded levy and abatement of duty appellants are required to be heard and on that plea .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 10 2001 (TRI)

Spasa Spares and Services Vs. the Commissioner of Central

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on : Sep-10-2001

..... that the activity of stripping up the old coating and re coating the selenium alloy compound does not amount to manufacture and that the identity of the drum remains intact we .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //